Drag Queen Flashes Crotch To Kids At Library Story Hour

No offense, but you should try telling the truth about people's posts. At least try. It doesn't take much. No one has supported adults exposing themselves to children. The fact that you have to pretend they have speaks volumes.

 

Pick one. You can't have both.

 

Most gay people just want to be left alone so we can exist in peace.
Don’t want to bake us a cake — fine, it hurts a little but we wont make a big fuss, we will go to another baker.
Don’t want to provide medical treatment to our children because of who we love — fine, it hurts a little but we wont make a big fuss, we will go to another doctor.
Don’t believe we should have children — fine, it hurts a little but we wont make a big fuss, we will go about our lives.

Equal treatment under the law however, many of us will fight for that.

I don’t understand the extreme hatred of gay people, how can you say you are not anti-gay but then say we should have less rights than a drunken teenager marrying someone they just met in vegas or someone on their fifth marriage? That we shouldn’t be around children?

 

Yet they removed the statues from public property because people objected. The wishes of many tax payers were overruled in that case. Why the double standard?

 

I didn’t agree with removing statues.

As for the reasoning, the voices against them were louder than the voices for them.

 

Is it fake news? If so prove it.

Doesn't need to be. Just because you can't see anything in an image doesn't mean there wasn't any exposure.

All you have proven was that the image wasn't blurred.

transparent strawman fallacy. I never said anybody molested anybody. Try reading and comprehending better in the future.

Drag is preforming arts, a show as it were, where people portray characters. It isn't attire. So no idea what you are talking about.

Who is us? What are the Republicans calling "us"?

 

Already done

Lack of evidance or a police report shows there was no exposure.
If you have some new evidence feel free to post it.

So if the image was not blurred the OP is a lie (like most of his posts)

Why bring up molestation then?

So no, not upset because of bikinis or gymnastic uniforms, but upset over leggings. And y’all call liberals emotional train wrecks

I sourced the article and the phrase.
You even quoted it.

Talk about reading comprehension, sheesh...

 

So taxpayers were overruled. This is a public library. Their objection to exposing children to trannies is reasonable. Go do that on private property!

The problem I see is that those objecting will be called homophobes.

 

Drag queen story time isn't about being left alone. It's crap like this that makes people say things. And you defending it contributes to the problem.

 

Why is it reasonable? That was the initial question.
There was reason behind the statue removal — history — which is the same reason I didn’t support removing most of them.
Deleting our history typically allows it to repeat.
What is the reasonable objection to exposing children to these types of performers?

And “trannies” are not always homosexual, so unless you are wanting to ban only the gay ones or you mistakenly believe that all transexuals are homosexual — homophobic would not be an accurate descriptor.

 

I am pointing out lies and am defending nothing.
Sorry if you don’t like it.

Most of the people against drag queens hate you also, so don’t feel left out. (And they hated you long before stuff like this occurred)
Or are you delusional enough to believe if stuff like this vanished they would stop throwing us in with pedophiles?

 

Gosh, I'm older than dirt and I never heard of any drag queen storyteller in any library.

 

Don't be absurd.

To point out things that are perversion that I can criticize. You inferred that I shouldn't criticize drag queen story time because at one time I would have been arrested. I brought up objectively criticize able things to see at what point you think a gay man should criticize things. Since you think there is some form of hypocrisy here. Otherwise you wouldn't have said that.

Again with the dishonesty. Drag performances aren't just clothing. I don't know why you insist on being dishonest about this. Drag is a performance art.

It isn't really reading comprehension on your part it's deliberate mischaracterization, or dishonesty. I told you once it wasn't about clothing than you insisted a second time that it's about clothing.

This is a standard among leftists that hold an indefensible position. Like criticism of Islam is about hating Arab people or the desire to curb illegal immigration is about hatred of Hispanic people.

You have to frame it this way because your logic fails.

I've been to drag shows, I enjoy them. But they are not for children. That's my reasonable position that you are attempting to twist into some 1950s pointy Hood bullshit because you know you are wrong and you resort to attacking my character.

This is as transparent as it can possibly be.

 

How does my logic fail because I pointed out that the OP is a lie?
I posted evidence of such from the original source, researched if any police report had been filed for exposure (it hasn’t) — this isn't a drag show like you have been exposed to, its a person in drag reading a book. A character. A performer.

Like I have already said, I don’t care if they ban drag queens or even gay people from these events — just be honest about the reasoning.

You asserted there was exposure as a means to hold your position, where is the proof?

 

My view of gays was formed years ago when a kid in our neighborhood was molested by a young teen from our street. The kid who was molested was about 8 or 9 and the teen probably 13. If. Emory serves me correctly the kid who was molested was fondled by the teen. What made me remember the incident is that the molester's father used to sit on the front porch all day since he was " disabled" and collecting "his due" as he called it. I recall this guy ( the father) because he acted and spoke as if he was better than everyone else. This guy told us that "Coloreds" we lazy and the few good one were good if they "knew their place". He pretty much said the same about immigrants DP's ( Displacec Persons) but that we were "not lazy lie coloreds" and knew our place. Rumor was that he was hurt as a fireman so he knew coos. This guy bragged about how his family came here on the Mayflower.
His son it was said had molested other kids and got away with it. Finally some older kids teens from another neighborhood near by one being a relative cousin I think waited for the molester to walk home from school. He the molester was in 8th grade. The older kids were in highschool. They jumped him by "the woods" as we called it and beat him pretty well.
Since the father had connections I recall police came around asking all of us if we knew who beat up the molester. That summer after school ended we moved away since my parents bought their first house in a far edge of the city with all single family homes it was just like a Suburbs. I never ran into any kids from that old neighborhood so the molesting prevent probably went on a crime spree into adulthood.

So I know that you will say that the pervert I knew was a exception. I believe that to be so since it cannot be that gays who molest are the majority.

Yet the guy who I told you about from my childhood got away Scott free with maybe just that one beating. Do you understand how those of us who knew about things that perve did are sick that way too many perversion got away with molesting kids.

 

In defense of drag queen story time. You can lie to yourself and believe it but I'm not going to.

with all the stupid assumptions you make, you are not one iota different than the people you criticize. I married a man that did drag. We still go to those shows, they are fun. But they are adult.

Who are you talking about?

Islamic people? The NIFB?

You far left people are defending Islam attacking any body that criticizes it as islamophobic Despite the fact that they actively support extermination of gays. You are what you claim other's to be. You are in the side of the haters.

 

No it's all the lies and misrepresentations you have to tell to argue against my point.

Such as the crap you made up about me hating drag queens.

And then pretending that it's all about attire.

This is to justify attacking my character Because you can't address my argument.

If you want to talk about the op post responses to the op.

 

So child molesters are Aokay with you as long as they are heterosexual?

If not, in order to have a consistent opinion you would have to think they shouldn't be around children either.

 

I have never defended Islam
You have zero idea what you are speaking of.

Drag shows are not fun, they are disgusting in my experience as are the people in the costume, again — in my experience.

So you retract your statement that there was exposure? I can’t tell from all the back and forth.

 

I can understand being angry about nepotism or corruption. I can even understand having a negative view on gay people because of that. However, you must be able to understand other perspectives. I'm not saying that a child molester is ever riotous, I'm just saying that that doesn't represent gay people any more than pedophile priests represent Catholics. I understand not liking the Catholic Church or being leery around Catholics. That doesn't mean I think no Catholic priest or any other religious leader should ever be around children.

 

You are the one that jumped in saying you can see his “wedding tackle” whatever that is and I am saying “there's a conspiracy to try and make perverts look like perverts”. So I am addressing you.

What argument would you like me to address, you are all over the place.
Specific argument please.

 

Okay. As a parent, I don't believe my child should view men dressed as women and I shouldn't have to be the one to leave.
What term would you use?

 

I will let you hunt down an uncensored picture.

 

So you have never once insinuated that someone was islamophobic? If you have you are defending Islam.

So you hate drag queens and projected you character flaws onto me?

That is the opposite of trying to be a good person.

im not so sure that there wasn't. You said you proved there wasn't but that was a lie.

 

So your views of gay people were brought about by a child (13 years old) allegedly molesting a boy three or four years younger than him?
And you remember this event because his father was a piece of ****?
And the police investigated but didn’t charge him — but he was beaten up in the woods — and ‘probably’ went on a crime spree even though you never heard of any crime spree?

And gays shouldn’t be allowed to marry or be around children because of the above?

Jesus ****ing christ, I really have no words