Climate change science resources

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by Bowerbird, Jan 3, 2021.

  1. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,686
    Likes Received:
    74,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Hmmmmm an “epistemological” study


    epistemological
    /ɪˌpɪstɪməˈlɒdʒɪk(ə)l/
    Learn to pronounce

    adjective
    PHILOSOPHY
    relating to the theory of knowledge, especially with regard to its methods, validity, and scope, and the distinction between justified belief and opinion.
    "what epistemological foundation is there for such an artificial discrimination?"
    Oh! Dear!

    impact factor 0.263

    sp, as a comparison the Journal “Nature” has an impact factor of 42.778

    in other words this “journal” is an obscure publication no one has heard of
     
  2. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,686
    Likes Received:
    74,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Why should I waste time on on internet twaddle?
     
  3. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    1,713
    Likes Received:
    1,467
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You missed this part:

    LINK

    As usual you don't provide a counterpoint to the science presentation.
     
  4. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    1,713
    Likes Received:
    1,467
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Does this mean you don't believe CO2 absorb IR?

    :roflol:
     
  5. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,686
    Likes Received:
    74,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
  6. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,686
    Likes Received:
    74,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    What “science” it is an “epistemological” study :roll:
     
  7. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,686
    Likes Received:
    74,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Translation: can’t be bothered with real science so will get all my information from from the internet equivalent of “sum bloke at da pub”
     
  8. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,686
    Likes Received:
    74,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    And yet the impact factor of those journals is so much higher than what you are sourcing

    You DO understand what the “impact factor” is don’t you?
     
  9. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,686
    Likes Received:
    74,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    So far I think we are running at about 50:1 for blogs vs real science
     
  10. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    1,713
    Likes Received:
    1,467
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Again you offer NOTHING to say it is a bad science report, just evasive dancing with no depth at all.
     
    Jack Hays likes this.
  11. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    1,713
    Likes Received:
    1,467
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Translation: I have no counterpoint to offer against the well sourced article.
     
    Jack Hays likes this.
  12. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    1,713
    Likes Received:
    1,467
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You have offered ZERO counterpoints to ANYTHING, how blind can you be?
     
    Jack Hays likes this.
  13. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,132
    Likes Received:
    17,786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That's not much of an argument.
     
  14. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,132
    Likes Received:
    17,786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It is a light in the darkness of climate propaganda.
     
  15. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,132
    Likes Received:
    17,786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Their impact factor merely makes the errors more damaging.
     
  16. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    1,713
    Likes Received:
    1,467
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Does this mean you dispute this?

    The very first paragraph you didn't read.

    Bolding mine

    Your source bigotry is hurting you.
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2021
    Jack Hays likes this.
  17. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    1,713
    Likes Received:
    1,467
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Real greenhouse work by inhibiting convective cooling. The GHE works by inhibiting radiative cooling.
     
    Jack Hays likes this.
  18. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    1,713
    Likes Received:
    1,467
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    "...to the theory of knowledge, especially with regard to its methods, validity, and scope, and the distinction between justified belief and opinion."

    He doesn't understand that scientists do this a lot through E-mails, seminars, science letters and so on. Heck I saw this myself in the old Yahoo science group when I was a member, where a bunch of scientists were discussing science in many ways.
     
    Jack Hays likes this.
  19. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,132
    Likes Received:
    17,786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I think someone doesn't understand how deep the water is.
    “How could the history of science fail to be a source of phenomena to which theories about knowledge may legitimately be asked to apply?”
    ― Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2021
  20. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,132
    Likes Received:
    17,786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  21. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,132
    Likes Received:
    17,786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  22. Sunsettommy

    Sunsettommy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2017
    Messages:
    1,713
    Likes Received:
    1,467
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Steve showed plenty of evidence that the lies are deliberate, yet there are plenty of programmed warmist/alarmists who will fall this blatant revision of data history because they are trained to be a follower of propaganda.

    Satellite data shows a DECLINE in recent decades.
     
    Jack Hays likes this.
  23. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,132
    Likes Received:
    17,786
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The corruption of climate science is part of a broader politicization of academia.


    Death spiral of American academia

    Posted on June 9, 2021 by curryja | 52 comments
    by Patrick J Michaels

    Earlier this year, Eric Kaufmann of the University of London published a remarkably detailed and comprehensive study of bias in academia, “Academic Freedom in Crisis: Punishment, Political Discrimination, and Self-Censorship.” Kaufmann’s writing is a product of California’s Center for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology, a small think-tank set up to do research that is forbidden in today’s academy. His finding of rampant left-sided political bias in publication, employment, and promotion in the Academy — and discrimination against anyone right-of-center — qualifies as forbidden scholarship.

    Continue reading →
     

Share This Page