BREAKING: Supreme Court Advances Lawsuit to NULLIFY 2016 Election

It would mean they would follow the chain of succession. There is no nullifying an election. There is only impeachment.

Here is our list of 17 people in line for the presidency:

1. Vice President
1. Vice President

2. Speaker of the House of Representatives

3. President Pro Tempore of the Senate

4. Secretary of State

5. Secretary of the Treasury

6. Secretary of Defense

7. Attorney General

8. Secretary of the Interior

9. Secretary of Agriculture

10. Secretary of Commerce

11. Secretary of Labor

12. Secretary of Health and Human Services

13. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development

14. Secretary of Transportation

15. Secretary of Energy

16. Secretary of Education

17. Secretary of Veterans Affairs

 

I've never seen any Nation declare war on another nation because of election meddling, but it has caused a few Civil Wars around the world.

 

Plus there would never be another AIPAC Convention.

 

The Bernie campaign team reported that the firewall was down on the DNC server repeatedly, but the DNC ignored it until they could first have their plant in the Bernie camp access Hillary's campaign information. Apparently the Hillary-plant was the only accessing it. But the bottom-line is that no one at the time this information was being released to the voting public was claiming that the election would be void until after Hillary lost. The DNC looks pathetic right now, playing out the very definition of insanity (like making comments that Oprah Winfrey might try her hand for the WH in 2020). How many times does the Democrat Party have to lose before they decide that it might be wise to do something different?

Democrats are already facing more losses in the coming 2018 mid-terms and from what I'm hearing they don't have any plans to change their strategies. Instead they are planning to accelerate doing the same thing that just sunk their battleship.

 

A curious claim. Hilary Clinton and the DNC opened up their records to the Russians, any foreign government and any hacker who wanted them, with Hilary Clinton breaking all security rules SHE SIGNED to do so. Now argues that her and the DNC doing so cost her the election, so therefore the election should be erased because she and the DNC screwed up big time.

It also is a curious claim to argue that the election should be eliminated because people learned the truth about her and the DNC - and if they had been able to prevent their lies, plots and schemes from becoming known she would have won.

 

Every country meddles in other countries governments and elections. This is a big pile of nothing.

 

It's true that the Russian have a history of meddling in the elections of other Nations. In fact Russia ranks #2, but now guess who's on First.

 

What is this insanity which has stricken the hierarchy of the American government? I'm afraid I can foresee some extremely serious societal ramifications if this is true and it goes ahead, not least because there's no way the Russian government can be proved to even be implicated, never mind proven guilty.

- - - Updated - - -

What evidence do you have of that?

 

Democrats have zero proof . They just have their panties in a wad and it makes them irritable.

 

But they're setting themselves up for such a big fall that it will undoubtedly destroy their credibility, and not only that - they'll have humiliated the entire party into being unelectable for decades to come. Surely they can see that??

 

Don't bet on it . Have you been listening to these people. Wow.

 

That is concerning, because opens avenue for specific elites to, though a rigged election, put in power individual not elected in legal manner, because of lack of public criticism towards such event. Am I correct?

 

I'm pretty sure it was included in that link I cited.

 

The more I think about it the more I'm doubting the link's authenticity - the action itself would destroy the very concept of 'democracy', and the US is the last country on the planet which would do that. Phew I was a bit worried when I first read the OP.

 

Sorry, I didn't realise there was a link; all your post looked like text until you pointed it out.

 

More fake news from the left. Shocker!

NOT!

 

The hacking was not the meddling, it was the public release of the contents of the hack that the Democrats are claiming was the meddling. But whoever leaked was not dropping fabricated propaganda (like the US does when it meddles), nor did they fabricate the contents themselves (which no one in the DNC claimed were false nor would the DNC allow the FBI to review their authenticity). And no one claimed that the Russian (or anyone) hacked actual voting machines. So that means that what they're actually claiming was that the leaks influenced voters to vote the way they did. Now if the Russians pulled off a successful psychological manipulation of the entire Rust-Belt that would be a phenomenal accomplishment for Russia considering that the Democrats are still convinced that the US is anti-Russian. But the bottom-line is proving what did or did not influence a huge swath of US voters to vote the way they did is utterly impossible. The Democrat Party is fighting another losing battle and this time they're doing it on a Republican dominated battlefield.

 

Well I must admit I've been expecting something like it. The establishment and politicos are so deluded and drunk on power they'd think they can get away with anything.

 

Man, it's almost impossible to find a thread here that isn't some fake news OP.

Hey, at least cite The Onion or one of its copycats; at least they're intentionally trying to be funny.

 

Thank you for acknowledging that. Most times I do try to support my post when I think I'm mentioning something to someone that they might now already be aware of.

 

Do you really think that voters prioritize a hack over the content that was revealed by that hack? No, no, it's just the Democrats pushing that agenda (just like they did with Snowden). There seems to be a big disconnect when it comes to what matters to the voters and what the establishment thinks matters to the voters. Perhaps that's why they're always on the wrong page. Voters don't need to get on the politician's page, it's the politicians that need to get on the voter's page.

 

What? We allow it all the time with Israel. Don't you remember that big convention that was hosted by AIPAC? And the only Jew that was running was the only candidate told by AIPAC that it wasn't necessary for him to take part. We have all these lobbies running around greasing the hands of politicians on a daily basis (many of which are directly connected to foreign governments) and that apparently is just fine (as long as it's mutual). And what about when the US goes and meddles in the election of foreign governments (Hillary and Obama have both personally done that themselves)? The whole idea of making an issue out of this is a joke, and a sad one at that.

 

Seriously, you don't know what the it is? If that's the case, then that's the problem because the "it" is the content of the leaks that the DNC has been trying hard to steer every ones attention away from.

 

Nah..............lol...........I think the proper analogy is that they are simply rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

 

That is indeed comforting. I could live with that.