Apparently, George Zimmerman is not quite the monster that people thought he was

Have I missed something? Watermelon juice? Who even sells something like that? And wasn't Arizona Iced Tea in the evidence report?

 

Mmm...looky! Vitamin C enriched, too. I feel black just looking at it!

​

 

I just want to know how anyone can convince themselves that the person who ran away from potential conflict, and hid once he saw his pursuer was running after him, and had the wherewithal to ask his pursuer a reasonable question can then turn from a scared or uneasy runner into a mano y mano murderous thug complete with bad 1980s B-movie dialog.

Can anyone offer an explanation for that kind of action?

Just looking at the facts and accepting the gap as being unknowable we have one kid just walking and talking on the phone...we have a man following him in the car...we have the kid running away....we have the man getting out of the car and going towards him...we have the kid hiding...we have Z losing visual....we have the NEN operator trying to find a meeting spot, we have Zimmerman refusing a reasonable meeting spot...then we have minutes of unknown time...

Eventually they meet again, and after a short scuffle the kid ends up dead.

Now are we to believe that it is MORE likely that the kid who ran away and hid decided to turn into a murderous thug when he was initially acting reasonably like an uneasy kid or is it MORE likely that the guy who had convicted this kid of some phantom crime "Yea...he's up to no good." and expressed displeasure at the idea of this "(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)" getting away accosted the kid?

 

I thought the video made him look horrible....He looked suspicious because it was raining?? lol!

 

Thanks, never heard of the stuff. Seems you have though. 12pack in the fridge maybe?

 

Apparently, George Zimmerman is not quite the monster that people thought he was

Zimmerman became Bush in the interview ... no regrets ... I'd do it again .... and it was God's will ...

 

Someone who claims God wanted them to kill someone and they don't regret it is mentally ill.

 

The explanation is that you are making assumptions just like others are doing. You obviously are biased toward Trayvon.
1) It is known that Trayvon ran. He also approached GZ's truck before he ran. That is not the action of someone who is scared.
2) It isn't known what TM was doing once he lost GZ. DeeDee claims TM kept walking but refused to run. If TM was scared he would have continued in the direction of where he was staying instead of ending up where he ran from. Whether TM "hid" as you claim is not known. You are only assuming this.

3) DeeDee claims TM asked GZ why he was following him but witness #11 heard loud voices. So TM wasn't so polite when doing so. He didn't just ask a question as you believe. There is more to it than that. And talk about bad dialog. "Why are you following me for?" "What are you doing around here?" then a struggle. Sounds unrealistic and made up.

You are confused because you obviously don't know all the facts. You don't know TM was "hiding". You don't know what a reasonable meeting place would have been either. Only the people there would know a reasonable meeting place.

You left out Trayvon approaching GZ's truck and returning to where the struggle started. Shows he wasn't scared. Then you left out GZ being pinned to the ground after receiving head injuries. A witness saw TM pinning GZ to the ground. This backs up GZ's account. At that point, even if GZ followed TM it doesn't justify what TM did. Trayvon committed aggravated battery and was killed during the crime he was committing.

From all the evidence it is clear Trayvon was the aggressor. Trayvon committed aggravated battery and was shot during this crime.

The reason you and others have questions like this is because you are omitting any evidence that shows Trayvon as anything but an innocent "kid" walking home from the store. For the most part the media has done the same thing. This isn't the case. The defense will release their discovery coming up. I hope they have investigated the background of Trayvon and DeeDee. If they have it will be released. The image of Trayvon being an innocent "kid" is a myth.

 

DA's love it when defendants talk to the media

.

 

You had to like the interview ... O'Mara needs to get paid ... insHaniity needs to get paid ... Zimmerman will get life in prison ... Beelzebub works in mysterious ways ...

 

GZ could have became Obama and just blamed everything on Bush but then only certain people are dumb enough to buy that crapola....LOL!

 

He is doing more damage then good by talking. This is why I have been saying he is a special kind of (*)(*)(*)(*) for brains.

 

Babble ....

 

LOL! That's all ya got? Hilarious! But not as hilarious as watching the reaction of the Martin Family attorney when Hannity asked how do you get a conviction from this case:




Freaking priceless! hahaha!

This is the same reaction from most people when you ask them to explain how there will be a conviction here.

 

Just wait until the insHannity Zimmerman interview is played in court for the jury ... man o man ... LOL.

 

Unless they get the jury from another planet the interview has already been played for the jury...

 

You can move the trial to the moon and moonbats are still going to view the insHannity Zimmerman interview ....

 

TM didn't actively approach GZs truck. He was walking past it and the logical route took him past the truck. Only since GZ couldn't fathom the kid had a reason to be there the walking became nefarious in his paranoid mind. Also TM must've hid or GZ wouldn't have possibly lost sight of him. Logical inference. I'll respond more in depth when I'm not on my phone.

 

LOL! If you look at the neighborhood there were other routes a "Scared kid" could have taken. Trying to brush off this fact shows you are biased.

Whatever Champ, respond when you can.

 

They have probably already seen it as well. It is out there now. When/if a jury sees it they will be watching something they have already seen.

 

The jury will hear Zimmerman in the insHannity interview state *He (Martin) was sort of skipping away* ... then the jury will hear Zimmerman in the 911 call ... *okay he's running* ... seatbelt click ... door opening ... then 10 seconds later Martin is shot to death ...

The jury will beat-up any Zimmerhead moonbat on the jury who doesn't vote to convict Zimmerhead on the first jury vote ...

 

If the jury hears that Trayvon was shot 10 seconds after GZ left his truck they will be hearing a lie. Why do you tell lies like that?

 

The same reason you and some of the others here including the OP actually believe Zimmerman is the *white right-wing messiah* ... because as Zimmerman says ... it was Gods will ...

Sad.

 

Your response simply means that you may be. You lack the creative intellect to understand how a guy fires a gun (may even have his view blocked by Trayvon's hands even - something you may have considered if you did possess the necessary creative intellect), and isn't sure that he hit the assailant - and Trayvon starts talking? I'm sorry, but even professional marksman cannot often instantly tell.

Consider something beyond your own confirmation bias.

 

LOL! More lies...that is sad.