And you won't be hearing about it on the Fake News Media. https://www.foxnews.com/us/indiana-woman-shot-killed-argument-black-lives-matter-supporters This woman's crime? She told BLM thugs that 'all lives matter'. It's about time all these thugs are rounded up and put in concentration camps. Enough is enough.
And this will not make the front page of the New York Times, nor the Washington Post. And will Don Lemon and Fredo Cuomo discuss this? Absolutely not. And you'll still have these gullible whites screaming, "Black Lives Matter!"
While I support your message, I think there is more to this story than what we know. They had an argument. Both groups were hostile to each other.
Had she shot the BLM supporter it would be deemed a hate crime, national news and the usual posters would have this thread, 3 or 4 pages long, by now!
Now c'mon man, you know good and well these BLM thugs are the problem. Her 'hostility' was saying "all lives matter". From this point forward I am taking the position that anyone in the BLM thug group doesn't matter. The world would be a better place if they didn't exist.
I know that in general, BLM are the ones causing problems. I’m not disputing that. But ignoring the fact that they had a conflict before these slogans were flying makes me believe that there is a possibility of another side of the story. Killing the woman was wrong, no matter what. I’m just not sure the justification for the murder was 3 simple words. Just trying to be subjective here. Let’s hope investigators will sort this out and if the justification was really “all lives matter” then the shooting should be treated as a hate crime.
Really? You are really trying to justify a thug murdering a woman who had her back turned, and then thug runs away after murdering her? Really?
Hmm... subjective you say? What possible justification for shooting a woman who had her back turned to him did the shooter have to kill her then? I mean, just being "subjective" and all....
That is not what I’m saying. My points are: 1. Murder was wrong. 2. These groups were in conflict before these slogans were flying out. That leads me to believe that the situation needs to be thoroughly investigated. 3. If “all lives matter” was the true reason then the shooters should be charged with a hate crime.
There was none. I’m not looking for excuses or justification, I’m just interested in the other side of the story. Probably because I still believe in humanity and hope no one would pull a gun on someone saying all lives matter, because if that’s true then we are living during very sad times. Maybe one of the shooters was drunk and this chick said something insulting about their mother - that would be a better excuse (not justification) for the shooting. That’s all I’m saying.
What "other side of the story" would that be? She was unarmed, and she had her back turned to the thug who shot her. The fact that someone could be so triggered by someone uttering that "all lives matter" boggles the mind. Are you really going to stand here and defend thug nation because you think the victim brought this all on herself? Isn't this what democrats refer to as victim shaming? And here you are, well... being "subjective" and all
I don’t think we are on the same page here. I’m not defending BLM or thug nation. I’m against it. All I’m doing is expressing my reservations for the reasons of the shooting. That’s it. I didn’t say that woman should have died. I didn’t say shooting her was justified. I didn’t even say she was in the wrong.
