DeSantis tells CPAC to 'put on full armor of God,' says 'shield of faith' will protect them from the

You forgot “hooker-beating crackhead and prohibited person in possession.”

 

Which political opponent exactly? And since when does being a “political opponent” exempt a person from an investigation into wrongdoing?

 

A PERFECT FRAKKING PHONE CALL

 

You didn’t answer either of my questions.

 

Actually, I did. I am under zero obligation to provide you with answers you like.

 

sad but true

 

I’ll ask again and give you one more chance to answer: http://www.politicalforum.com/index...t-them-from-the.597409/page-8#post-1073286655

There are two questions. One answer is a simple name. The other calls for a factual reply. I’ll wait.

 

Apparently you have no idea what you're talking about. That's what happens when you jimp into a discussion you haven't been following.

The article I linked to was responding to this statement: "sooner or later everything gets explained when science uncovers the reality."

Next time pay attention.

 

And I repeat:

Both questions WERE answered. You don't get to dictate the format or content. I don't spoon feed. Deal with it.

 

Fallacy, onus probandi.

And I stated anyone who would make such a claim doesn’t understand science. I fail to see the problem here.

 

You did not answer either question. Stop pretending you did. You made a claim — you should be able to back it up or concede the point. What are you afraid of? Just answer my two very simple questions.

 

I didn't choose an elf lol.

 

Just a reminder, here's what you said: "the objective of science is not to “explain everything.”

 

And they now aew appealing to Patriotism, secure borders, and arming citizens in Ukraine.

Think of how awkward it's gonna be when that's over with.

 

Yes. And?

 

Refer to post #185

 

Please stop playing games. Are you here for a good faith discussion or not?

 

What, no more snarky logical fallacies comments?

If you had followed the thread you'd have seen I've engaged in good faith discussion all along.

 

Both questions WERE answered. You don't get to dictate the format or content. I don't spoon feed. Deal with it.

 

If you wish not to have your argument criticized for errors in logic, do not post errors in logic.

I asked you a very simple question, to clarify your remarks. You refused. Concession accepted.

 

Concession accepted.

 

I conceded nothing. The thread is there for you to review. Find for yourself what you ask for, I don't jump to your demands.

 

Of course you did: You refused to answer a simple question. You hence withdrew from the discussion. I graciously accepted your concession. We are done here. Or you can answer the simple question. Entirely up to you.

 

Funny how they made that last part just go away huh?

If he was a normal person his ass would be sitting in prison for it

 

I heard he was so offended by the Russian invasion, he sent a million dollars back to Putin.