A Plot to Overturn an American Election

Third time. I'm talking specifically about government agencies which the act covers. I don't care if you copied their guidelines.

 

What do you want links to?

 

Trump only supports the constitution when it reads in his favor.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/03/politics/trump-constitution-truth-social/index.html

His re-election would be the death knell of the constitution.

 

I don't think they are out of the game at all. James filed to have Trump's and Ivana's financial records analyzed because he opened up a shell company, naming it Trump II (because he's a genius) and she pushed back saying it wasn't fair, blah, blah. Well, if she has really washed her hands of their crime family antics, there would be no reason to balk at that.

I hope he dies or flees before 2024, but if he doesn't and gets re-elected, she and equally vile hubby will continue lying, cheating and stealing from us. just outside the public eye. What choice do any of them have? They don't have any other marketable skills.

 

And that changes what, exactly?

(Kidding! You set it up so well, I just couldn't resist! )

 

If he's reelected it will only be because of the will of the People. How is that the death knell of the Constitution? Be specific or I'll just ignore your post.

 

Could be, both parties still seem determined to put old white men up though so let's see if that changes.

 

There's some strong hate going here.

 

A defense contractor with a security clearance who handles classified documents? Did that for decades.

FYI, all government contract work has to follow the same rules as the government agencies they serve.

 

Trump only supports [ANYTHING] when it reads in his favor.

 

Here's your link:

https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/leg/fra.html

 

It's a shame that non-wealthy Rs can't see past their biases to recognize these lawmakers aren't on their side.

I will work on compiling a list of names later.



https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-TRUMP/LAWMAKERS/xegpbedzdvq/

 

I have, and I don't subscribe to your subjectivist view of reality. I doubt you actually do either.

 

Geebus.

I gave you a link, hopefully you grasp the concept now. You can stop harranguing @yardmeat now. Sorry, but he has it right.

I worked for various defense contractors for a total of about 20 years during my career. As a technical writer, it was my job to know the rules on document handling. I originated classified material, and marked documents as derivatives of other classified documents. My work usually took place in a SCIF (sensitive compartmented information facility), where emails were internal only.

Outside of a SCIF, unclassified emails were okay to send and receive, while emails marked as classified had a totally different protocol.

Linking you to all of the rules for all of the government entities I worked for would be ridiculous unless you plan on spending the next couple of weeks studying them. Please take my word for it, I am not trying to deceive you on this.

 

It would be nice if you read and understood your own source.

 

Enjoy the rest of your day.

 

That's a good point.

I'm hoping they'll release the texts soon, but it probably won't happen ... so many court cases, tons of lawyers ...

 

If anyone in that cesspool had spines, they would have listened. Now, we all have to be on our country's Life Support because of a career criminal monster.

 

And those same rules apply to every contractor.

It would be nice if you would educate yourself before engaging in a debate, but I guess I shouldn't expect too much.

(You started with snarkiness, I'm simply responding in kind.)

 

Not really.

They haven't an ounce of credible evidence about "widespread election fraud" and they are out beating the hell out of people and threatening lives. Since when did "proof" have to be a thing?

Again, doesn't matter. There is not one of them I have blocked that did anything with the actual documents other than repeat whatever bullsh!t Orange Jesus said to discount it.

The only thing that happens is more lunatics hunt down the people named to threaten them. He's not in office and he is still adding to his body count.

They don't care how much proof there is. It's not going to change a damn thing. Anybody standing with him after January 6, 2021 is not interested in our country's viability or longevity.

They'll just keep hollering "whataboutism" while he lies and grifts them more. Now, I understand why there are so many dumb@ss warning labels on everything.

And, just cause...he's a f*cking traitor.

 

Re: POC. Should that be an acronym? Sorry, that just seems insulting to me. I could be wrong. It's kind of like using PWV to refer to women (People With Vaginas).

 

Mine is that the GOP will not nominate him, and he'll run as an independent.

 

If somebody doesn't get him into rehab soon, he won't be around.

 

You stated "Trump is attacking Jack Smith's family on Truth Social!" That link. Or, a copy-and-paste from Truth Social? Not sure I want to actually go there.

 

I am not aware of it being used as an insult and use it all the time except in my professional work. I'm just exhausted and was too lazy to type it out but I will make a note not to use it in the future. Thanks for bringing it to my attention and please accept my apologies for the offense.