Corbyn likened Israel's West Bank actions to the WW2 occupation of Europe

Discussion in 'Western Europe' started by Peter Dow, Aug 10, 2018.

  1. Peter Dow

    Peter Dow Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    919
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    The Telegraph. By Kate McCann, senior political correspondent. 10 AUGUST 2018
    Corbyn likened Israel's West Bank actions to the Nazi occupation of Europe

    "Jeremy Corbyn has likened Israel’s actions in the West Bank to the Second World War Nazi occupation of Europe, a comparison that breaches the international definition of anti-Semitism.

    Speaking at the Palestinian Return Centre in 2013, the Labour leader, then a backbench MP, said many would recognise the state of affairs Palestinians were under in the West Bank as being similar to those “who suffered occupation during the Second World War”.

    The emergence of the video, posted on Twitter yesterday by an anonymous account called The Golem, came as Dave Prentis, the Unison general secretary, called for the party to urgently adopt the official IHRA definition."

    Jim Murphy, the former Scottish Labour leader, also took out a full page advert in the Jewish Telegraph to apologise for the behaviour of the party’s senior team. In it he wrote that Labour “appears to have turned its back on the British Jewry”, accusing Mr Corbyn of failing to stop anti-Semitic slurs."

    Well I disagree with Mr Corbyn's comparison.
    I too have video evidence to present, which shows the Israeli army women in a very positive and similar light to other well armed women across the free world.

    Women Rule!

    So Israeli army women are like those who LIBERATED Europe from the Nazis. I trust these Israeli army women and would be happy to bow down before them like a gentleman should.

    Not my video this time but appropriate in this context.

    Zionism is Synonymous with Feminism


    Lots of love.
    Peter Dow
    Science and Politics

     
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2018
  2. alexa

    alexa Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    18,965
    Likes Received:
    3,421
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female

    Basically what you have here is the reason for not taking the IHRA working definition on Antisemitism with all its clauses coupled with the intent to label a Corbyn Government with 'antisemitism' due to his belief that the Palestinians should be subject to the same rights as every other people in the world. This is the case under International Law but due to the US vetoing UN resolutions due to US Politicians need for the massive Christian Right vote and their determination that there be no two State Resolution but instead Israel (to them Jews) must have all the land which it says in the Bible so that their intent to make Bible Prophesy come true works - and it is a new version of the bible just about 100 years old deliberately created for this purpose that they are following.

    Now the IHRA is a new, arguable worse antisemitism definition that the EUWRA. The European Working Resolution on Antisemitism was created in the US under closed doors and was never worked on. Our Universities worked with it for a while but discovered it refused to allow honest intellectual work on the Israel/Palestine issue due to its calling criticism of Israel antisemitism - as is the IHRA. They then held a meeting and a vote and determined they would throw it in the bin. The EU also took this version down from its site and it basically no longer had any power in Europe. Antisemitism was still strongly opposed but honest debate even robust debate on Israel was not antisemetic.

    Israel then tried to get our courts to rule that criticism of Israel was antisemetic. A lecturer took his union to court on a very expensive paid for case, supported by John Mann, claiming that he was offended by college discussing Israel. He was a Jew and considered Israel part of him. Hence he argued to criticise Israel was antisemetic. The judge suggested he did not go to meetings where his feelings were offended but that debating Israel was not antisemetic.

    Then we have the issue with BDS. I can't remember whether it was Cameron or May who tried to make it illegal for English councils to act in this way towards settlement produce. However they brought it to court and our courts ruled that it was perfectly legal for them to act in this way. Our courts have been very good at protecting our rights on these attacks on our democratic freedoms, unlike courts in for instance the US and France.

    Then we had this old group suddenly arrive back -The Jewish Labour Movement. It was a genuine link with the Israeli Labour Movement and went back to the formation of Israel I think but had lost support decades ago. A new Director was found for this group. That new Director was a woman whose previous job had been at the Israeli Embassy where she had been working with the British Government on ways to stop 'deligitimizing' Israel

    To top all this off tapes released by Al Jazeera showed our sovereignty to be at risk due to work coming out of the Israeli Embassy in London, creating groups who were Friends of Israel, telling them what to believe, inviting them to Israel on holiday as bribes for their support and to indoctrinate them. But even worse we discovered that at least one of them was working with one of our Members of Parliament and had on giving him advice on Israel made sure that he committed the UK government to supporting the 2014 Gaza war before it had even begun. In addition they spoke about 'taking down' British Membeers of Parliament who had concern for the rights of the Palestinians - the one in particular who they spoke of possibly taking down ( everyone has something in the cupboard they said) was a Conservative Member of Parliament. May did nothing on this. Rather shortly after she said she was accepting the IHRA and it would be legal or some such thing. It was not legal. People had every right to choose not to work with it just like they had chosen not to work with the same when called European. Work then went on to force Universities to accept it.

    What is going on now and has been going on since it became obvious that it looked as if Corbyn was going to be elected leader is an ongoing attempt to 'take him down' due to his conscience over Palestinian Rights. It is an interference in our Democratic Sovereignty and something we ignore at our peril.​
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2018
  3. VotreAltesse

    VotreAltesse Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2017
    Messages:
    6,163
    Likes Received:
    3,097
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I hate the sionist and the pro palestinian for trying to make their idiot conflict a worlwide conflict. Corbyn is a politician, so it's a whore. He just sell his minds and opinions to muslims to get their votes. If there were an important jewish voters, he would have been pro israel.

    Corbyn should renounce to the british nationality and move to palestinian territories.
     
    cerberus likes this.
  4. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,530
    Likes Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Corbyn is the archetypal playing-to-the-gallery loony lefty. Show him a populist band-wagon and he'll be on it before you can say 'For the many, not the few.'
     
  5. Peter Dow

    Peter Dow Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    919
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    [​IMG]
    The campaign group, Campaign Against Antisemitism, Jewish community groups and their supporters stage a protest in Parliament Square, London, England on July 19, 2018 against the Labour Party anti-semitism code following the party's announcement that it will take action against Dame Margaret Hodge MP for calling Jeremy Corbyn an "antisemite".
     
    cerberus likes this.

Share This Page