BTW, you ever notice how less "outraged" male homophobes are with...

lesbians?

They'll scream and make jokes and fling insults about male-on-male felatio or anal sex all day. Talk "f*gs" and every stereotype they can think of about male homosexuals....

but they just don't seem to get as "upset" or their "morality" isn't as offended...when it comes to.....girls with other girls????

 

Because their homophobia is based on disgust and aversion to male-to-male contact rather than true morality or logical consistency. As far as their sexual interests are concerned, there is nothing "homosexual" about lesbians because they are male and what they see is female sexuality. It's perhaps even more "heterosexual" of them to want to exclude the penis from their porn. Homophobia after all can go as far as disliking the sight of another man's genitals.

 

Well licking all over is also disgusting. For me I can explain that naturally a man is not as firm with women and kids as he is with another man. A real man would never hit a woman INHO, but a real man who never was in exchanging blows with another guy? (I am not a native speaker but I hope real men got me the right way...) Hmmph. I really tried not to find myself in this kind of trouble and still I had to fight three times. And there was even a situation when a friend of mine was hitting because he was jealous and I was not hitting him, just asking to stop...
So to me there is nothing sexy in this really nice (although a lil bit old-fashioned) observation.

 

Disliking....or inordinately attracted to (for someone supposedly heterosexual) and thus a projection of guilt and shame.

But your first sentence is correct.....the "moral outrage" by the homophobic is phoney. Two men holding hands causes them to go into hysterics or vile-spitting disgust....

"hot girl-on-girl action" apparently doesn't offend their "traditional" or "Christian" "values" as much, does it?

 

More women are anti-gay rights and anti-SSM for this very reason - the "ick" factor is significantly less. With women we don't generally see the "gays bad, lesbians good" effect in reverse. Few women enjoy gay male porn and whine about how sickening it is to see two women together, I find.

Heterosexual men are odd creatures. Masculinity plays a big role in it - fear of being labelled something "weak".

 

I never understood the appeal of girl on girl.Maybe it's just me but I don't see what the big deal is.

 

Women are often more open to things that aren't mainstream.
Women have always been the demanding party when it came to changes coz of their position in society.
Women often don't have an ego that's larger than their brain.

 

If it's not about the size of the breast, of course and the cost of a present compared to her friend... and... Well R U a woman?

 

I can imagine a ruskie would perceive women to be exactly that coz in his country, they often are like your description.
I'd hate having to date women with no class.

 

Well Mrs Hilton has never applied for russian citizenship I guess and the biggest breast should live elswhere, because of the traditional menu. Most probably it should be the USA and I would say it should be a more genetically welcome afraoamerican I think. Or maybe a metis of the first breed... Let's check, maori...

TA-DAAA!!! We don't have the biggest breasts but smth we have. Oh! OMG It's amazing how big they are and how right I am. I need to take pills to lower my self-esteem immidiately!

PS. Come on maori you don't have any info on your page and your name doesn't tell me your gender. And the information about dates also doesn't tell a lot. Please tell me if you are a woman.

 

Several theories....the "no dicks around" (what DevilMay said...don't have to see another guy with a stiffy, and thus it is "pure" heterosexual with just women to look at).....or just the general idea that most men have a fantasy of having two women at the same time and he gets to imagine they are "warming up" in anticipation of him "popping in to save them from their 'lesser' form of pleasure."

Regardless I'd say 90% of homophobic guys, even those who declare their "Christian or traditional values/morals"....who would gag and avert their eyes instantly at two guys closed-mouth kissing for three seconds....

would watch Anna Paquin and Portia di Rossi "go at it" for an hour and not care "what Jesus thought".

 

Sound like an ad. Care a link? (I wouldn't report for porn advertising) It's just for scientific purpose. I will tell how many seconds I watched this video and what I actually saw there and what I felt.

As a matter of fact you forgot my "theory" which is not any bad. If maori tells she's a woman I would talk differently to her. No like to a man.

 

You and your assumptions have been enjoying each other so much so why spoil it now by asking straightforward questions?

 

Homosexuality can not defend itself on it merits, Homosexuals must use bigotry to attack Heterosexuals.

Just like all things Liberal, if you can not say something good about yourself, say something based on bigotry and hate against your fabricated enemy.

 

Did I tell you how much I love you, today? Sorry if I didn't.

 

Stupidity can.

- - - Updated - - -

Cool story bro.
And then what happened?

 

And then you said "Cool story bro".
And at last you asked "And then what happened?"

 

I'm bored with you now. Either you entertain me in a decent, smart and funky way or you leave me alone.
Deal?

 

(to a side) A woman or not? A woman or not? Rememer how wrong you were about Stagnant. And he had a woman on the avatar and all these phrases...Of let's try it.

(aloud) Of course I will entertain you, but what will I get in return?

 

well duh? man on man is just gross, but woman on woman is beautiful, a piece of heaven. Unless it's those manly lesbians, then my morals are violated again.

 

Homosexuals do NOT attack 'heterosexuals'; heterosexuals per se are no problem whatsoever. Homophobes however, are something else altogether. No need 'tolerate' them from what I've experienced; they are fit to be solidly opposed and even rejected.

Just like most things overly 'GENERALIZED'... a lot of important nuances are deliberately set aside for the sake of convenience. And your commentary above, illustrates my point so readily.

 

So there are three sexual orientations now. Heterosexual who are not able to be attacked and hurt, homosexuals who are good cowboys and ... homophobes who should never be tolerated. )) Wow! Sexual orientation is soooo sexual.

 

90% sure...if kotchner is a male....he's watched or looked at "girl on girl" stuff....and oddly wasn't that "offended".

 

"Did you see those two gay guys getting married on CNN...and they KISSED after the minister said they were married?!?!? I am sick and tired of the homosexuals foisting their agenda on to me and trying to destroy the traditional Christian values this country was built on and which I support!!!!

Now if you'll excuse me I'm going home. A buddy lent me a copy of "Girls Sleepover-6" with Candy Suxx and Vanessa Vamp."

 

Funny, you can not tell by my pic. I see a lot of attacks, pretty much all attacks against men in this forum, bigoted attacks against white males which I am one. That offends me, I have been called a racist on this forum, very nice being that my wife is Brazilian from Piau, born poor which means much. So there is much posting here based on hate and fear, all coming from one side of the aisle. Sure there are some "right-wing" users that are rotten, but on the internet in forums where the administrators have pointed out that there are multiple accounts by single users some of these users are simple political advocates posing to make "the right wingers" look bad.

Girl on Girl stuff, does it offend me, no, but it does make me sad, as does Homosexuality. I lost my brother to Homosexuality, he got AIDS due to his Gay lifestyle. Pretty sad.

Can Homosexuality defend itself on its merits, not at all. If so the Liberals, the Democrats, the Progressives, the Moderates, the RINO's would all defend Homosexuality on its merits, that is not done. It is always framed as if Homosexuals are under a constant attack from people like me, the debate is one-sided bigotry, nothing more. Even this thread is based on Bigotry. Attacking a group of men, labeling them, no explanation or articles on Homophobes.

So my statement is accurate.

Lots of hate in these forums, lots of Bigotry, some I am sure for fun by immature people of both sides, but the majority of the down right awful, bigoted, hateful posts I see coming from the Left, from the Liberals.

Liberals can not defend itself on its merits, Liberalism ignores Socialism's history of war, murder, and death. Liberals can only attain power if they successfully label those who oppose as the enemy.

Here in this thread, Liberals identify an enemy, Male men opposed to Homosexuality.

This thread attacks Men, this thread has not stood on the Merits of Homosexuality.