Downsizing Living Space

Discussion in 'Law & Justice' started by Flanders, Jul 15, 2014.

  1. Flanders

    Flanders Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    2,589
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Fredrick_Douglass_Housing_Project_Towers_2010.jpg

    Crime-ridden inner-city housing projects are palaces compared to this:

    I always forget to list HUD as one the most of the most destructive Communism-oriented federal bureaucracies. I suspect that HUD has plans to build smaller packing crates for the homeless, too.

    Cramming Americans into tiny living spaces to appease environmental freakazoids makes me wonder if HUD coordinates its activities with the EPA’s agenda?


    Downsizing living space is only the beginning. So even if you live in a packing crate your energy bill will skyrocket:

    And naturally the hand of the United Nations can be found in everything that lowers living standards for working Americans:

    Does anyone want to argue that the EPA is NOT a de facto United Nations agency implementing the UN’s environmental agenda?

    Or argue that the people cited in this final excerpt from Dr. Paugh’s piece do NOT provide the UN’s environmental muscle at the same time they are creating crowded conditions in our cities with tens of millions of illegal aliens and millions more to come:


    If you happen to be a little slow on the uptake —— NO —— is the answer to Dr. Paugh’s question. Here’s another question: How come Democrats never preach class and economic warfare against those people?

    Taqiyya the Liar is finally being exposed for what he is. When he is called out on anything he says he is faithfully executing the office of president. The only way to cut through his doublespeak is to think 1984: “War is peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is strength.”

    Incidentally, Democrats invented a living Constitution while they were screaming “settled law” out of the other side of their hypocritical mouths. Example: Roe v. Wade is settled law after a mere 40 years, while more than 40,000, and counting, gun control laws say the Second Amendment is not settled law after more than two centuries. I can only assume bureaucratic regulations are settled law, too.

    Bottom line: Settled law is obviously not a living thing, yet it is not subject to repeal like laws or constitutional amendments if you believe Democrats.

    Finally, the evil gunslinger who was The Terror of Tiny Town in an entertaining movie has been replaced by Socialism’s ideology. The UN does not need a gunslinger. Tiny town designed by Democrats is itself terrifying and not the least bit entertaining:


     

Share This Page