It has been claimed that the Apollo landings were performed on Earth on a staged set. Here is just one film from the official record that makes a complete mockery of that claim:- [video=youtube;3OVh0gm5vtc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OVh0gm5vtc[/video] As a truly laughable response, it has also been claimed that this page below demonstrates that the pictures were taken with artificial light. http://www.clavius.org/bibzz1.html Notwithstanding that that completely avoids the question posed! The answer to that very point was made directly below the quoted statement. "That is not the point here. The conspiracists claim that these photographs are impossible without supplementary light (i.e., "fill" light in lighting terms) requiring multiple light sources. They say they cannot be produced with a single light source, which would have been the case had they really been on the moon -- the single light source being the sun. But this experiment proves that a single directional light source can produce the appropriate diffuse interreflections for the Apollo photography, contrary to the conspiracy theory's claims. In this particular experiment, it doesn't matter whether the light source is artificial or natural. It's only important that the light source be directional, fairly distant, and the only light source. The conspiracists' objection to this experiment isn't based on science. They haven't shown what specific aspect of the artificiality of the light source defeats the experiment. They can only make vague, handwaving arguments about the "artificial" light source and hope that generates enough uncertainty and doubt to undermine its credibility with the layman. But in fact the experiment shows how little the conspiracists actually know about lighting and photography. They perform no experiments. They simply show example photographs under what they claim are identical conditions (but ignore aspects such as photo exposure), or simply provide edited versions of the photos that show what they believe should have happened. That's not proof; it's just an elaborately stated opinion that happens to be wrong." So, the question is: How was this so called Moon set lit so that there is always one set of shadows on every object? Another example of long footage, extremely big areas, evenly lit terrain and single shadows: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0438bdGbS0 That video features a zoom in on the Earth(30:1, numerous verifiable lunar motion/hops and massively long kicked regolith(41:50).