With the upcoming release of the IPCC report we learn that they yet again fudged the figures to support their efforts of creating the AGW cult and wealth redistribution. There will be a fair few in this aussie section with egg on their faces of their support of this failed religion. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...uters-got-effects-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html (quote)It also surprisingly reveals: IPCC scientists accept their forecast computers may have exaggerated the effect of increased carbon emissions on world temperatures and not taken enough notice of natural variability. lThey recognise the global warming pause first reported by The Mail on Sunday last year is real and concede that their computer models did not predict it. But they cannot explain why world average temperatures have not shown any statistically significant increase since 1997. lThey admit large parts of the world were as warm as they are now for decades at a time between 950 and 1250 AD centuries before the Industrial Revolution, and when the population and CO2 levels were both much lower. lThe IPCC admits that while computer models forecast a decline in Antarctic sea ice, it has actually grown to a new record high. Again, the IPCC cannot say why. lA forecast in the 2007 report that hurricanes would become more intense has simply been dropped, without mention. This year has been one of the quietest hurricane seasons in history and the US is currently enjoying its longest-ever period almost eight years without a single hurricane of Category 3 or above making landfall.(/endquote) Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cts-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html#ixzz2f17xR8ql Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
FJ, come on mate, you just need to have faith. The facts don`t make any impact, not when all the really intelligent people know that the world is going to burn, unless trillions of dollars get shuffled around by financial magicians. You know, those magicians, the ones that can make things disappear?
