Debunking the illusion that jfk's head moved forward

Discussion in 'JFK' started by 7forever, Aug 15, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    This silly argument has been used by government loyalists for decades but finally it can be shown to be an illusion. His head appears to move forward slightly between 312-313 but what really happens is jfk's bottom skull half gapes open providing this illusion. What these crazies failed to show is someone besides jfk, shot from the rear that goes forward slightly, stops, and violently goes backward. It's impossible on its face but debunking any jfk myth is good because there are so many and this one is used by both conspiracy kooks and WC supporters.

    If you look at the top rear of his head and hair, it never moves forward of the white line. The bottom half of his skull gapes open from front impact causing this illusion that I figured out only two days ago. After two years things keep coming to me and this one is important for both debunking goverment crazies and disinfo idiots who promote two shots to the head.
    [​IMG]

    This capture shows perfectly the rear skull gaped open with the top and bottom on the same vertical level.
    [​IMG]
    Notice that jfk's nose never moves but his head appears to move forward because of the rear starting to break.
    [​IMG]
     
  2. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    What happened is jfk's forehead absorbed the impact making his head kind of straighten before slamming backward. This can be seen in nix also.
    [​IMG]
    Watch his right front kind of contract from impact.
    [​IMG]
     
  3. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The only silly argument is that a gaping wound can create the illusion that his head moved forward.

    Sorry but one has nothing to do with the other in fact your posted images clearly showed that his head did move forward slightly before the wound appeared.

    As with the rest of your empty and false claims this one fails
     
  4. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Of course there's gap in the middle where the exit wound was but the top rear never moves forward of the white line. The exit wound's clearly on the right rear at the moment of front impact.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  5. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The only silly argument is that a gaping wound can create the illusion that any head could move slightly in one direction before reversing violently in the opposite direction.:-D

    Sorry, but one has everything thing to do with the other and in fact the images clearly show that his head did not move forward slightly before the wound appeared.

    As with the rest of your empty and false claims of government support this one fails, as have all the others.:bored:
    [​IMG]
     
  6. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The images clearly show that his head did move forward before going back and to the left.

    Everyone looking at YOUR post sees that his head moves forward of the white line which you placed in the picture. Sorry but you are proven wrong it did move forward consistent with a shot from behind.

    Like all of your claims you simply deny reality to make up an imaginary scenario
     
  7. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    .............................................
     
  8. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Even it did move slightly forward he was still shot from the front. It doesn't matter. I simply showed that his head did NOT move forward, but that his rear skull gaped, providing that illusion.
     
  9. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Everyone looking at the gif sees that the top rear never moves forward. Sorry, but this myth is debunked and his head did not move forward with the fantasy shot from behind.
    [​IMG]
     
  10. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You showed no such thing it moved forward consistent with a shot from behind which the medial evidence proves. He was not shot from the front that is simple fact. Your inane postings cannot refute the medical evidence.

    The gaping wound would not and cannot cause any such illusion.

    Any wound will not cause the illusion of movement in fact a living organism will usually move when wounded there is no illusion about it.
     
  11. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Everyone looking at it sees his head moving forward which is why your entire claim is an outright lie.

    His head moved forward that is the end of it.
     
  12. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Everyone looking at it sees the back of his head gaping and not moving forward which is why your entire claim is an outright lie.:bored:

    His head NEVER moved forward that is the end of it.:bored:
     
  13. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I do have to go to the next level, that's true. But I have learned most everything during my time posting which started in 1-10. I just found the rear gaping at impact a few months ago. So, that shows how much time it took for things to come to me. It was slow motion from gifsoup that revealed the rear gape.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  14. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You showed no such thing it moved forward consistent with a shot from behind which reality confirms is a moot point either way. He was not shot from the rear and that's obvious. Your inane postings cannot refute reality.:bored:

    The gaping wound on the rear would not and did not cause another gaping wound.

    The gaping wound on the rear did cause a very trivial illusion of his head moving forward but that is now debunked by showing the rear gape at the moment of impact.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  15. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They see the gaping wound on the side of his head ( not the back ) and they see his head move forward it is your claim which is an outright lie what I stated is fact, everyone sees it and you know it.

    His head moved forward case closed.
     
  16. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wounds do not cause illusions and this wound is on the side of his head.

    His head moved forward.
     
  17. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    There is only one possibility, the correct one. The rear of his skull gaped causing this illusion that didn't support a shot from the rear anyway. It was a moot point.:bored: The only way I could be wrong about his head NOT moving forward is if it could be proven that jfk did not have an exit wound on the right rear. He clearly did and slow motion has confirmed that.
     
  18. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No they do not they see it move forward and you know it.

    His head moved forward case closed.
     
  19. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is never only one possibility.

    It is fact however that wounds do not cause illusions you also ignore that yoyr effort merely proved his head moved forward.

    He did not have an exit wound on the back of his head which the medical evidence proves.
     
  20. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    There is no possiblity jfk was shot from the front.

    It is a fact however that the rear exit caused an inane illusion that was moot by itself.

    He did have an exit wound on the back of his head which the medical evidence proves.:bored:
     
  21. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes they see it because it did and it is clearly visible you even helped make it visible with a little photo shopping in some of your other posts.

    You know it did as well you just hate inconvenient facts getting in the way.
     
  22. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You are simply ignoring the top back of his head never moves forward debunking this inane illusion.
    [​IMG]

    When a person gets shot in the head the entrance wound is small with the EXIT being larger and irregular. The gaping exit was on the right rear. You know that big red spray is fake because it starts in the right front and then moves to the right side. Sticking to that, the impossibles would have to show an exit on the right front.
    [​IMG]

    All damage is on the right rear with a small fake flap on the right side. The altered Zfilm, autopsy pic, and 40 witnesses debunk the right side exit illusion seen in Zapruder.
    [​IMG]
    The gaping hole on rear seen perfectly.
    [​IMG]
     
  23. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope I am ignoring nothing you are.

    You provided little white lines which clearly and irrefutably show his head INCLUDING THE TOP BACK PART moved forward before the real red spray was caught on film'

    His head is clearly moved FORWARD between frames 312
     
  24. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually head wounds are not all the same not all have an entrance wound that's small and an exit wound which is larger. This may be common but far from universal as any expert will tell you.

    There is no evidence of any kind that the films were altered or some flap or mist was fake.

    No illusion but clear visual fact his head moved forward.
     
  25. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    It does a great job of showing the right rear gaping open...NICE.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page