A Cyber Golf of Tonkin

Windigo · Mar 31, 2017

The “cyber-security” firm that everyone is depending on to make the case for Russia’s alleged “hacking” of the 2016 presidential election, CrowdStrike, has just retracted a key component of its analysis – but the “mainstream” media continues to chug along, ignoring any facts that contradict their preferred narrative.

As Voice of America – hardly an instrument of Russian propaganda! – reports:

“U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has revised and retracted statements it used to buttress claims of Russian hacking during last year’s American presidential election campaign. The shift followed a VOA report that the company misrepresented data published by an influential British think tank.”

This retraction pulls the rug out from under CrowdStrike’s identification of the hacking group that supposedly broke into the Democratic National Committee’s server. Last year, the company announced that “Fancy Bear” – the name they gave to the hackers – had used identical tools and methods to hack into software used by the Ukrainian military, an act they claimed led to the destruction of 80% of the Ukrainians’ howitzers in their war with rebel forces. Up until that point, CrowdStrike had merely “suspected” that the Russians were behind the DNC hack. However, given the Ukrainian “evidence,” combined with the assumption that the rebels are “Russian-backed,” CrowdStrike head honcho Dmitri Alpervovitch told the Washington Post: “Now we have high confidence it was a unit of the GRU,” i.e. Russian military intelligence.

Their retraction means that “high confidence” has been considerably lowered down to the level of a mere “suspicion.” Forced to backtrack in light of VOA’s definitive takedown, CrowdStrike’s whole case collapses. Despite dubbing the alleged hackers with the nom de guerre of “Fancy Bear” – as in the Russian bear – the evidence that supposedly identifies whoever broke into the DNC servers as GRU agents is virtually nonexistent. And the remaining “evidence” is hardly impressive. As cyber-security expert James Bamford pointed out:

“Last summer, cyber investigators plowing through the thousands of leaked emails from the Democratic National Committee uncovered a clue.

“A user named ‘Феликс Эдмундович’ modified one of the documents using settings in the Russian language. Translated, his name was Felix Edmundovich, a pseudonym referring to Felix Edmundovich Dzerzhinsky, the chief of the Soviet Union’s first secret-police organization, the Cheka.”

So why would the nefarious albeit highly skilled Russians leave this glaring clue – in Cyrillic, no less! — for all to see? Or was this “clue” deliberate misdirection on the part of the real hackers? The latter seems highly likely – not that the geniuses over at CrowdStrike would want to understand this. After all, they were paid by the Democratic National Committee, which used the incident to drum up a narrative that the evil Russians were trying to damage Hillary Clinton and elect Donald Trump. Follow the money, folks – and Alperovitch’s position with the Atlantic Council, an organization that is assiduously trying to launch another cold war with Moscow.

Remember, the FBI never looked at the DNC servers: they depended on CrowdStrike — which has a $150,000 a year no bid contract to perform “security” services for the agency — to analyze the forensic evidence. Shawn Henry, CrowdStrike’s CSO and head of CrowdStrike Services, is a former assistant executive director of the FBI.

Another leg of the Russian conspiracy theory is the “dirty dossier” compiled by “former” MI6 agent Christopher Steele, which alleges that the Kremlin has compromising information on Trump and is blackmailing him to sell his own country down the river. So who was Steele’s main source? He is one Serge Millian, who goes by at least two other names, and who even friends describe as

“[A] big-talking schmoozer than a globe-trotting interlocutor. They say he’s a self-promoter with a knack for getting himself on television … ‘He’s an opportunist. If he sees an opportunity, he would go after it,’ said Tatiana Osipova, who was a neighbor of Millian’s when he lived in Atlanta and who in 2006 helped him found a trade group, the Russian American Chamber of Commerce in the USA.”

And don’t forget: Steele paid his informants, hardly a way to incentive getting truthful intelligence. Millian denies being Steele’s source, and says the allegations in the dossier are without any basis in fact.

So if CrowdStrike’s analysis of the alleged hacking of the DNC is collapsing, why aren’t we reading about it in the “mainstream media”?

Because the media is no longer serving the interests of its readers: it has become the opposition party, intent on discrediting and overthrowing Trump’s presidency. It is, as Trump puts it, “fake news.”

And so we are forced to witness the fraud of the House Intelligence Committee conducting hearings, which are predicated on an assumption that has no basis in reality, and has already been debunked. Indeed, Democratic party politicians – and the anti-Trump wing of the GOP, represented by Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham – have invested all their political capital in an obsessive anti-Russian campaign, the goal of which is to make any rapprochement between the United States and Russia impossible.

A fraud is being perpetrated in order to achieve certain geopolitical ends. There is historical precedent for this.

In the summer of 1964, the US media reported that North Vietnamese forces had attacked an American destroyer, the USS Maddox, in international waters off the coast of North Vietnam. On the front page of the Washington Post a headline screamed: “American Planes Hit North Vietnam After Second Attack on Our Destroyers; Move Taken to Halt New Aggression” – except it wasn’t true. There had been no attack: bad weather and inexperienced sonar technicians had mistaken phantom “targets” for North Vietnamese attackers. The Maddox had suffered no damage. The “attack” never occurred.

That didn’t stop Lyndon Baines Johnson from going on national television and citing the “attack” as a pretext for escalating the war, and then going to Congress asking for passage of a resolution authorizing “all necessary action to protect our Armed Forces and to assist nations covered by the SEATO Treaty.” What became known as the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution passed the Senate with only two dissenting votes: the vote was unanimous in the House.

Thus a nation was led down the path of escalating a disastrous war on the strength of a lie.

The Russian “hacking” narrative – which all too many Democrats (and a few Republicans) are calling an “act of war” – is just such a lie. It is a cyber-Gulf of Tonkin “incident,” i.e. a made up story that is being used as a pretext for two purposes: 1) To accuse the Trump administration of “collusion” with the Russians, and 2) to block any effort to short-circuit the developing cold war with Russia and repair relations with Moscow.

The media, which has lost all sense of proportion in their eagerness to topple Trump, is promoting a dangerous lie that could lead directly to a conflict with Russia. Do we have to wait for the truth to be declassified twenty years later, as in the case of the Gulf of Tonkin? Well, no, we don’t – because the phony “Russian hacking” narrative has already been debunked by no less than a source than the Voice of America.

So the truth is already out there. The question is, when will it be acknowledged? It may take a while for the facts to percolate out there – Glenn Garvin, writing in the Miami Herald, is one of the few who have reported the VOA scoop — but the truth will come out. It always does. My fear is that it won’t come out before irreparable damage is done – not only to our relations with Russia, but to the political discourse in this country, which is already being poisoned almost beyond repair.
Click to expand...

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2017/03/30/a-cyber-gulf-of-tonkin/

This article does a pretty good job of laying out exactly how the case that Russia hacked the DNC was established. We have a single private company hired by the DNC, CrowdStrike, establishing the connection between the DNC "hack" and the Russian government.. The CTO and founder of this company is a vehemently anti-Russian Ukrainian and sits on the same think tank as Dr. Farkas of MSNBC fame. This think tank, The Atlantic Council, is also one of the leading anti-Russian think tanks in the US. Are we to trust CyberStrikes analysis when it comes to Russia? I wouldn't.

CrowdStrike has had to walk back their claims of Russia hacking Ukrainian Artillery already. This claim serves as the basis of their "high confidence" that Russia hacked the DNC. Well without the Ukranian Artillery claim anymore how can they justify their claim of "high confidence". The answer is that they cant. This claim was their evidence for linking the DNC hack to Russian Military.

While most were focused on Comey and Rodgers when the Monday closed door meeting was canceled there was also something else that the committee wanted. They wanted to talk to the CrowdStrike executives directly. For moths Comey has been telling the committee how great CrowdStrike is and that their analysis can be trusted. It seems the committee is now no longer so sure that CrowdStrike is a fair reliable player in this with their Ukrainian Artillery attribution falling apart. Mind you the Ukrainian Attribution claim was falling apart as Comey was telling congress how great CrowdStrike is.

I'm sure the leftists on the forum will attack the source despite it being a left-wing anti-war site.

Ebonyknight · Mar 31, 2017

A Cyber Golf of Tonkin

Love the pun! Intentional or not.

Windigo · Mar 31, 2017

Ebonyknight said: ↑

A Cyber Golf of Tonkin

Love the pun! Intentional or not.
Click to expand...

Nope just autocorrect

PrincipleInvestment · Apr 1, 2017

Think your title is the reason more members aren't discussing this. Maybe re-name and re-post?

PinkFloyd · Apr 1, 2017

Assange still maintains that he did not get the DNC emails from a State or the Russians. It's only our FBI, James Comey, that is making such accusations. The hack may have well come from inside the DNC itself.

Sharpie · Apr 1, 2017

Windigo said: ↑

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2017/03/30/a-cyber-gulf-of-tonkin/

This article does a pretty good job of laying out exactly how the case that Russia hacked the DNC was established. We have a single private company hired by the DNC, CrowdStrike, establishing the connection between the DNC "hack" and the Russian government.. The CTO and founder of this company is a vehemently anti-Russian Ukrainian and sits on the same think tank as Dr. Farkas of MSNBC fame. This think tank, The Atlantic Council, is also one of the leading anti-Russian think tanks in the US. Are we to trust CyberStrikes analysis when it comes to Russia? I wouldn't.

CrowdStrike has had to walk back their claims of Russia hacking Ukrainian Artillery already. This claim serves as the basis of their "high confidence" that Russia hacked the DNC. Well without the Ukranian Artillery claim anymore how can they justify their claim of "high confidence". The answer is that they cant. This claim was their evidence for linking the DNC hack to Russian Military.

While most were focused on Comey and Rodgers when the Monday closed door meeting was canceled there was also something else that the committee wanted. They wanted to talk to the CrowdStrike executives directly. For moths Comey has been telling the committee how great CrowdStrike is and that their analysis can be trusted. It seems the committee is now no longer so sure that CrowdStrike is a fair reliable player in this with their Ukrainian Artillery attribution falling apart. Mind you the Ukrainian Attribution claim was falling apart as Comey was telling congress how great CrowdStrike is.

I'm sure the leftists on the forum will attack the source despite it being a left-wing anti-war site.
Click to expand...

Crowdstrike: http://www.joshwieder.net/2015/08/crowdstrike-founder-george-kurtz-made.html
Oh, and their CFO is a Ukrainian guy named - known for working for the DNC.

GreenBayMatters · Apr 2, 2017

Bump. Waiting for DEMS to refute this,

Aphotic · Apr 2, 2017

Im glad the dnc got outed no matter who hacked them. Corrupt ****ing criminals pushing queen criminal over the populist sanders.

Disgusting charlatans one and all.

PrincipleInvestment · Apr 2, 2017

GreenBayMatters said: ↑

Bump. Waiting for DEMS to refute this,
Click to expand...

Dems prefer that things be "open to interpretation" ... facts that contradict the fantasy are completely ignored, dismissed as irrelevant, and unworthy of debate. Don't expect more than a handful of "fake news" replies.

Windigo · Apr 2, 2017

PrincipleInvestment said: ↑

Think your title is the reason more members aren't discussing this. Maybe re-name and re-post?
Click to expand...

.

PrincipleInvestment said: ↑

Dems prefer that things be "open to interpretation" ... facts that contradict the fantasy are completely ignored, dismissed as irrelevant, and unworthy of debate. Don't expect more than a handful of "fake news" replies.
Click to expand...

The new argument is that if the FBI really needed to see the servers they would have subpoenaed them.

Grokmaster · Apr 2, 2017

PinkFloyd said: ↑

Assange still maintains that he did not get the DNC emails from a State or the Russians. It's only our FBI, James Comey, that is making such accusations. The hack may have well come from inside the DNC itself.
Click to expand...

Exactly.

Log in or Sign up

A Cyber Golf of Tonkin

Windigo Banned

Ebonyknight Active Member

Windigo Banned

PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

PinkFloyd Banned

Sharpie Well-Known Member Past Donor

GreenBayMatters Well-Known Member Past Donor

Aphotic Banned

PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

Windigo Banned

Grokmaster Well-Known Member Past Donor

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

A Cyber Golf of Tonkin

Windigo Banned

Ebonyknight Active Member

Windigo Banned

PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

PinkFloyd Banned

Sharpie Well-Known Member Past Donor

GreenBayMatters Well-Known Member Past Donor

Aphotic Banned

PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

Windigo Banned

Grokmaster Well-Known Member Past Donor

Share This Page

Useful Searches