Consensus 9/11

Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Nov 4, 2018.

  1. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    5,047
    Likes Received:
    1,021
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOLOLOLOL

    Did I actually see Bobbi telling someone to be honest.
     
  2. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Ridiculous isn't it?
     
  3. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Alleged?

    :roflol:

    Here is the photo Jones used in his paper:
    jones_firemen.jpg

    Here is the original:
    5575.jpg

    Jones' image was cropped from the original AND the color was changed to show the bright area as more "orange". I wonder why he changed his document and removed the photo? But alas Bobby, you'll just not address this and move the goalposts again.

    But the consensus911 panel never referenced Jones' paper eh Bobby? Got caught in a lie covering your poor researched skills.

    :roflol:

    It's funny that every time I show you evidence that the claims you present are total bullcrap, you skip over each one and claim "there's so many more" to try and minimize the damage. You're garbage is coming down brick by brick.
     
  4. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    38
    This first point is just an indication of how idiotic the book and website are.
    Explain why the consensus911 presents evidence of metals not able to be melted as proof that airplane impacts, jet fuel, and office fires caused the towers to collapse when NIST doesn't attribute the melting of steel/metals as a cause of collapse?

    I got one for you. How about changing the above to this?
    The Official Account
    The Twin Towers were brought down by airplane impacts, jet fuel, and office fires.

    The Official Account
    Unicorns are not real so could not have been present at the towers.
     
  5. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    5,047
    Likes Received:
    1,021
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As I said before, just one phony picture presented as evidence, proves they are lying,
    But when an endless stream of doctored pictures is presented as hard evidence, and every one is proven phony, there is no case.

    Except the brain dead hatters of anything government, except the check of course,
     
  6. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Stephen Jones proves that Harrit found paint chips. Below is a chip spectrum comparison.
    JonesPrimerPaintHarritThermite.jpg
     
  7. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I love the fact that Bobby promotes "honesty", but as soon as he's shown that his beliefs are based on lies, he tries to change the subject.
     
  8. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    5,047
    Likes Received:
    1,021
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And you will notice, he will not admit to it, but rather just jump on another horse.
    And there is an endless supply of brainwashed horses.
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2018
  9. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Says the guy who spends 24/7 defending one of the greatest lies of this century so far, the OCT. The molten steel/iron/metal eyewitness accounts and the physical evidence are unprecedented and a strong indication of incendiaries that were likely used to destroy all 3 towers. Neither the 9/11 Commission nor NIST investigated any of this, NIST by their own admission. The 9/11 Consensus panel exposes that egregious omission which is just one potential symptom that the towers were destroyed and that thermitic materials may have been the cause of the molten steel. They use a study by a panel of experts that claim to have found such materials in the dust. Whether the study is accurate or not is debatable, not by internet jockeys who have only only one purpose but by those who actually qualify. Again, it's only 1 out 50 consensus points. The subject is still the findings of the 9/11 Consensus panel, nothing was changed. If anything, you're trying to change the discussion with idiotic nonsense:

     
  10. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    38
    More idiocy from the site above. They write out what the official Account is below:

    They then reference Russ Wittenberg's statement that these maneuvers could not have been performed by Hani as some kind of proof. The problem with Russ? He doesn't even get the parameters/particulars of the flight correct! He makes up his own flight data and timings and bases his beliefs off of those!
    Where is Russ getting 270 degrees, and a 7,000 foot descent in two minutes when the official account clearly says 330 degrees and 7,000 feet in three minutes?

    Those people sure are some "relevant experts"! I mean referencing reports that used doctored photos (which Stephen later remove) and referencing 'experts" who can't even get the details straight!
     
  11. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Oh don't worry, it's not accurate. That's why Basile has disappeared. He can't replicate Harrit's findings. He KNOWS they're paint chips just like Stephen Jones proves.
     
  12. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Correct!

    The 9/11 consensus panel's "findings" are garbage. I already pointed out a reasons why for a few of them. I love how the panel shows the official account that planes, fire, and jet fuel caused the collapse and go into evidence that that these cannot melt steel when that wasn't even in the official account they typed out.

    How stupid!
     
  13. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Exactly, idiocy from the 9/11 Commission. The Hani story is made for gullible children.

    Agreed. You certainly aren't anyone relevant though.
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2018
    Eleuthera likes this.
  14. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What's really bogus is the OCT, what's accurate is that the 9/11 Consensus panel proves the OCT is bogus in many ways. What you do is also bogus in many ways.
     
  15. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What's garbage is your posts, emojis and all and especially your agenda.
     
  16. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    5,047
    Likes Received:
    1,021
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And you sure are gullible.
    Hani is a licensed commercial pilot.

    I am a licensed private pilot, and know the education you need to get to where he was, and it is a lot of school, and a lot of flying.
    and he is documented with the FAA.
    Regardless what your fairytale people tell you, he knew how to fly.

    The aviation industry is probably the tightest regulated industry in the country, and you do not pull the wool over on the FAA.
    Anyone who fly's will jump on my side here and speak of what it takes to advance within the flight industry.

    Of course some jerk who hasn't the slightest idea what he is talking about, will argue, but can only argue with others who haven't the slightest idea.
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2018
  17. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    5,047
    Likes Received:
    1,021
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Bobbie and Scott think they just pass out commercial pilot licenses in cracker jack boxes,
    But in reality, they are hard to get.

    A whole lot more than your drivers license.




    LOLOLOL

    And BTW, anyone following this has seen all this before, and one poster posted Hani's commercial license

    So Bobbi and Scot already know about this, but are continuing to repeat the same lie about it.
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2018
  18. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    38
    How does your... *cough*... "discussion" point above address the fact that the image used in Jones' paper was doctored (as proven) and the REMOVED from his paper at a later date when he got called on it?
     
  19. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It doesn't nor does your phony case have anything to do with the objective of the 9/11 Consensus panel. You think it's all "garbage" because you found a couple of issues out of 50 you want to challenge to cover your daily OCT prayers? Good then it's "garbage" to YOU and your like minded OCT grovelers.
     
  20. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,686
    Likes Received:
    133
    Trophy Points:
    63

Share This Page