A Second Whistleblower Complaint Is Targeting Trump's Tax Returns

I’m actually surprised how quickly republicans have turned on WBs. Have they already forgotten the Obama years or are they just banking on never having a president they don’t like again?

 

Ask the Grim Reaper....

 

Yeah. Let's get his identity out there too, just like those two.

Thanks for agreeing that's an important part of the whistleblower process.

 

If he wants to come forward, but nobody should make them

 

Yeah I mean even Obama only raided their houses and stuff.

Killing them is a bit extreme.

 

We just want the facts. Unless we know who the leaker is, we don't know if the claim is valid.

 

Obama raided a WBs home? Lol
Source?

 

Lmao because we can’t invesigate their claims and determine it that way? Nothing in their complaint requires their name to determine.

 

The left is clearly hiding behind "whistle blowers" to attack Trump. Just another way they abuse the system daily.

 

Bullshit. Making claims with no proof is a democrat trait and won't work any more. Ask Balssy Ford.

 

Then trump will have no problem showing the WB claims are false. This isn’t a party from 1982, it’s current and can be proven or disproven

 

Actually Obama did not have a stellar record with whistleblowers.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/obama-leaves-trump-a-mixed-legacy-on-whistle-blowers

 

Not stellar, but the examples in the article (Snowden) are of someone who isn’t a legal WB. Plus:
Indeed, in the view of Tom Devine, the legal director of the Government Accountability Project, an organization based in Washington, D.C., that advocates for whistle-blowers, the past eight years have been closer to a “golden age,” an era of enlightened reform that has gone largely unnoticed and that Trump’s election may soon bring to a precipitous halt.

 

The Obama administration has done more harm than any other president.

Obama Has Sentenced Whistleblowers to 25 Times the Jail Time of All Prior U.S. Presidents COMBINED

 

Leakers, not WBs. WB isn’t illegal. Leaking is.

 

Golden age??? You mean an age that we were more racially divided than ever?

https://washingtonsblog.com/2015/01...blowers-times-longer-presidents-combined.html

 

A leaker is not a WB.

 

Ah, I see the distinction for Democratic purposes! Got it!

 

Yes the distinction is the law. Super sneaky huh lol
Go through an IG, not a reporter. That’s how it works.

 

Sure.

Inside President Obama's War On The Fast & Furious Whistleblowers

https://www.forbes.com/sites/frankm...the-fast-furious-whistleblowers/#2d9f153541af

 

Let me guess the other sites reference the reason article?

 

Of course it does.

The identity of the leaker is required to determine their level of knowledge, and to ask what legal team wrote the report for him.

 

Can’t find the part about the raid, can you quote it?

 

"This article originally appeared on Raw Story"

The only one that counts.

 

None of that matters. You can determine if what he said was true or not.
Was Aid with held?
Did trump pressure Ukraine to go after Biden?
Are they hiding calls on a top secret server?
Etc