Bombshell: Nunes Says There Was "Incidental Surveillance" Of Trump During Obama Administration

Under the color of law. We shall see if the warrants were legally obtained or used as authorized.

Time will tell.

Cheers

 

I know nothing, we know nothing. Because our intel community has been the least forthcoming thing ever. That combined with the DNC not giving the server has this whole thing stinking real bad. We have to come to grips with the possibility that we may NEVER in fact know everything(or anything substantial) about this case.

 

But they do not actually need "wires" to do that any more - get it?
So, like they are all like innocent and everything - kinda like Madonna in that song.

 

Right. like I said, the legal warrant could be for a mail room clerk dealing Mexican pot.

Cheers

 

And if they did 'accidentally' capture the information, LEGAL obligation(as printed by other news sources) would be to DELETE that information. Yet it wasn't deleted. That in of itself is another crime. The reality is: Several players inside Washington DC have a lot of things to answer to and probably a federal cell awaiting their future.

 

1. Trump was right about the surveillance. 2. The leakers all violated The Espionage Act.

Which begs the question: Has a grand jury been tasked to investigate all this?

 

Spies are liars. "Journalists" publish the lies - it's a partnership.

“(2) The reasons no rational person should blindly believe anonymous claims of this sort — even if it is pleasing to believe such claims — should be obvious by now.

To begin with, CIA officials are professional, systematic liars; they lie constantly, by design, and with great skill, and have for many decades, as have intelligence officials in other agencies.” THE INTERCEPT, Anonymous Leaks to the WashPost About the CIA’s Russia Beliefs Are No Substitute for Evidence,Glenn Greenwald, December 10 2016,
https://theintercept.com/2016/12/10...ussia-beliefs-are-no-substitute-for-evidence/

 

1) Expect the Democrats to delay on that for as long as humanly possible. Because once that GJ is summoned, the conspiracy gig is up and the reality of the crimes take place. 2)That very delay again worries me, I wouldn't be surprised if we read 'breaking news: X(name here), member of the intelligence community has moved himself and his family to the Dominican Republic' or something like that lol.

 

I wonder if Nunes let Comey come in and testify knowing he was going to lie so he could crucify him in a few days.

Baby face Schiff has been awfully quiet.

 

Why was Trump talking to Russian agents who were under US surveillance?

 

no, there is no evidence Trump or Trump Tower was wiretapped.

 

And all politically motivated.

I'm thinking that the numbers of co-conspirators is in the dozens. Anyone that saw the unmasked reports or un-redacted transcripts and didn't act in accordance with law to expose the crime is guilty.

Cheers

 

He's spouting off nonsense unrelated to the latest news. The Right is living in total fantasy land and they have totally abandoned reality. The OP does not mention that this was an incidental surveillance and has nothing to do with Obama. They are so desperate to change this narrative that they are at a loss to create a logical argument, so they just event nonsense as they go along by dreaming up anything in their heads. The OP's thread is prime example.

 

He wasn't, keep up.

Cheers

 

Vera Lynn the singer of that song just celebrated her 100th birthday.
Still think that is the best film ending ever.

 

Please note that this was the point made by my very good, pro leaker, source. Read it again.

But also note that so far the leakers have revealed no corruption on the part of the Trump administration while exposing serious felonies committed by the spy agencies and "journalists".

 

Prove this has something to do with Obama, when this was an incidental surveillance finding?

 

The word 'Obama' doesn't mean anything anymore. Someone in the Administration either authorized it and went beyond the scope of authorization OR indeed no one authorized it, and they did it without permission. Either way, it doesn't look good for our vaunted "intelligence" community.

 

Isn't it though?

 

Not if it was incidental. And the word Obama means everything, because Trump lied about him doing the wiretap.

 

Not to late to flee.

 

You can go on believing Trump is Hitler and that he has Holocaust plans awaiting us. I'm interested in the nefarious criminal activity of a leaker(or Leakers) inside of the Federal Government. Just as interesting BTW would be if the DNC lied about being hacked. Since the DNC didn't provide the physical evidence(the server), that's a possibility that should be examined as well.

For all of the statements made, very few(if any) were made under oath. Let's change that shall we.

 

Journalists don't get charged for publishing leaks

 

Exactly! And you can bet your right (*)(*)(*) that this is the reason Comey and Rogers have been investigating this for the last 8 months.

 

They do if they didn't go through the right channels. That's why Snowden and Assange are palling around in the embassy. Now, if their government gave us authorization to push right through, we could arrest their asses too.