Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Nov 4, 2018.
Stephen Jones proves that Harrit found paint chips. Below is a chip spectrum comparison.
I love the fact that Bobby promotes "honesty", but as soon as he's shown that his beliefs are based on lies, he tries to change the subject.
And you will notice, he will not admit to it, but rather just jump on another horse.
And there is an endless supply of brainwashed horses.
Says the guy who spends 24/7 defending one of the greatest lies of this century so far, the OCT. The molten steel/iron/metal eyewitness accounts and the physical evidence are unprecedented and a strong indication of incendiaries that were likely used to destroy all 3 towers. Neither the 9/11 Commission nor NIST investigated any of this, NIST by their own admission. The 9/11 Consensus panel exposes that egregious omission which is just one potential symptom that the towers were destroyed and that thermitic materials may have been the cause of the molten steel. They use a study by a panel of experts that claim to have found such materials in the dust. Whether the study is accurate or not is debatable, not by internet jockeys who have only only one purpose but by those who actually qualify. Again, it's only 1 out 50 consensus points. The subject is still the findings of the 9/11 Consensus panel, nothing was changed. If anything, you're trying to change the discussion with idiotic nonsense:
More idiocy from the site above. They write out what the official Account is below:
They then reference Russ Wittenberg's statement that these maneuvers could not have been performed by Hani as some kind of proof. The problem with Russ? He doesn't even get the parameters/particulars of the flight correct! He makes up his own flight data and timings and bases his beliefs off of those!
Where is Russ getting 270 degrees, and a 7,000 foot descent in two minutes when the official account clearly says 330 degrees and 7,000 feet in three minutes?
Those people sure are some "relevant experts"! I mean referencing reports that used doctored photos (which Stephen later remove) and referencing 'experts" who can't even get the details straight!
Oh don't worry, it's not accurate. That's why Basile has disappeared. He can't replicate Harrit's findings. He KNOWS they're paint chips just like Stephen Jones proves.
The 9/11 consensus panel's "findings" are garbage. I already pointed out a reasons why for a few of them. I love how the panel shows the official account that planes, fire, and jet fuel caused the collapse and go into evidence that that these cannot melt steel when that wasn't even in the official account they typed out.
Exactly, idiocy from the 9/11 Commission. The Hani story is made for gullible children.
Agreed. You certainly aren't anyone relevant though.
What's really bogus is the OCT, what's accurate is that the 9/11 Consensus panel proves the OCT is bogus in many ways. What you do is also bogus in many ways.
What's garbage is your posts, emojis and all and especially your agenda.
And you sure are gullible.
Hani is a licensed commercial pilot.
I am a licensed private pilot, and know the education you need to get to where he was, and it is a lot of school, and a lot of flying.
and he is documented with the FAA.
Regardless what your fairytale people tell you, he knew how to fly.
The aviation industry is probably the tightest regulated industry in the country, and you do not pull the wool over on the FAA.
Anyone who fly's will jump on my side here and speak of what it takes to advance within the flight industry.
Of course some jerk who hasn't the slightest idea what he is talking about, will argue, but can only argue with others who haven't the slightest idea.
Bobbie and Scott think they just pass out commercial pilot licenses in cracker jack boxes,
But in reality, they are hard to get.
A whole lot more than your drivers license.
And BTW, anyone following this has seen all this before, and one poster posted Hani's commercial license
So Bobbi and Scot already know about this, but are continuing to repeat the same lie about it.
How does your... *cough*... "discussion" point above address the fact that the image used in Jones' paper was doctored (as proven) and the REMOVED from his paper at a later date when he got called on it?
It doesn't nor does your phony case have anything to do with the objective of the 9/11 Consensus panel. You think it's all "garbage" because you found a couple of issues out of 50 you want to challenge to cover your daily OCT prayers? Good then it's "garbage" to YOU and your like minded OCT grovelers.
Once the viewers have seen the proof that the US government is lying*, there's really nothing you pro-official version posters can do to make them think otherwise.
We have seen proof you are lying.
Has anyone else read the book yet? ... it's fascinating ...
Flight 93 is the linchpin ...
Actually, Vigilant Guardian was the linchpin.
please explain ... it was a semiannual drill that ran in conjunction with Global Guardian ... this is what you want to use as the linchpin? ... really? ...
OK ... you want to use this ... Scott wants to pin his beliefs on pods and a flash ... I wonder what Bob's linchpin is ...
In what context?
It was the linchpin on the morning of 11 September. "Is this real life or exercise" asked the NORAD guy of the FAA guy.
There were 12 military exercises held on 9/11, several were re-scheduled to 9/11. They depleted the air defense system along the northeastern corridor of the US and were designed to confuse the radar system. To believe this was all just mere coincidence, along with hundreds of other convenient coincidences that helped facilitate and make 9/11 a rousing success is the epitome of cognitive dissonance.
Separate names with a comma.