Demolished building defies laws of physics as set by 911

Indeed, the resulting fires did their part as well. in fact, the fire was the main culprit in the weakening of the support of the building.

 

but there was literally no fire as I shown you above. when you are shown pictures proving there were literally no fires and firemen stating there were only a couple small fires and no mention of weak steel you sort of lose all credibility. But then thats not new

 

You did not show that there were "literally no fires." On the contrary you posted an image of smoke pouring out the side of the building. What caused the smoke? Were all the firefighters on cigarette breaks?

 

You're down to contradicting yourself in the same sentence now.

 

You are definitely the gift that keeps on giving koko.

I wonder why Frank De Martini wanted engineers to be brought up to look at the steel if there was actually no mention of weak steel........

http://www.mishalov.com/wtc_portauthoritytranscrip.html

 

Careful there...looks like you're about to rear end your own "credibility".

 

doesnt mean it was an inferno LOL

just left overs from the flash fire.

http://footage.shutterstock.com/cli...dogs-walk-on-piles-of-smoldering-rubbish.html

in fact smoke does not mean it cant be walked upon LOL

http://footage.shutterstock.com/cli...dogs-walk-on-piles-of-smoldering-rubbish.html

another official failure

 

and at the same time they were convincing the ordinary joe citizen that everything will be fine just go back up and back to work.

do you have a certified copy?

 

Anyone else notice that Koko, when confronted by evidence that completely refutes his bull(*)(*)(*)(*), demands certification of evidence, yet he has yet to produce a single shred, much less one that would require certification? This is yet another glaring example of the dual standard of the TBM: Run away from giving evidence (since there isn't any), but hold any evidence provided up to standards impossible to provide. How (*)(*)(*)(*)ing retarded!

 

They did indeed tell people everything will be fine and go back to work.... in the South tower before it was hit. What does that have to do with the North tower? Oh right. You neglected to mention the critical piece of information that it was the other tower, not the tower they were told to go back to work in or the timing since it was before it was known this was a terrorist attack and NOT an accident. I love how truthers like to pretend little things like circumstances and timing have no meaning as long as it back up their silliness.

 

oh well then I guess the gubbermint does not have a case that will hold up in any court of law.

thanks for confirming that for us!





nice one!

WTG

 

oh really? when was it "known" LMAO

 

Actually, at the same time they were doing nothing of the sort. I guess you didn't read the quote I posted.....

And no, I don't have a certified copy. Your healthcare records are not open to the public.

 

yeh I did, its just I was unable to find anything of value in it.

 

Ahhh, there goes Koko, down with his ship; the HMS Truthtard. The standards of evidence you demand are impossible for US to provide. The government not only can but did prove in a court of law that Al Qaeda was behind 9/11. Oh, that's right. You're one of them nutters that thinks there IS no court of law anymore.

 

no they didnt


thanks again for admitting they have NOTHING! LOL

 

Well, let's see.

Who are we going to believe?

Zacharias Moussaoui was tried in a court of law and found guilty of being a member of Al Qaeda and part of the 9/11 attack on the United States. He admitted to being a member of Al Qaeda and part of the attack. These are all facts that are easy to look up and verify.

OR

You can believe Koko who blindly denies everything that shows him up as a fool. Does he offer any evidence his bull(*)(*)(*)(*) is true and that the US government didn't indict, try and convict Zacharias Moussaoui? No. All he gives us is his "good" word.

We all know what Koko's "good" word is for, right? Come springtime it makes an excellent fertilizer and the stench keeps varmits away. Just make sure the garden isn't too close to the house!

Sorry, Koko. Your "good" word isn't worth (*)(*)(*)(*). Nor are your claims that Moussaoui wasn't tried and convicted.

 

You didn't find any value in the fact that someone who was on the 78th floor requested engineers to see some steel he was worried about, or did you not find any value in the fact that the police refused his request because it was too dangerous?

Most likely both, considering the nonsense you wrote.

 

of course anyone who knows anything about law and the american just-us system knows that a good attorney can indict and obtain judgment on a ham sandwhich LMAO

 

Back to the herp derping again koko?

 

Your lack of faith in the US judicial system is immaterial and only proves the twisted nature of your claims. It does NOT prove the government didn't indict, try and convict Zacharias Moussaoui. It also doesn't explain Moussaoui admitting to his being a member of Al Qaeda or part of the 9/11 attacks.

More facts you have to sweep under the rug and hope nobody notices.....

 

well I have to do my very best to make it understandable to the people I am debating with.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Vw2CrY9Igs"]Brawndo[/ame]

 

Again, I don't have access to your healthcare records, so I'm not privy to the conversations you've had with yourself. I'm merely reminding you that occasionally you'll utter out loud and people can hear it.

 

yeh yeh beat someone enough and they will say anything

 

Bump for Jojo.