Delta Air Lines CEO ditches ‘divisive’ COVID vaccine mandate; marks 90% employee vaccination rate

Only if I get it and that is many times less likely if I'm vaccinated.

You consistently misrepresent my positions.

All this folks are dupes?

You can't or won't say how your plan will work. You can't expect vaccinated folks who have taken their chances with the vaccines to cut transmission to accept you keeping the pandemic going snd wrecking the economy.

 

But these respirators you can pick up on Amazon cheap work well.



This would be something people could wear on public transit they seem to be avoiding.

I was shopping yesterday and saw the parking police headed for my car a half-block away. I parked in a 10-minute spot and thought I might get a ticket, so I started running toward my car. I didn't even think about my respirator (the one above) and wasn't out of breath when I reached my car.

 

Yet you can still get it and the data around your claim is all over the place and unreliable. Fact is you can get it and spread it, the only known fact is it protects you and even then perhaps not as well as natural immunity.

no I do not.

my plan has been thoroughly explained and would bring the economy back largely by not imposing artificial restrictions that haven’t worked since the beginning. And the virus being the inconsequential issue it now is and has been for awhile will continue to become less and less relevant without hurting our economy.

 

False, it’s not handpicked or not picky at all, it is a perfect comparison to demonstrate the complete lack of logic the left idea when attacking the nonvaxxed. The logic is the non vaxxed take up more resources, and so do fat people so a mandate to fix it is equally justified. The Vaxx for obesity is eatting right and working out. If you cannot see the similarities in the logic that is your own shortcoming and not my fault. The logic is the same despite your inability to see it. Economic factors are not an issue at all, eating less costs less and working out is free. Just because it’s inherently not a 1 to 1 exact comparison doesn’t mean the element of taking up extra resources isn’t a 1 to 1 comparison. It objectively is. Again, your failed attempt to pretend they aren’t the same is not working.

I can’t help that you are conducting a surface level evaluation and coming to the incorrect conclusion. You can continue to disagree and be wrong, but you are most certainly wrong.

 

You can still infect others even while vaxxed. It’s not your right to force a vaxx on anyone. And you won’t succeed either, atleast not in my area. An area that has done far better than any liberal stronghold. Your authoritarian push isn’t justified by your hyper emotional state.

 

Absurd. The BC data is quite reliable.

But you're less likely to get it and therefore less likely to spread it.

What we do find is that covid infected who get a single mRNA vaccine shot are 50% less likely to be reinfected.

Message number?

Even in states with few or no restrictions (like Texas), the economy suffers when the virus is circulating. If your plan doesn't beat down covid, it won't work.

As I said, you have no plan.

It will only become irrelevant if the circulation goes wayyyyy down or we get a truly effective treatment.

 

No it’s not, it’s quite all over the place and unreliable because of it.

yet you still get it and still spread it. Breakthrough cases be damned lol.

objectively false. The economy suffers from unreasonable restrictions over a virus which is a nonissue. Removing those restrictions sees far more growth for the economy, this is objective fact. Unnecessary shut downs or restrictions hurt the economy which is all you offer. My plan actually works and has been demonstrated to work as areas that are opening up from nonsensical restrictions see actual job and income growth versus those that haven’t.

it is alrdy irrelevant

 

Even when the restrictions are removed, the economy suffers when the virus is circulating.

Only up to a point.

You didn't pay attention to what I wrote.

As I said, you know zip about economics. I doubt you could explain how markets function.

I'm no longer curious as to how absurd your comments will become.

 

False, it suffers far less than when you add unnecessary restrictions. You can disagree but you are objectively wrong.

it simply does


I paid perfect attention your inability to keep up with the conversation is not my fault at all.

I know far more than yourself and have demonstrated that over time. You can delude yourself into thinking otherwise but you are genuinely wrong.

to believe my comments are absurd is to seek only surface level evaluation. I can’t help you, like most on the left, prefer that.

 

The death rate from covid is more than six times as high in Texas as it is in British Columbia, thanks in large measure to the jerk you elected governor.

Do you get it? Six times as high.

 

Nothing here. Beam me up, Scotty!

 

You aren’t making any sense

 

A small number in either case, more die from a variety of issues than covid. Certainly not worth shutting down for.

 

Your pretend economic plan is laughable.

 

69,904 dead is chump change.

British Columbia isn't shut down, btw.

 

To you? Of course not.

 

That many die from a number of other causes l, all of which could equally be used to justify your authoritarian nonsense shutdowns.

 

You simply aren’t formulating rational statements. It’s not making any sense.

 

It’s not pretend or laughable, it’s demonstrated far more effectiveness than irrationally shutting down.

 

Delta is catching the wave of the future. Reason, not mandates.

Dems’ vaccine mandates for police are bound to backfire.

Enough is enough, the wanna-be authoritarians need to hear from us in the upcoming election.