A workplace massacre in 1776

Discussion in 'Gun Control' started by exotix, Apr 22, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Mayor Snorkum

    Mayor Snorkum Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2012
    Messages:
    3,669
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The amendment says "The People".

    So you are now arguing that the mentally ill aren't people. You liberals will do and say ANYTHING if you believe it will let you steal more freedom from someone.

    What "massacre" happened in 1776?

    The Boston Massacre happened on March 5, 1770, the Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788.

    Explain.
     
  2. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wll gee,they were smart enough torisk their lives starting a new country,writing it's laws that have lasted us over 200 years,and the weren't smart enough to envision technological advancement?

    Get real
     
  3. Unifier

    Unifier New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    14,479
    Likes Received:
    531
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What we have here is a nice trite bucket of fail that once again assumes that if we take the "big and scary looking" guns away from the responsible citizens then somehow it will solve all of our violence problems. Completely ignoring the fact that.... I can't believe I keep having to say this, but apparently some people still don't get it........ CRIMINALS DON'T FOLLOW LAWS. Let's look at this logically for a second. In this video, a man walks into his work place and shoots at a co-worker. Would you like to show me where this act is legal? Oh, what's that? It's not? Are you sure? But if it's not legal, then why is he doing it? Because surely if possessing a semiautomatic were illegal, he'd follow that law. Right? I mean, gun control laws clearly keep guns out of the hands of criminals since neither of the Tsarnaev brothers were legally qualified to purchase a gun and they obviously weren't able to get ahold of any guns which was why they shot one cop dead and ended up in two other separate shootouts with police........ hmm....... wait a minute.

    You guys have to get over this ridiculous dumbass emotional gunphobia and start looking at these situations logically. If someone wants to shoot somebody, they're probably not concerned with breaking laws. Since shooting people is kind of, you know, illegal. So who do you think you're actually punishing with gun restrictions? That's right, the people that actually follow the law.
     
  4. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The 2nd Amendment. Duh!

    Where in the 2nd Amendment does it say how many bullets, powder, and guns a citizen can have?

    You do realize that when the 2nd Amendment was penned, citizens could own the same weapons as the current standing army?
     
  5. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No.

    And they didn't qualify the vice versa either.
     
  6. Bluespade

    Bluespade Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2010
    Messages:
    15,669
    Likes Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I love when people who aren't smart enough to manipulate the 2nd amendment or the intentions of the founders of our country, try manipulating the 2nd amendment or the intentions of our country's founders. The results are alway hilarious.
     
  7. Wehrwolfen

    Wehrwolfen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2013
    Messages:
    25,350
    Likes Received:
    5,257
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Our forefathers were quite aware of technical advances then as are today. That is why we used sharpshooters using Pennsylvania or Kentucky RIFLES to bring down their leaders. Just because we now have fully automatic weapons today, haven't they be restricted to the public? I believe that was done in 1994. The advances in semi-automatic weapons have not really changed since the beginning of the 20th Century. The Ergonomics have improved making the handling of semi-automatic weapons easier. A point of fact. Why did Diane Feinstein designate the M1A Carbine, or the AK-47 semi-automatic only as assault weapons? Certainly not for their calibers, it's just the way the LOOK.
     
  8. RPA1

    RPA1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    22,806
    Likes Received:
    1,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The American Revolution.
     
  9. Mayor Snorkum

    Mayor Snorkum Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2012
    Messages:
    3,669
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    He must know what the militia is.

    You should should try to find out what it means, if you're going to post on the topic.
     
  10. submarinepainter

    submarinepainter Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    21,596
    Likes Received:
    1,528
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    thread moved
     
  11. nimdabew

    nimdabew Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2012
    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Athens, Georgia

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Athens_(1946)

     
  12. Whaler17

    Whaler17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    27,801
    Likes Received:
    302
    Trophy Points:
    83
    As many as it takes!!!!

    James Madison: “Americans have the right and advantage of being armed, unlike the people of other countries, whose leaders are afraid to trust them with arms.” (Federalist Paper #46)

    Thomas Jefferson: “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” (T. Jefferson papers, 334, C.J. Boyd, Ed. 1950)

    John Adams: “Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion in private self defense.” (A defense of the Constitution of the US)

    Benjamin Franklin: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” (Nov 11 1755, from the Pennsylvania Assembly’s reply to the Governor of Pennsylvania.)

    George Mason: “To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them.” (3 Elliot, Debates at 380)

    Patrick Henry: “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.”

    Thomas Paine: “…arms…discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. …Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived the use of them.”
















     
  13. Shangrila

    Shangrila staff Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    29,114
    Likes Received:
    674
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Flame bait thread, now closed

    Shangrila
    Site Moderator
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page