CROWDSTRIKE the DNC hacked emails resurfaces

CROWDSTRIKE

I read the transcripts between President Trump and the President of the Ukraine.
Don't see a thing except President Trump bringing up Crowdstrike and the DNC hacked emails and a server that the FBI never was allowed by the DNC to access for some reason.

There are tens of millions of Americans who want to know why the FBI wasn't allowed access to the hacked DNC server.

Why did the Democrats spend over two years whining about Russia Russia Russdia and collusion and after the witch hunt it ends up there never was any collusion between Trump and the Russians.

So this isn't about the upcoming 2020 Presidential election but the 2016 presidential election.

Another thing surfaced today, the whistleblower.

It's no secret that under the Obama administration every executive branch of the federal government was politicized including the DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA and even the IRS.

Either the whistleblower has been...
politicized
or Is a DNC operative
or is suffering from TDS
or was passed over for a promotion and is butthurt like the Associate Director of the FBI Mark Felt (Deepthroat) was back during Watergate.

Did President Trump commit an impeachable offense wanting to know where the servers of the corrupt banana republic DNC that the FBI wasn't allowed to access back in 2016 are ?

 

No...

Not the same server. The top end players within Crowdstrke are Ukrainian and that was where this particular server as located. (All of the Cozybear innuendo and such was all total BS)

So, Crowdstrike had no choice but to do whatever the DNC told them to do with regards to the DNC server. Actually, Crowdstrike was covering for themselves as well.

The FBI investigators who were supposed to have impounded the DNC server simply followed their marching orders while telling the 16 other intelligence agencies to simply accept Crowdstrike's word on it.

So, 17 intelligence agencies blindly agreed that the Russians were to blame without a shred of actual evidence.

Hillary Clinton was not the only player with an off the grid server being used for corrupt and illegal purposes.

 

Crowdstrike is an American cybersecurity company which is currently publicly traded on the Nasdaq.

 

And Koch-Glitsch is a US company located in Witchita, Kansas.

But that didn't stop Obama from cutting an illegal deal with Putin to smuggle pipeline technology and equipment for the Crimea through the Koch-Glitsch Italia branch orchestrated by Elena Romanova.

But I regress..

Co-Founder and CTO of CrowdStrike Dmitri Alperovitch is a nonresident senior fellow on the Atlantic Council.

A Ukrainian who is has deep ties with Victor Pinchuk.

https://dailycaller.com/2017/06/24/...ryone-is-ignoring-about-the-russia-dnc-story/

 

Would that Koch-Glitsch compsany be owned by the Koch Brothers.

 

Yes it is a wholly owned business of the ultra conservative Koch Brothers!!!

 

This "Crowdstrike" thing is Trump trying to claim that the Russians didn't hack the 2016 election.

It's bogus meme that is circulating on the likes of Russia Today and Sputnik

Putin smiles

 

I plan to look into this.

 

Of course Trump can't ever do anything wrong in the eyes of Trumpers. Independents will think otherwise.

 

Are the independent's asking the Democrats the question..."Why are you trout fishing on a sand dune in the middle of the Mojave Desert ?"

That's what the Democrats have been doing since November of 2016.

DNC = Democratic National Clowns.

 

The clown is in the WH. His name is Trump.

 

I actually think this is WORSE than trying to shake down Ukraine to manufacture evidence against a political rival.

Trump is trying to force Ukraine to help the country that is ATTACKING it.

Imagine FDR saying to Churchill...yea we'll send you war material...if you'll help us prove that Poland attacked Germany and oh yea...I need you to "investigate" Wendell Wilkie

 

There is a Hillary Clinton connection to crowdstrike as well.

What a tangled web Hillary Clinton WOVE: Thread about Democrat-connected company CrowdStrike is SO incredibly damning
https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2019/...company-crowdstrike-is-so-incredibly-damning/

 

The Crowdstrike server that was brought in from the Ukraine is now sitting in a Crypto lab at Fort Gordon.

And the whistleblower is Susan M. Gordon who was under investigation for leaking well before the August letter. She evidently was trying to figure out how to cover herself by claiming immunity.



Gordon didn't even write the letter.
One of her attorneys did.
This is her photo:

 

And you know this how?

 

What a juvenile thing to be upset over.

 

How is stating fact being "upset"??

 

There is still no evidence that Russian's hacked the DNC other than from the DNC lawyers and the DNC hired Crowdstrike. Why did they never let the FBI do a forensic investigation?

 

Crowdstrike was one of the contractors that Admiral Rogers discovered was looking at huge amounts of NSA material on the FBI computer system. (Court summary of May 2017 - Re: Queries)

That is why the FISA abuses started to appear... The DNC had lost the ability to spy through a third party during October of 2016 by order of Admiral Rogers.

The DNC controlled Crowdstrike all along to do their bidding.... And so the dirty FBI players simply publicly took Crowdstrike's word for it contrary to knowing better.

Nobody ever transmitted the material over the internet because there is no record of any flow that large and the download was too fast for the local network to accommodate. Facts are tough to ignore, unless you simply have no ethical anchor.

 

The recipe for this action was included in her confirmation hearings in response to a question from Ms Collins ME (Maine). This is the direct interrogatory quote.

"Senator Collins: What more do you believe needs to be done within the IC to address the almost routine unauthorized disclosure of highly classified and sensitive information?

Ms Gordon Answer: Ishareinyourfrustrationandassessmentofthegravityofthesituation. We know that unauthorized disclosures of classified information harm our national security. I think there are several things that the JC can continue to do address this situation. First, we must aggressively address unauthorized disclosures by holding individuals accountable for their actions. Second, we should ensure we are taking steps to protect classified information and limit access to it to only those who need it to effectively accomplish the mission. Finally, it is critically important to have safe avenues for whistleblowers to raise concerns, including to this Committee, without fear of retaliation."

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/S. Hr. 115-100.pdf

As if this was scripted. Clearly, this is the method she chose to "defend" her own leaking. Looks like she has many new legal troubles.

 

Hahaha...bet you believe in the Birther Conspiracy as well.

 

You mean except for what the FBI and the Mueller team found right?

Mueller indicted 12 Russian GRU agents for that hack ya know

 

12 Russians that Mueller knew would never see a court. Also, they had nothing to do with the DNC hack. In fact, the FBI never did a forensic investigation on the DNC servers because the DNC refused to let them.

 

What is absurd is that if these emails were hacked .. they are out there in the public domain. How is it that not letting the FBI see these emails can be justified. You can't classify something top secret - that is no longer a secret.

 

Have you read their indictments and the Mueller Report?