Camera that has 1 trillion frames per second.

Discussion in 'Religion & Philosophy' started by rstones199, Feb 24, 2012.

  1. rstones199

    rstones199 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Messages:
    15,875
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    63
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kjj5066SjTc&feature=autoshare"]Michio Kaku: This Super Camera Captures What is Beyond Human Comprehension - YouTube[/ame]

    So we now have a camera that can take one trillion frames per second. ONE TRILLION!

    It takes a billionth of a second for light to travel. In essence we can now see light travel frame by frame.

    If god is omnipresent, why can't we see him/her/it? Why wouldn't this camera be able to capture 'god'?
     
  2. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Simple. The camera is looking at the 'natural'. God is 'supernatural'. Rocket science is grand in this day and age.
     
  3. stig42

    stig42 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    5,237
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    God has advanced stealth technology? God can’t be naturally detected by bouncing waves off of it? God is so far away even if light was coming at us from him it may never reach us?
    God likes to crash in another universe?
     
  4. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Do you have any knowledge of what 'supernatural' means?
     
  5. stig42

    stig42 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    5,237
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0





    Something naturel we don’t understand yet
     
  6. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The dictionary meaning is as follows:

    "su·per·nat·u·ral (spr-nchr-l)
    adj.
    1. Of or relating to existence outside the natural world.
    2. Attributed to a power that seems to violate or go beyond natural forces.
    3. Of or relating to a deity.
    4. Of or relating to the immediate exercise of divine power; miraculous.
    5. Of or relating to the miraculous."

    Contrary to your homemade definition: look before you leap.
     
  7. stig42

    stig42 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    5,237
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    naa god would not be outside of nature so much as it would make nature bigger to include itself
     
  8. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Please do explain. Also explain how you KNOW what 'god' would or would not be.
     
  9. stig42

    stig42 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    5,237
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0


    Present in nature if god exist it is in nature it may be nature. We may not be able to see all of nature though

    if someone made god it might be artificial but it’s not supernatural

    if god was the 1st thing its very natural we may be artificial
     
  10. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ah.. the ole definition of "is". Cool... what is God?
     
  11. stig42

    stig42 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    5,237
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    wish i new i don’t even know if its something that exists if god is something that doesn’t exist i guess its not in nature

    anything that exist is inside nature if it did not arise without an intelligence directing it something may be artificial but i don’t call the computer supernatural just because it was made
     
  12. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So you admit that you don't KNOW what God is.... yet you profess to know where to find God and further profess to KNOW what God will be and can be and cannot be. Simply amazing. Sounds to me like you are presenting nothing more than arguments from ignorance of the subject matter.
     
  13. stig42

    stig42 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    5,237
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0


    Nope i never said i knew where to find god if ther is a god to be found i don’t know where or what’s in most of existence


    if god exists it must exist no matter what god is if god doesn’t exist it doesn’t exist regardless of what god is

    but the only way to separate nature from is to have no god
     
  14. rstones199

    rstones199 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Messages:
    15,875
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    63
    If this god is omnipresent, then it shouldn't be too hard to find or see him, especially with a camera that can take one trillion frames per second!
     
  15. Felicity

    Felicity Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    3,262
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    That doesn't make sense scientifically. We need light to register an image in our brain. If the photo is supposedly faster than light, how is there any image at all?


    Ah ha...It's not exactly a super high speed camera.
    http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-12-trillion-frame-per-second-video.html

    It's stitching images together to "seemingly" show the movement of a photon.

    Nice camera trick--they've got the mirrors--where's the smoke? :nod:



    It doesn't--it just "seems" to.
     
  16. rstones199

    rstones199 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Messages:
    15,875
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Why can't it seem to take a pic of 'god'?
     
  17. Felicity

    Felicity Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    3,262
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    God doesn't stand still long enough?
     
  18. rstones199

    rstones199 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Messages:
    15,875
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Nice answer :roll:
     
  19. Felicity

    Felicity Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    3,262
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    :woot:






    ..................
     
  20. stig42

    stig42 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    5,237
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0

    even then it may not be in gods nature to easily detected by are senses or equipment i hear about this dark matter stuff that supposedly doesn’t interact much with normal matter much



    Something like that that’s everywhere evenly would be even harder to detect

    And that’s assuming god is omnipresent at best you’re going to disprove an omnipresent god not god itself
     

Share This Page