Discussion in 'JFK' started by resisting arrest, Jun 9, 2016.
That link does not disprove the source of the shot from above and behind
No it does not contradict the autopsy at all.
They were emergency room doctors making a casual observation they were not trained pathologists conducting an autopsy.
A casual observation does not contradict expert examination
It shows how flawed the autopsy was.
Thanks for playing
Emergency room DOCTORS...not people on the street...looking at the PRESIDENT...
There was nothing "casual" about anything there
Yes it was casual and just a meaningless observation they conducted no examination of any sort.
They were trained to save lives not to conduct in depth examinations for specific causes of death. There casual observation was no different or superior or better informed than any person on the street compared to an expert autopsy
No it does not actually it only points out unimportant opinion.
the autopsy which was conducted by experts is still the overriding evidence and unchallenged
Unimportant because you say so?
Yea...that has value
How in depth does a doctor need to be to notice a fist size hole in the back of a man's head.
44 out of 46...many of them ER doctors
Seeing a fist size hole is irrelevant.
They conducted no examination and nothing they saw challenges or contradicts the autopsy.
No unimportant because the facts prove it is unimportant.
The facts are that those doctors at parkland had no background or training or expertise in examining wounds to determine the specific details of those wounds but the pathologists at Bethesda WERE experts in doing so.
The pathologists at Bethesda did a detailed and close examination of the head wound the doctors at parkland DID NOT.
No matter how much you and other conspiracy theory loons wish it to be otherwise a casual observation ANYWHERE including the ER does not challenge or contradict expert examination.
When government agents illegally removed Kennedy's body from Parkland Hospital and flew him to Bethesda where two stooge administrators (Humes and Barkley) did a sham autopsy, the gaping exit would in the back of Kennedy's skull was altered and patched
over and, voila!, the exit wound that so many ER doctors had noted was nowhere to be found. http://grandsubversion.com/jfkAssassination/atpyspg3.htm
The autopsy was not a sham and no evidence exists to support this idiotic claim that they altered the wound.
The sketched examined and photographed the exact same wound the only difference being that they examined it closely and determined the entrance and exit path.
The Parkland doctors only casually glanced at it and made no scientific observation.
ER doctors don't "casually" exam a dead President
They sure don't! Anyone claiming the many ER doctors that noted that gaping hole in the back of JFK's skull were somehow mistaken
of not paying attention is full of crap! Absolutely!
They did not EXAMINE him.
they did casually look at the body and president or not of course they do
They sure do.
Doctors are human like anyone else and after trying but failing to save a persons life they will look at the body.
This casual observation does not challenge an autopsy however
Even a "casual" look by an ER doctor is not going to mistake a .30 cal bullet hole for a fist size blowout.
No one said they would make such a mistake or made such a mistake
They saw nothing to dispute or challenge the autopsy.
That's exactly opposite of their testimony
No it is not at all they said nothing at ll to challenge the autopsy.
They casually observed a large wound.
The autopsy observed the same wound but examined it more closely.
Read the above. 42 out of 46 said there was a fist sized hole in the back of JFK's head.
Is that in line with the autopsy?
Two flunkies named Hume and Boswell will go down in history as the two paper pushers who, never having actually performed a gunshot wound autopsy before, somehow overlooked the massive hole in the back of the president's skull.
In their defense however, the wound had been covered up and altered by the government agents who illegally removed the president's body from Parkland Hospital, somewhere en route between Dallas and Bethesda, Maryland.
At any rate, this in no way erases what so many competent and experienced ER doctors saw at Parkland the minute JFK's body arrived...
a huge exit wound in the back of the president's skull.
By the way, this means at least one of the shots taken at the president was from in front of the motorcade and makes moot the issue of whether Lee Harvey Oswald could have fired off three shots in six seconds at the motorcade (and hit his target twice, looking through a misaligned non-functioning sight) with a clunky, cheap war surplus rifle.
And this in no way means Oswald was the trigger man anyway. Nothing changes the fact that no one has positively identified him as the shooter at the Texas School Book Depository. We only have the ready made Soviet Union style murder trial claims of J. Edgar Hoover
(verdict first, trial comes later) for that.
Yes it is
Wrong the autopsy was performed by experienced experts who had done such autopsies in the past.
There is zero evidence of a coverup and alteration and the claim is absurd.
They saw a large wound which is not automatic proof of an exit wound.
No shots were fired from the front of the motorcade.
Oswald was the only shooter and acted alone
In backwards land I guess
Separate names with a comma.