Canadian Trustee who wants no nudity at Gay Pride is targeted

Discussion in 'Gay & Lesbian Rights' started by sec, Feb 20, 2014.

  1. sec

    sec Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    31,761
    Likes Received:
    7,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    please discuss the topic, not the poster
     
  2. Fugazi

    Fugazi New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2012
    Messages:
    17,057
    Likes Received:
    96
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ok I will, though the bias is noted, and while we are at it care to respond to the following -

    This guy has every right in the world to state his opinion on the nudity at the parade, just as others have every right to answer his opinion with an opposing one.

    The only pushback I see is when the parade doesn't align with your opinion.
     
  3. Liberalis

    Liberalis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2012
    Messages:
    2,432
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    48
    No one insists on dangling anything in front of any kid's face. Grow up.
     
  4. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Anyone who claims that I support anything other than what I have stated is just a Mod edit,,flounder
     
  5. JavisBeason

    JavisBeason New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    14,996
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    while rule 10 may be gone... I'm still pretty sure name calling is still against the rules....
    '

    I point out.... again.... you seem to have no issues with death threats being included in your freedom to criticize the trustee....

    - - - Updated - - -

    then they should have no problem, and not have to resort to death threats to anyone that suggests it, keeping it in their pants. I don't recall any other daytime parade that flaunts such sexual exhibitionism in order to expose kids to sodomy and oral sex.
     
  6. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    48,288
    Likes Received:
    6,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    really? then why have a hissy fit, when someone asks parade members to wear clothes....
     
  7. JavisBeason

    JavisBeason New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    14,996
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    uh-gen-duh ala Hitler Youth style
     
  8. Liberalis

    Liberalis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2012
    Messages:
    2,432
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Then you are ignorant of what is typical in Toronto. The Martigras parade is full of public nudity. Yet I didn't see our friend Sam complain about that. No, he only tried to ban nudity at the Pride parade. Nobody is exposing kids to sodomy and oral sex by being nude. That is just a nonsensical statement. Again, grow up.

    By the way, what death threats? Care to link me to a reliable source?
     
  9. Liberalis

    Liberalis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2012
    Messages:
    2,432
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Because of the double standard. For years both Martigras and Pride parades in Toronto have had public nudity. Yet our friend Sam only advocated banning nudity at Pride. Public nudity is not nearly as frowned upon in Canada (and much of the world actually) as it is in the United States. Try to understand the cultural context this event is taking place in.
     
  10. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why is it only a 'hissy fit' when homosexuals voice their opinions?

    Someone asks that parade members wear clothes- i.e. expressed his opinion.
    Others objected to that recommendation- i.e. expressed their opinion.

    But you label the latter a hissy fit.......but not the former......

    - - - Updated - - -

    And of course that is a Goebbels style statement.
     
  11. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    'I will just point out once again what I specifically said:
    Anyone who claims that I support anything other than what I have stated is just a stupid liar.

    Who did I call a name? But feel free to report- that should be amusing.


    >>>MOD EDIT Flamebait Removed<<<


    My post #276 dated 5/7/14

    First of all I have no tolerance for 'death threats' by anyone- if death threats are being made, the persons making them should be prosecuted.

    Repeated to you yesterday in post #360

    Seriously- why do you keep lying? I get rather tired of your lies.

    My post #276 dated 5/7/14

    First of all I have no tolerance for 'death threats' by anyone- if death threats are being made, the persons making them should be prosecuted.
    People who make death threats for any reason are stupid criminals who should be prosecuted. I just haven't seen any evidence that that happened.


    >>>MOD EDIT Flamebait Removed<<<

    The second lie is in regards to the death threats- I have previously exposed that lie, but I might as well do it again:



    Luckily there is a time machine when it comes to the internet
    http://web.archive.org/web/201402141...-twitter-rant/

    Not one word about a death threat.

    Matter of fact- there was no mention of 'death threats' in this thread in February....or March.....or April.....not until May 7 when Javis made this claim:

    but when a Canadian Trustee tries to make sure that the adult themed version of the gay pride parade not occur at the time posted.... he gets death threats....

    That appears to be a lie now.

    Since it wasn't in the original article- as you claimed- and no one has ever found any mention of such threats- other than by you and Javis.



    You made up the story of the 'death threats'.

    Which is really sad.
     

Share This Page