Someone went to a lot of trouble to dig up this information. It shines a good light at his time teaching law courses at the University of Texas. Some say he's creepy but all agree he's got a very sharp legal mind. The question is; Is being a sharp constitutional lawyer enough to earn him a spot in the Oval Office? Read more with lots and lots of detailed information @ http://www.buzzfeed.com/meganapper/...ed-cruz-and-like-him-documents-sh#.asOVgy3m4m
Not when he is super creepy. I think he has too many failings and a huge lack of a plan to right what he perceives as what is wrong in the US. His arguments would have to be made more complex to be called simple. He seems to thrive on a steady diet of complete rhetoric.
