Billionaire George Soros marries... again>>>MOD EDIT<<<

George Soros is a very talented man, he made billions trading with the bankers, and now a composer. A liberal hero of sorts.

 

He is indeed a liberal hero.

Which leaves the question... who will lead the Dems when he's gone?

Not that he'll likely die anytime soon. He must be pretty robust to handle a wife half his age, huh? *wink wink*

 

I suppose this is the 'admits to' part?

from 60 minutes, Dec 20, 1968: http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=43876

Wingers may call that 'collaboration,' but no reasonable person would.

BTW, the mediamatters page was just quoting the Toronto Sun's statetment. They didn't originate that material.

 

KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.

Mr. SOROS: Yes. Yes.

KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.

Mr. SOROS: Yes. That's right. Yes.

KROFT: I mean, that's -- that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?

Mr. SOROS: Not -- not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don't -- you don't see the connection. But it was -- it created no -- no problem at all.

KROFT: No feeling of guilt?

Mr. SOROS: No.

Thank you.

 

A few more divorces and he'll be just like Rush Limbaugh, except for the part about subverting democracy and the serial lying. And the drug abuse. And the Dominican vacations.

 

And owning a political party.

Come to think of it, they're actually nothing alike since Rush worked for his money... which is much less than $20 billion.

Hiw come libs hate the rich, but luv Soros?

 

Voters need to see that guest list, so they know who not to vote for...

 

[video=youtube;6vwNcNOTVzY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vwNcNOTVzY[/video]

 

Because we don't hate the rich. We oppose those of the rich who are using power and privilege to grab more power and privilege, and are becoming a class akin to French aristocracy before 1787.

 

99% of liberals have never heard of George Soros!!

You are getting a distorted picture of reality with your current sources, and, no offense, it makes you sound uneducated.

Time to get new ones. There are many that are fact-based.

 

Please supply evidence that 99% of liberals do not know who Gearge Soros is. The man has donated more than half a billion dollars to liberal causes, seems to me if the man has given that much money to an agenda those reciving the money better know who he is, or they would be just plain dumber than a box of rocks. So which is it? Are you lying about your 99% claim or are liberals dumber than a box of rocks?

 

You mean low information voters dont know who Geo Soros is? What a surprise!

(Not)

 

But if they have a liberal agenda, its OK for them to buy politicians, eh?

Got it.

 

I think Pelosi was flower girl.

 

Which is it? Are you so unreasoning as to think a false dichotomy is valid argumentation, or are you cynically using a fallacious tactic in an attempt to score points?

 

Neither. The poster has made a claim that 99% of liberals do not know who Soros is. I am asking for proof. Feel better? Not my fault he's dumber than a box of rocks.

 

The only reason I know who George Soros is because of all the times I have heard right wingers (*)(*)(*)(*) and moan and cry and (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) about him.

I had never heard about the alleged Nazi collaboration until this thread.

Then I did a little quick grocery store arithmetic in my head and realized that Soros was just a kid at the time of his supposed "crimes against humanity"

That aroused my curiosity.

Then it took about 5 minutes of research on the net for me to find out that the "Nazi collaboration" was a load of right wing crap.

 

But the fact remains, you know who he is.

 

So how do you explain that he was only 13 years old at the time of this "collaboration"?

Is he lying about his age?

Or do you think a 13 year old can be a "Nazi Collaborator"?

Maybe he was a freak of nature?

Maybe at the age of 13 he was six foot four, 220 lbs. and with five o'clock shadow at nine o'clock in the morning?

 

How come libs hate Jews but love Soros??????

Ohh yeahhhh, it's because he gives them his money!!!
It always comes down to that doesn't it.

 

Yeah... that and he's an atheist. You know how libs luvvvvvv atheists.

- - - Updated - - -

Educate yourself: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=977

 

How come wingers are so full of ridiculous BS about 'libs,' such as that they hate ANYBODY. Hate is the right wing specialty, of course.

BTW, did anybody, <ahem>, give you money to post that? Like, I thought you had to pay Randites to get them to do anything.

 

Nope, Randites have fun just like everyone else. PS, there's really no monsters under your bed either silly boy.

 

Your link verifys what I already stated, ie that he was 13 years old at the time of the so called "Nazi collaboration."

So I'll ask the question again, do you think someone 13 years old can be guilty of being a "Nazi Collaborator"?

 

Do you actually know what a collaborator is and what he does? Is a thirteen year old incapable of rendering service to the Nazis occupying his native lands?
Are you aware there are many ways to collaborate with occupying troops against your own people?

Perhaps you should go study up and come back when you are better prepared.