All the Conspiracy Deniers Got Owned By Dr. Cyril Wecht

Discussion in 'JFK' started by resisting arrest, Jun 9, 2016.

  1. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That link does not disprove the source of the shot from above and behind
     
  2. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No it does not contradict the autopsy at all.

    They were emergency room doctors making a casual observation they were not trained pathologists conducting an autopsy.

    A casual observation does not contradict expert examination
     
  3. Lesh

    Lesh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    33,652
    Likes Received:
    9,275
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It shows how flawed the autopsy was.

    Thanks for playing
     
  4. Lesh

    Lesh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    33,652
    Likes Received:
    9,275
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Emergency room DOCTORS...not people on the street...looking at the PRESIDENT...

    There was nothing "casual" about anything there
     
  5. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes it was casual and just a meaningless observation they conducted no examination of any sort.

    They were trained to save lives not to conduct in depth examinations for specific causes of death. There casual observation was no different or superior or better informed than any person on the street compared to an expert autopsy
     
    Last edited: May 1, 2017
  6. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No it does not actually it only points out unimportant opinion.

    the autopsy which was conducted by experts is still the overriding evidence and unchallenged
     
  7. Lesh

    Lesh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    33,652
    Likes Received:
    9,275
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Unimportant because you say so?

    Yea...that has value
     
  8. Lesh

    Lesh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    33,652
    Likes Received:
    9,275
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How in depth does a doctor need to be to notice a fist size hole in the back of a man's head.

    Get real.

    44 out of 46...many of them ER doctors
     
  9. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Seeing a fist size hole is irrelevant.

    They conducted no examination and nothing they saw challenges or contradicts the autopsy.
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2017
  10. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No unimportant because the facts prove it is unimportant.

    The facts are that those doctors at parkland had no background or training or expertise in examining wounds to determine the specific details of those wounds but the pathologists at Bethesda WERE experts in doing so.

    The pathologists at Bethesda did a detailed and close examination of the head wound the doctors at parkland DID NOT.

    No matter how much you and other conspiracy theory loons wish it to be otherwise a casual observation ANYWHERE including the ER does not challenge or contradict expert examination.
     
  11. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When government agents illegally removed Kennedy's body from Parkland Hospital and flew him to Bethesda where two stooge administrators (Humes and Barkley) did a sham autopsy, the gaping exit would in the back of Kennedy's skull was altered and patched
    over and, voila!, the exit wound that so many ER doctors had noted was nowhere to be found. http://grandsubversion.com/jfkAssassination/atpyspg3.htm
     
    Lesh likes this.
  12. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The autopsy was not a sham and no evidence exists to support this idiotic claim that they altered the wound.

    The sketched examined and photographed the exact same wound the only difference being that they examined it closely and determined the entrance and exit path.

    The Parkland doctors only casually glanced at it and made no scientific observation.
     
  13. Lesh

    Lesh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    33,652
    Likes Received:
    9,275
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ER doctors don't "casually" exam a dead President
     
  14. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They sure don't! Anyone claiming the many ER doctors that noted that gaping hole in the back of JFK's skull were somehow mistaken
    of not paying attention is full of crap! Absolutely!
     
  15. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They did not EXAMINE him.

    they did casually look at the body and president or not of course they do
     
  16. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They sure do.

    Doctors are human like anyone else and after trying but failing to save a persons life they will look at the body.

    This casual observation does not challenge an autopsy however
     
  17. Lesh

    Lesh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    33,652
    Likes Received:
    9,275
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Even a "casual" look by an ER doctor is not going to mistake a .30 cal bullet hole for a fist size blowout.

    Nice try
     
  18. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No one said they would make such a mistake or made such a mistake

    They saw nothing to dispute or challenge the autopsy.
     
  19. Lesh

    Lesh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    33,652
    Likes Received:
    9,275
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's exactly opposite of their testimony
     
  20. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No it is not at all they said nothing at ll to challenge the autopsy.

    They casually observed a large wound.

    The autopsy observed the same wound but examined it more closely.
     
  21. Lesh

    Lesh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    33,652
    Likes Received:
    9,275
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Read the above. 42 out of 46 said there was a fist sized hole in the back of JFK's head.

    Is that in line with the autopsy?
     
  22. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Two flunkies named Hume and Boswell will go down in history as the two paper pushers who, never having actually performed a gunshot wound autopsy before, somehow overlooked the massive hole in the back of the president's skull.

    In their defense however, the wound had been covered up and altered by the government agents who illegally removed the president's body from Parkland Hospital, somewhere en route between Dallas and Bethesda, Maryland.

    At any rate, this in no way erases what so many competent and experienced ER doctors saw at Parkland the minute JFK's body arrived...
    a huge exit wound in the back of the president's skull.

    By the way, this means at least one of the shots taken at the president was from in front of the motorcade and makes moot the issue of whether Lee Harvey Oswald could have fired off three shots in six seconds at the motorcade (and hit his target twice, looking through a misaligned non-functioning sight) with a clunky, cheap war surplus rifle.

    And this in no way means Oswald was the trigger man anyway. Nothing changes the fact that no one has positively identified him as the shooter at the Texas School Book Depository. We only have the ready made Soviet Union style murder trial claims of J. Edgar Hoover
    (verdict first, trial comes later) for that.
     
    Last edited: May 5, 2017
  23. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes it is
     
  24. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong the autopsy was performed by experienced experts who had done such autopsies in the past.

    There is zero evidence of a coverup and alteration and the claim is absurd.

    They saw a large wound which is not automatic proof of an exit wound.

    No shots were fired from the front of the motorcade.

    Oswald was the only shooter and acted alone
     
  25. Lesh

    Lesh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    33,652
    Likes Received:
    9,275
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In backwards land I guess
     

Share This Page