CA Environmentalists to Kill Trout

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by RPA1, Aug 19, 2014.

  1. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    anti-science Ludditism.
     
  2. livefree

    livefree Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2004
    Messages:
    4,205
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    That's just your ignorant un-scientific opinion without any evidence to support your assertion but your own hot air. It isn't worth squat. Anyone with any sense trusts the biologists and wildlife scientists who actually studied this situation.




    That's just your ignorant un-scientific opinion without any evidence to support your assertion but your own hot air. It isn't worth squat. Anyone with any sense trusts the biologists and wildlife scientists who actually studied this situation.





    Argument from personal ignorance. Pathetic!






    Paranoid crackpot conspiracy theory BS with no connection to reality.
     
  3. RPA1

    RPA1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    22,806
    Likes Received:
    1,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Shame, all you have left of your argument are insults.....But then, that is typical of most of your posts. I had you on 'ignore' for a while because of that.
     
  4. livefree

    livefree Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2004
    Messages:
    4,205
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You theatrically pretend you've received a personal "insult" when, in fact, I just my debunked the clueless ignorant drivel and fossil fuel industry propaganda that you post. That is so lame. You assert fraudulent crap and then when it is debunked, you claim you were insulted. LOLOL.
     
  5. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As I said- anti-science- anti-government Ludditism.

    This entire thread was started based upon it.
     
  6. RPA1

    RPA1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    22,806
    Likes Received:
    1,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You haven't responded in any intelligent way other than to call me 'ignorant', 'crackpot' etc. You have not debunked anything because you failed to respond to my queries. I understand that you believe in the environment and conservation, I do too however, this crap is radical. You do know that slapping and 'endangered' label on a species opens a whole new level of bureaucratic land manipulations that will never see the light of day. One day you will go to your favorite fishing hole and it will be off limits. This is already happening.

    https://www.sharetrails.org/node/8475

    http://www.sjel.org/vol1/endangered-species-act-and-land-use-planning.html

    Once a species is listed as endangered, Section 9 of the ESA prohibits the taking of the species.5 The term "take" includes injuring the endangered species as well as damage to its habitat.6 State and local governments, like any other person or entity, can be held liable for take of a listed species caused by the government's direct actions. Thus, local government activities such as road construction and maintenance or the operation of wastewater treatment plants are subject to the ESA's take prohibition and liability.7

    That could be YOUR patch of dirt.
     
  7. RPA1

    RPA1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    22,806
    Likes Received:
    1,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Ahhh, I see now, you equate 'science' with 'government'....Ha Ha Ha :roflol:
     

Share This Page