https://theconservativetreehouse.co...aborative-use-of-media-reporting/#more-201589 Let's be perfectly clear about this: They have lied through the brevity of the investigation. In 3 years, they have lied to this federal Republic. I knew they lied instinctively on day one, when they said "we can't say that in an unclassified setting". Recall, after all the story they were trying to sell us: That Trump is a Putin/Russian puppet, he's compromised, etc. Does ANY of that sound like it should be classified? Would you want your FBI to classify that information? So the only reason for any of it to be classified, was and is to hide something. Hiding that the goose laid a fat egg, there was never any Ruskie collusion and even less of any blackmail material on the President. This isn't about this current election, this isn't about anything other than the two-tiers justice of system that we live in. If we lied, manufactured evidence, hid exculpatory evidence, etc we'd all be in Leavenworth. But tragically, they either get gigs on TV or get movies made out of their "heroic" adventure. If it weren't so recent, so blatant, such a slap in your face about their accountability it'd be funny. But it's incredibly infuriating, especially in lieu of the Stone case they yelled so much about. Lying about something that didn't/doesn't exist, as opposed to lying about what they knew didn't exist. The current DOJ acknowledges it as "inappropriate behavior", would it be so simple for us peons Mr. Barr? Something tells me, not so much. As reported by John Solomon, some people(the DOJ mainly) get to break the law with impunity.
No Presidential suite. Media went nuts with that lie. FBI's Steele spreadsheet https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-10/Steele Spreadsheet-1.pdf
It's not just about our two-tiered justice system. It's also about an arrogant and lawless federal bureaucracy in Washington DC that has become a threat to our democracy.
Nice spreadsheet. It confirms that Obama did stay in the Presidential suite. Although there is no such description on the website today. Steele’s report hasn’t been disproved. It remains unverified. And there is a ton of stuff that remains redacted even though trump says he declassified everything. I expect a lot of those redactions confirm the dossier.
'It's not false, we just don't have the evidence that it's true'. ROFL, How long are you going to hold onto that? It was a fairy tale, by circulation of conspiracy theories with journalists who then nodded their head.
Indeed. Let's be very clear about this. When trump surrounded himself with an assortment of russian agents during his campaign, the government had no option but to look into it. A whole string of people were found to be involved, including trump himself as he tried to collude with foreigners to dig up or invent dirt on his opponent. Since becoming potus, he's literally bent over backward to let putin have his way on everything that he wanted. Any rational person would be suspicious of trump's obsequious behavior and suspicious actions, such as confiscating and destroying the notes the interpreter took when he met putin. All the weasel whining from the repubs about the process that snared the trump gang doesn't obscure the truth about trump and his henchmen, and it's just more irrelevant smoke and mirrors trying to distract from the quisling in the White House and the actions of his gang. If they cared about their country, they would have demanded trump to find out the truth instead of letting him denigrate our own people to pander to putin. What sort of American puts up with that sort of treasonous bullshit?
'Pandering to Putin'. Cute, but that's not how it works. When the DOJ asserts something, it's up to the department to actually prove it. In a court of law. And if they can't do that for whatever reasons, we should get a trove of evidence in the public sphere(and no, an indictment doesn't count. All that did was basically state their case.) Yes, that's what indictments are essentially, they're like a pre-opening statement before the proceedings even begin. Since the DOJ hadn't shown it, hell the intelligence communities hadn't shown it(they have accused it though), while Putin is not an American and not entitled to our due justice system(though I even doubt that exists anymore), it's common sense that we would wait to see evidence of these charges before actually believing them. The only evidence to date, is the Wikileaks release of the emails and the DOJ claims that Wikileaks is an outlet for the Russians(we didn't hear these claims however, when Wikileaks first debuted in 2010.) Which I find interesting. Was Wikileaks a Russian operation before or after the 2016 campaign? So like Trump, I have my suspicions. it's even more suspicious that four years later, the DOJ has yet to prove the case and seems to have lost focus and interest on the case.
