Bush Tax Cuts Responsible For Almost A Third Of Deficit In Last 10 Years

You are in your own fantasy land, aren't you? In the real world, the country doesn't reset to zero when a new prez takes over.

I knew the Texas educational standards were shoddy, but I didn't think it was THAT bad!

 

More ad hominem. Yawn.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

 

You're right about NAFTA. But every president since then has cheerfully piled on with their support for these job-killing and environment-ravaging trade deals.

 

Unemployment is down to its lowest level since before Obama took office. You didn't know?!

 

Congress passed spending bills for the wars. I think that's how the process goes.

And Obama funded Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

I posted the truth.

 

LOL bwk said: "Your comeback is comical, yet sad. Why do you even bother, when you have nothing to counter my claims?"

Why would bwk ask you to counter your own claims? Answer: he didn't. He was upbraiding you for not addressing Dad's well-documented claims. The laughs are pointed at you right now.

 

Yes, he could not stop it because of the constant misuse of the filibuster by the GOP.

The fight against poverty is a noble effort. Invading and occupying countries leading to the deaths of thousands, the displacement of millions and a recruitment bonanza for Islamic jihad is not. Conservative fuzzy logic, again...

 

No he does not.

 

The costs of the wars were kept off-budget so the average joe public who doesn't keep up with the news would believe Dubya's lies. I provided links. Where are yours?

Your second point is a non-sequiter. Do you need me to post the definition of that, too?

 

No doubt, but if I get to the highest levels(US Senate, than US Presidency candidate) I promise to replace "free trade" with "fair and balanced trade". I don't intend, nor do I find it appropriate in our national interests to "trade" with every country. And if that means we might lose out on produce, we'll just have to find a way to make that produce ourselves.

We've become WAY too heavily reliant on the rest of the world, instead of our own resources. The country itself is like a welfare client state off the world.

 

It is that bad. And to think, they still want Mr. "OOPS" for president.

 

Lol! That's not going to happen.

 

Then explain how he hasn't then. "No he does not" tells us nothing from your side of the argument.

 

Don't be fooled by that. It's just a deliberate attempt to hijack the entire debate so he is excused from the debate. It's his way of flying the white flag, thinking no one will notice.

This crowd is all about attack. But with what, we have yet to find out. Lol! What a joke.

 

I didn't say anything about amounts. You did. You are already trying to change the conversation, because you have no legitimate excuse you can think of that can adequately answer my question. And I already new that before you hijacked the question. Thanks for playing!

 

How do you know what the 'average Joe' knows? I knew that appropriations were voted on because every time it came up it was news.

My second point makes you squirm, therefore I hit a nerve and it is quite relevant. If GW diverted money to fund the war on terror and your boy Obama funded terrorists, people can draw the distinction whether you like it or not. And if you need the definition of 'denial', I'll put it up for you.

 

Your boy had a super-majority for 4 1/2 months. The Golfer did nothing. Sooner or later your boy needs to be held responsible for something besides his tee times.

The fight was lost decades ago. There is nothing 'noble' about throwing money at bad programs in order to buy black votes.

- - - Updated - - -

Libruls are so think skinned.

 

I don't have to.

I love Monty python style argumentation.

And you guys have made an error about me too.

But you're not mature or educated enough to see what i was initially responded to because you're seeing with tunnel vision and liberal filtration.

You liberals NEVER UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES hold your own people to the standards you demand other people adhere to, just like Sal Alinsky.

So therefore your words are completely invalid to me.

Now, whine some more or realize you're not going to get anywhere with me and shut up and go sulk.

 

Lol! Yea, that whole line of (*)(*)(*)(*) is your way of holding up the white flag for excusing yourself from the challenge of locking horns with the information dad2three provided. We get it.

 

LOLOLOL,I see reading comprehension isn't your strong suit,It's no wonder you think daddy's blizzard of fluff is 'well documented'...oh well...

- - - Updated - - -

And it only took SIX years...

 

Honestly,if all you're going to do is insult,don't bother to reply to my posts,I don't need one more jack*** liberal nipping at my heels

 

Quibbling? Here's what you said:

You asked "what labor is that? Oh, you mean the sweat..." as if sweat has anything to do with the value of labor. How much someone breaks a sweat has nothing to do with the value of labor. If you choose not to defend the implications of the statements you made, then it is a tacit withdrawal.

 

No it didn't. And no it isn't.

 

Yes it did and yes it is....This has been the longest period of 'recovery' in US history.....all laid at the feet of the magical negro.

 

No it hasn't. Really really.