Dr Wood's claim that 80% of the steel from the towers was turned to dust.

Discussion in '9/11' started by Fangbeer, Jun 18, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Emmanuel_Goldstein

    Emmanuel_Goldstein New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your question is designed to obscure the truth. Dr. Judy Wood does not mention "beams from space dustifying most of the WTC towers" in her textbook.

    I'm Emmanuel Goldstein and I approve this message.
    :strong:
     
  2. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,699
    Likes Received:
    1,081
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Interesting. Perhaps you are unfamiliar with Dr Wood's work? This thread is not about her textbook. It's about her claim that 80% of the steel from the towers was turned to dust by a space based directed energy weapon.

    http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam1.html


    Wood does claim that "beams from space "dustified" most of the WTC towers." And that is precisely the language and vocabulary that she uses to make this claim. Maybe you should read her textbook?
     
  3. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are you honestly saying she's never posted any of her views outside of her fiction book?....We KNOW what she's said,I'm beginning to wonder however if YOU know.
     
  4. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nice. Ask for the forensic evidence you claim to have and all you do is try to push a piece of crap book on us. No deal. This is a debate forum, not a book store, although I can see why you push books here. Bookstores have standards that Wood's craptastic book just doesn't meet. That in and of itself is pretty remarkable given that their standards are "will someone buy it". :lol:

    It has been duly noted by me and everyone else reading this thread that your claims are fradulant, you can't back them up, and your attempts at being a snake oil salesman are an abysmal failure. Good luck getting someone to buy a book you can't even pluck a single instance of true "forensic evidence" out of to prove your claims. Only a retard of epic proportions would believe the book has any actual value when the salespeople can't even begin to defend it. :lol:
     
  5. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hey. Let's not get carried away here, Dave. I was merely pointing out an observation that I had made. So I brought up his posting history. I broke rule #whatever in doing so, my bad. But I do not recall doing any of the underlined.

    But do say -- do you believe in anything OTHER THAN the official version of things?
     
  6. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,699
    Likes Received:
    1,081
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do you need a mod to explain to you how to start your own threads? For the last time, please stop trying to hijack this one with your own subjects.
     
  7. Emmanuel_Goldstein

    Emmanuel_Goldstein New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am very familiar with Dr. Judy Wood's overwhelming, conclusive, and indisputable EVIDENCE that leads to the conclusion of a Directed Energy Weapon "dustifiing" the World Trade Center complex because I have read her textbook. She has NEVER made a claim that the World Trade Center complex was turned to dust by a SPACED BASED directed energy weapon. Site the the Chapter, section, and page number where you CLAIM she states this. You won't be able to because she doesn't. But then, your job is to protect the perpetrators and obscure the truth with falsehoods and disinformation by gaslighting supporters of Dr. Wood's overwhelming, conclusive, and indisputable EVIDENCE that leads to the conclusion of a Directed Energy Weapon "dustifiing" the World Trade Center complex.

    The truth does not depend on who supports it. Truth is not a club or a matter of “opinion” or "belief". Neither is truth a political or economic objective. Truth doesn’t have sides. The truth is singular and the truth is unifying. By reading Dr. Wood's research and collection of evidence as compiled in her textbook the truth is known, so there is no need to "Re-investigate 9/11". If you want unity, then seek the truth by reading her textbook. If you were assigned to do a book report, would you read the book or rely on rumors, conjecture, and uninformed opinions from other people? This isn't about beliefs, it is about evidence.

    Now those that have read her textbook know the truth. Those covering it up should be held accountable. After all, it is the cover up that has enabled what has transpired since 9/11, not what happened on 9/11. So the cover up of 9/11 has been a far worse crime than 9/11 itself. Remember, the truth is known and is knowable. What should be done about those covering it up?

    I'm Emmanuel Goldstein and I approve this message.
    :strong:
     
  8. Emmanuel_Goldstein

    Emmanuel_Goldstein New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gaslighting and gang stalking supporters of Dr. Judy Wood will not make the overwhelming, conclusive, and indisputable EVIDENCE that leads to the conclusion of a Directed Energy Weapon "dustifing" the World Trade Center complex go away. I'm sure Zachary Goldman, David Golove, Stephen Holmes, Richard Pildes, and Samuel Rascoff would agree with me.

    I'm Emmanuel Goldstein and I approve this message.
    :strong:
     
  9. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Interesting that you say this. You claim to be very familiar with the evidence, but cannot point out any single piece of evidence. Yet more proof the book isn't even worth the match needed to burn it. :lol:
     
  10. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    More waffling from you and still no evidence. All you can do is throw around insults and pretend your precious bible is worth something. It isn't even good enough to be in bookstores where the only criteria is that someone has to be stupid enough to buy it. I guess that is why she has to have people like you peddling her book out on the internet. :lol: I wonder if she will ever even break even on her costs. Probably not. Truthers tend to be retards and retards have a hard time coming up with even the money needed to buy a book. :lol:
     
  11. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,699
    Likes Received:
    1,081
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The blue text in my post is called a hyperlink. The hyperlink is an active form of text that is clickable to allow you to be directed to other content hosted outside of the post. The specific hyperlink in my post happens to direct users to a site moderated and approved by Dr Wood. If you had clicked it, you would have been directed to her paper titled:

    The Star Wars Beam Weapons
    and
    Star Wars Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW)
    (A focus of the Star Wars Program)

    by
    Dr. Judy Wood and Dr. Morgan Reynolds
    (originally posted: October 17, 2006)


    Perhaps you should read it.

    Great, then stop complaining about "gaslighting" and answer the question I asked. Your answer should help us to have a better understanding of the truth. Should it not?
     
  12. Emmanuel_Goldstein

    Emmanuel_Goldstein New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Very good question about iron oxide. Because kinetic energy was not involved and there was no oxidation process going on. However, there was evidence of rapid rustification, transmutation, and bending of steel without stress cracking all of which indicate a Directed Energy Weapon "dustified" the World Trade Center complex.
    http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/

    I could write much more but I need to get to the gym.

    I'm Emmanuel Goldstein and I approve this message.
    :strong:
     
  13. Emmanuel_Goldstein

    Emmanuel_Goldstein New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Perhaps you should stop giving ordering to supporters of Dr. Judy Wood like you are military personnel. No where does Dr. Wood say that a space based weapon "dustified" the World Trade Center complex. This is disinformation used to hide the truth. End of story


    I'm Emmanuel Goldstein and I approve this message.
    :strong:
     
  14. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This right here proves beyond any doubt that EG's posts are complete bull(*)(*)(*)(*) and he has absolutely NO CLUE as to what he is writing about. He claims no oxidation is going on, but there is "rustification". :lol: Oxidation is the process by which steel rusts. Coming up with a fake word to describe the exact same process you claim DIDN'T happen is hilarious!!! Steroids do more than shrink the testicles; they shrink the mind as well! Just sayin....
     
  15. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Perhaps you should learn the English language. When one says a statement like "Perhaps you should read it", that is not an order. That is a recommendation. "Read it!" would be an order. Fangbeer is trying to help you out because your posts prove beyond any doubt that not only do you not know the information you pretend you do, but that you're not even willing to learn your own material. You should be grateful to Fangbeer for taking such an interest in your credibility that he would try to help you out. Instead you pretend he is giving you orders while you restate a blatant lie easily proven to be a lie if you follow Fangbeer's link. Maybe you should have followed his advice instead of gone to the gym. The mind needs excercise too. ;-)
     
  16. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,699
    Likes Received:
    1,081
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, it is.

    Is this what Dr. Wood taught you? It's horribly incorrect. All objects with a temperature above absolute zero have kinetic energy. In fact, temperature is a direct measurement of kinetic energy. Unless you are trying to suggest that the temperature in the vicinity of the towers was absolute zero, (a condition that cannot exist on the Earth) then it's clear that kinetic energy was involved.

    Another issue with your sentence fragment of an answer is that the energy of the oxidation reaction comes from the chemical bonds between 4 atoms of iron and 6 atoms of oxygen. The formula is, 4 Fe + 3 O2 ---> 2 Fe2O3. This is an exothermic reaction that takes place at room temperature. Additional kinetic energy is not needed to precipitate the reaction. It generates its own.

    If, as Judy suggests, steel from the buildings was finely divided then what she's really saying is that large amounts of Fe was exposed to environmental oxygen. If this did indeed happen, then the two elements would have reacted with each other quite dynamically. There should have been a massive release of energy due to this reaction. We did not witness this massive release of energy. Does Wood have any theory at all how the natural reaction of iron and oxygen could have been prevented? Because really, your sentence fragment does not answer the question at all.

    Rust is the result of the oxidation reaction. Rustification is not a word. Directed energy weapons are not at all required for iron to rust. Iron is highly attracted to oxygen. All it takes is exposure and enough heat for iron to bond with oxygen. As I said, the heat required is satisfied by room temperature. In samples with a large mass, the heat of the reaction is conducted away from the reaction allowing a passivation layer to form. The passivation layer "protects" the rest of the iron in the sample from exposure to oxygen. If you heat the sample, then spaces between the crystal lattice of iron increase allowing more exposure to oxygen. The hotter you get a sample, the faster it will rust.
     
  17. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How can you take anyone seriously that uses a word like 'Rustification'?
     
  18. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
  19. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What would the massive release of energy look like?
     
  20. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
  21. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    better question probably would be,what would it FEEL like


    hot.
     
  22. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
  23. Emmanuel_Goldstein

    Emmanuel_Goldstein New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I can understand why you would be confused. But, since you have never read Dr. Judy Wood's textbook that would understandable. The rapid rustification I referenced was an after effect of a Directed Energy Weapon "dustifing" the World Trade Center complex. I was not discussing rustification in reference to the immediate destruction.

    I'm Emmanuel Goldstein and I approve this message.
    :strong:

     
  24. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Have YOU actually read her work of fiction,manny?...
     
  25. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You just perfectly described what Hannibal has been talking about, yet you still can't explain why we didn't see the effects of "rustification". Once again you prove your posts are worthless and your claims are baseless. Better luck next time.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page