I would like to discuss my views on how to 'develop economies.' If you were to look at American and German history, there is plan there to develop economies step by step. The way I see it, America and Germany are so developed because they employ so many people. This was the focus of the parliamentarians and they put forward long forgotten strategies, that have been recorded in library headlines in newspapers, to employ more people. This led to more jobs being provided, or, a few, more taxes based on those jobs, more infrastructure being developed, more jobs, more taxes, and, so forth. If the developing world was to sell land near the city, something not often thought of for cultural reasons, where land is only bought by investors because they want it - I am talking about lowering prices to attract investment - there would be a surge of people buying up property to have zoned and developed around the city, with new land being 'considered around the city.' This would see the cities expand quickly, and, there are only useful things to be done with those developing parameters.
Germany and development? Perhaps start by stopping agricultural subsidies and imposing neoliberal conditions in preferential trade agreements
Actually Socialist China employed 1 billion and they were all starving to death. When they switched to Republican capitalism they instantly eliminated 40% of the entire planet's poverty. Now do you understand what causes development??
Your support for dictatorship is neither sensible or relevant (given industrial policy to support infant industry is alien to right wing rant)
china has no industrial policy it competes successfully in 500,000 different products that the govt could never keep track of and if it tried it would only screw things up
It continues to have industrial policy. Why do you think Trump pitches them as the great evil as a means to manipulate the nationalistic plebs?
Under real industrial policy 60 million slowly starved death in China, under Republican capitalism they are all getting rich
I already know you worship a country which displays terrible human rights abuses. No need to bore me with the blubbering.
Would you want the same human rights abuses in the US? You don't seem to mind government coercion at all.
The greatest human rights abuse in human history is lib communism which slowly starved 120 million to death. Now you can understand why our founding geniuses made libcommie statism illegal in America
of course not but those abuses are trivial compared to the abuse of libcommieism that slowly starved 60 million human souls to death.
Calling human rights abuses trivial perhaps demonstrates the authoritarian personality that inflicts the right...
yes, a few deaths from human rights abuses in the course of saving a billion people from libcommie en masse starvation is trivial. Do you understand now?
Translation: you’re afraid to make about. If you see a conservative I has to run from the debate? What does that teach you?
When someone can't even understand what they've written, the chance of debate falls to zero. The amusing aspect of course is that all of the tiger economies have applied interventionism that you'd call 'libcommie'. Why? Because free market economics is destructive and infant industries have to be protected.
you should get an MBA and get a real job! What's an industry??. Was some libcommie fascist bureaucrat going to protect Bezos when he wanted to sell books on internet? If they did he's still be a bookseller. Was some LCF going to protect Gates when he thought there was no money in operating systems? Jobs when he wanted to invent a phone?? Musk when he wanted to compete with GM and Toyoto??? What a commie like you knows about business is 0!! I have no doubt you too would slowly starve 60 million if given half the chance.
No thanks. I think I'll stay being my own boss. There is no coherent comment in this. The infant industry hypothesis isn't difficult to understand, it's a mere reference to learning economies and the nature of dynamic comparative advantage.
obviously boss of nothing who knows far less than nothing. Pure libcommie Stalinist ignorance cubed! Who knew the computer business better than Gates yet the internet happened right under his nose, and you think a Nazifascist bureaucrat knew what industry to protect?. This is day one kindergarten in MBA school and in real life in industry after industry !! Sad!
