Believer in the official version of 9/11 looking for hard proof of a conspiracy

You cannot offer ANY evidence linking the beardy bogeyman to 911.

The 100k offer has been on the table since day 1...september 2001.. .when the beardy bogeyman was presented to Americans.

We sat back and laughed as the media went to work on the feeble minded little Americans.

 

Bin Laden never claimed responsibility.... never ever...Pretty difficult to claim responsibility when you died before 911... dont you think?

so perhaps Claudia Schiffer really did do 911?

 

Who, pray tell is "we"?

 

I already did. Why you keep denying it isn't surprising since you ran from it like a little girl. That doesn't change the fact, though.

BTW, you still haven't picked a story nor have you offered evidence.

Why is that? It takes a massive hypocrite to act like that.

 

Normal countries that are not saturated with brainwashing propaganda.

 

100k to anyone who can link the fictional bogeyman to 911.

TEN YEARS and waiting. zzzzzzzzzz

Its pretty difficult to prove that a fictional character was behind a real event.

I think my money is safe.

 

Why are you just repeating yourself instead of addressing the post? You do realize that is spamming and is a violation of the TOS, right? Nobody wants to hear a bunch of jackasses constantly repeating the same thing over and over again.

 

Yeah, like you speak for anyone other than yourself and the voices you hear. Not exactly "countries" is it.

 

Got a list of those countries?

 

Well any first world nation is considerably less saturated with brainwashing propaganda than the US.

Amazing that millions of Americans still believe in a fictional hollywood character.

 

There you go with the conflicting story again. Make up your mind. You look like an idiot when you pretend two completely different things.

 

Please explain. I do not understand where you see conflicting stories.

Where did I ever say that Bin Laden existed?

 

Well it is simple. Either the government is framing an imaginary guy named Osama bin Laden or there is no evidence against Osama bin Laden. Take your pick, but stick with it. They are mutually exclusive.

 

You are confusing me now George.

Where did i ever say that there was evidence linking the beardy bogeyman to 911?

Of course your government framed and created this imaginary character.

By the way... your PATRIOT911 name is comedy gold.

It is exactly the reaction that your controllers wanted. 911 was intended to make you PATRIOTIC. They laugh at you.

 

Oh like THAT is hard.

You didn't. That's the problem.

And there you have the conflict. Make up your mind.

Personal attack. Reported.

 

FALSE accusation of personal attack.

REPORTED.

Clearly a sign that you have lost the debate.

Feel a wee bit embarrassed that you fell for the 911 patriot card?

 

When you're reduced to attacking a person over their name, you know you've already lost. Have a good one!

BTW, have you figured out why your claims conflict yet?

 

No conflict.

100% consistent in my argument.

Osama bin laden was sold to the US public within seconds of the towers being hit.

He was a ready made bogeyman.

 

But you claim there is no evidence. Make up your mind.

 

When you are reduced to making false accusations.. you have clearly lost.

Reported again for repeating false accusation.

Enjoy your ban.

 

Then obviously you haven't the slightest clue what constitutes a personal attack.

Um.... they're not going to ban me because you keep whining to them.

 

There is zero evidence.

No conflict there.

Your dictators have sold you the culprit of 911... they have offered no evidence...simply stated it as a fact. Much like 911 itself.

 

Laughing at Americans who fall for the PATRIOT card... is not a personal attack.

It is laughter.

 

There you go making conflicting claims again. Either Osama was sold to us as the culprit of 9/11 or there is no evidence. Make up your mind. It can't be both ways.

 

And once again you completely miss the point. Still waiting for you to get something right.

Figured out the conflict yet? It is very obvious. Your claims are making a mockery of your credibility.