Discussion in '9/11' started by rickmullenax, Apr 14, 2014.
You have been beaten in every thread.
None of your links offer evidence
the gubbermints conspiracy theory has been quite thoroughly demolished by truthers.
i use math and knowledge of construction which all points against the nutty deniers...
Oh ya do do ya?
Cant wait to see your fea.
But i wont hold my breath not even for a nanosecond waiting!
i gave you 2 parts of the 14 steps and you gave up on it because you said it was too hard to figure it out...remember? about a year ago or so...
you are confused, I never said any such thing.
so now you stall because you have no math, much less a fea.
check your history its there..remember the weights I gave you?..nice try but not very good..
this conspiracy theory in this video by the nutty Bush dupes has indeed been thoughly demolished by the video goody posted in post# 98 and the two videos I posted as well that it was a CIA/mossad operation in post# 99.
as you can see from the replys,they have no evidence to counter those three videos of ours.
Goody for sure handed them their arses to them on a platter with his video and took them to school major big time as did i with my two videos as well.
Write a book ... win a Pulitzer ... or go back to playing to playing GTA in your Mom's basement ...
It hasn't even been dented.
It is you clowns who have been crushed
truthers debunked it years ago but posers insist on spreading disinformation and nothing any one can do about that, well except have a good laugh I suppose.
That is why their desperation has them trying to sell stupid stories of nukes and no-planes. It seems 9/11 truth is disappearing up its own insane rectum with lunatic fairy tales of profound stupidity.
Does not mean it has not 'otherwise' been debunked. Besides posers dont have the first clue about nukes and those are the only people out here to discuss anything with .
What idiot is going to bother with debunking stupid crap like nukes and no-planes? The ideas are just too stupid to bother with. It is obvious they are just idiotic stories, and some truther sites call these irrational tales 'disinfo' as they believe that people are trying to make the truth movement look stupid by circulating these ideas.
No-one needs to make the truth movement look stupid, they can do a great job of that without any help.
yeh and they told bell and edison the same thing, everything too complicated for some people to understand is 'just too stupid'.
Nah your official lie is still a lie, sorry. No one has defended it yet. sorry.
What a childish response! I'm still waiting for you to provide evidence for 'no-planes'; 'nukes'; 'Thermite cutters'; 'Digital triggering' or any other of the brain dead claims you've made.
Why do you waste people's time with empty headed posts when you could be off earning a Pulitzer with the evidence you claim to have? Get to it! You could be famous instead of being just another truther who posts rubbish on insignificant message boards.
I don't care what you believe about the accepted version, I just know Nukes and no-planes are just the refuge of the easily duped.
Twoofers never debunked anything.
But every claim they have made has in fact been debunked.
I posted a summary of inside job proof a while back but some of the links in it are dead.
I'm going to post an updated summary.
This video is a pretty good summary of all the important inside job proof. If the YouTube links don't work, do YouTube searches on the titles.
September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)
Listen to what this pilot says.
Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out!
Here's some more stuff.
Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth.org
US Criminal Regime: Expert 9/11 Witness, Danny Jowenko, Ordered Murdered
ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 911 TRUTH (full unreleased version)
Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 - AE911Truth.org
These videos do a good job of explaining the government's probable motives for planning and carrying out the 9/11 attacks.
9/11 False Flag Conspiracy - Finally Solved (Names, Connections, Motives)
So do these articles.
If people look at the above info and experience cognitive dissonance and go into denial, they should watch this video…
Why Can't They See The Truth? Psychologists Help 9 11 Truth Deniers
…and read this article.
That won't sway these posters though.
Beware of disinfo such as the no-plane theory.
provocateurs,shills and disinfo agents
(7:20 time mark)
People who say no planes hit the towers are disinfo agents trying to make the truth movement look silly. Real truthers believe that planes hit the towers.
Please don't tell me that you believe the no-plane theory.
More of the same old dumbass spam from questionable sources from Scott that no-one will bother to open.
- - - Updated - - -
Yep a card-carrying no-planer who thinks nukes are plausible.
yep the Bush dupes are the clowns that have been crushed.
they have been OWNED by you.as i got done saying,they have been CRUSHED just like they always do here everyday.lol
Yeah Koko believes it with good reason as well.I cant fault him one bit at all for believing it.I have my serious doubts about it as well. Not saying I am sold completely there were no planes that day but I am very skeptical about it though for 2 good reasons and here is WHY truthers have good reason not to believe there were planes.
1.In the guadet video-which is very suspecious,just like zapruder in the JFK assassination "who just HAPPENED to be out there that day filming the event up close" Zapruder wasnt the innocent bystander that just happened to be filming that day as the media have portrayed him to be all those years,he was a freemason.
Just as it was suspecious that Abraham zapruder just happend to be the only one that day to catch the JFK assassination up close on film that day being in the perfect position he was,its very suspecious that the gudet brothers just happened to be filming the scenes of new york that day and happened to be right there when it happened. very strange coincidence.
when you look at that film,new yorkers are just walking by casually when the planes allegedly fly in low and strike the towers.they are all acting like its a normal everday thing,no different than any other day despite the fact the plane has come in MUCH LOWER than it is suppose to when it strikes the tower.
Logically you would think everybody would be looking up saying-why is that jet coming in so low? NONE of them are doing that however.
2.More importantly though,the film shows the jet PASS THROUGH the STEEL towers like they were swiss cheese or something. How does a plane made of aluminum pass through a tower made of STEEL? Logic and common sense tells you that cant happen.
for years,I never paid attention to people like Koko and dismissed the no plane theory,however after learning these two important facts,I am very skeptical that there were planes that day
especially since it is only trolls who accept the governments version of events,who have said they live in new york and they saw planes.I have never heard any truthers that were there that day say they saw planes other than videos which could be paid actors of course like in sandy hook shooting.
there is that one video out there where you hear a lady saw after we hear the first explosion go off say-that was not a commerical airliner.
I find that just a little odd that that was her first initial reaction was to go out of her way and say something like that.seems she would be too much in shock to be talking about if it was a commerical airliner or not.
I am betting she is another paid actor like the ones in sandy hook,the fake grieving parents.
doesnt logic and common sense say that a ALUMINUM airliner is not going to pass in and out of a tower like its swiss chees like that video shows?
Lets see the overwhelming evidence that there were airliners.I have yet to see any.If you have any,I'll take a look.Right now though there has yet to be any hard core proof to prove they were there though other than easily plantable evidence and a film where the planes are coming from different angles. they always screw up in their lies and that was a BIG goof right there.
the same plane that hits the tower is coming form two different angles.
Remember steven spielberg can make a movie where it convincingly looks like dinasours are standing next to people.its called HOLLYWOOD TECHNOLOGY at its best. Seems like hollywood technology was working in overtime that day as well,that those films are as fake as the zapruder film is.
Your fantasies are delusional.
LOL Another one! Barnum's subjects are everywhere! LOLOL
Incorrect. Naudet (sp.) was filming a documentary on a fire station crew: he was attached to a crew who were performing routine duties when the attack occurred. There is nothing suspicious about it. Why do you believe he was a free mason? Oh, that's right, you never answer questions. Why is it 9/11 truth never bother to check their stupid stories? Oh, that's right, 9/11 truth don't answer questions
That was the dumbest piece I'll read today. It is odd the Zapruder was filming the President? On what planet would that be odd? Oh, that's right, you refuse to answer questions.
Yes, he captured the aftermath of the first strike. Why do you find it odd that people were walking by casually? Do you look up every time you hear a plane? Oh, that's right, you don't answer questions.
Why would they do that? Oh, that's right, you'd rather lob insults than answer questions.
No, that is an artefact from the pixilation of the extreme magnification. Undoctored footage does not show this effect. Look it up!
It doesn't seem to take much for you to believe stupid (*)(*)(*)(*) then. Ok. Neither of which are facts btw.
And you just slipped this little dirty little personal attack in just to validate your insanity. What a man you are! Typical truther mendacity.
I've never known a truther that claimed to be a witness on 9/11. Not one. Witnesses to the event usually think that truthers are bat (*)(*)(*)(*) crazy.
Another vapid argument from incredulity with no foundation.
LOLOL. Have you met a conspiracy theory you didn't think was true? Oh, that's right, answering questions is beneath you and you'd much rather spread vacuous propaganda. Btw, Sandy Hook Hoaxers are a sad joke.
Logic is not your area and common sense is anything but common. If you studied physics and momentum you would understand. But truthers are allergic to education in my experience. Even Chandler, Gage and Tzamboti are just amateurs.
There is plenty of evidence:
2). Passenger Manifests
3). Insurance payouts
5). Airline insurance claims and payouts
6). Wreckage that matches the plane data
7). DNA from the dead.
. and more, but I know you're not really interested in facts. How is it that you're oblivious to the physical evidence yet you latch on to opinion pieces and believe them instead? Strange. Oh, that's right, my bad, it was a question.
The evidence against the existence of the planes:
1). ? Three fifths of nothing at all.
Yet you are unable to prove the use of special effects (here's a tip: CGI always leaves a signature. )
So, how did the witnesses watch this film of yours? They didn't. I didn't realise how easy it is to fool some truthers into believing in no planes. One must be incredibly uneducated and gullible, but oh, well, that's 9/11 truth all over.
So are you going to take the line that the witnesses saw holograms like other no-planers do? Oops, a question, my bad.
Conclusion: No planers are ignorant and gullible.
Do you need thousands of witnesses to a murder, or will just one do to secure a conviction?
Well, did you see that large hole in the side specifically made so that the building would fall in the intended direction-like felling a tree?
Fact, dear boy, fact. You have offered nothing but your opinion.
Separate names with a comma.