EXCLUSIVE: CA High School Teacher Caught Soliciting Underage Boy

And yet it isn't. I know, you didn't read that part. But who cares, you got your dig in, and wasn't that the only point here? Is that why you feel government is your only option as a religion?

 

It's not?
I think we both know that I can cite that part of the bible, that's rather negative about homosexuals.

 

And I can cite the part where it suggests that we simply love. Again, why ignore that part? I can cite the part that suggests that you could be stoned for mixing your textiles. Can you find a new testament version? I cannot. So what is your actual point? The point, as noted already, is to derail a conversation because you only believe in government as your religion. So, no competition allowed in your world. right?

 

All I saw was a man being attacked for no reason. Quintessential lynch mob stuff

You'll probably attack me now for saying that

 

Because the church has a rather totally negative view for the entire LGBTQ+ society since ever and ignore that love part. That's why.

 

Which church? You paint with a pretty broad brush here. Why do you want folks to accept your version here? So they will only ever want government as their religion?

 

That just shows what I said. That obviously, some Christians think this. But prove to me that this is the stance of most Christians.

No to mention that this true if we are talking about children transitioning. If a child has the power of consent to to make an irreversible decision of undergoing sex change and have genital mutilation be preformed on him, then he can consent to anything. Because that's as extreme as it gets. Compared to that, consenting to having sex is such a big deal.

You do realize that the studying that came up with this number spans 70 year? I'm not going to waste type doing proper math. So I'll do an even split. Let's say that there 300,000 cases world wide between 1950 to 2020. That's 70 years. 300,000/70 is roughly 4,286

There are around 1.3 Catholics around the world.

4,286/ 1.3 billion is a rate of 0.00000329692%
This means that you are 3 times more likely to be struck by lightning than get raped by a catholic.

If we use Christians as a whole (2.2 billion globally), that number goes down even further.

And as stated, the super small minority gets called out and condemned instantly by the Catholic community at large.

Unlike with transgenders who endorse this. Defend this. And call anyone a bigot for criticizing this.




Notice the difference between the reaction to such behavior?

If this was a picture of some catholic, he would be denounced right away. Unlike Trangers who defend it. And instead attack anyone who criticizes this.

Will you even condemn this?

 

Well, that tells us the sexual orientation of the offender and victims, and still you dont know the sex or sexual orientation of those who took the poll. AND YOU were making assertions regarding those who answered the poll, not the victim and victimizer.

 

Yes, the old testament called for the stoning of sinners. And then Jesus came and said,
Teacher,” they said to Jesus, “this woman was caught in the act of adultery. 5 The law of Moses says to stone her. What do you say?(old testament)”
6 They were trying to trap him into saying something they could use against him, but Jesus stooped down and wrote in the dust with his finger. 7 They kept demanding an answer, so he stood up again and said, “All right, but let the one who has never sinned throw the first stone!” 8 Then he stooped down again and wrote in the dust.
9 When the accusers heard this, they slipped away one by one, beginning with the oldest, until only Jesus was left in the middle of the crowd with the woman. 10 Then Jesus stood up again and said to the woman, “Where are your accusers? Didn’t even one of them condemn you?”
11 “No, Lord,” she said.
And Jesus said, “Neither do I. Go and sin no more......”"

"For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ...Therefore let us not judge one another anymore, but rather resolve this, not to put a stumbling block or a cause to fall in our brother's way."

 

you are reaching....

 

exactly

Christians really need to read their bible more...... ironically, he also mentions Simon not giving him a kiss...

Then he turned toward the woman and said to Simon, “Do you see this woman? I came into your house. You did not give me any water for my feet, but she wet my feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair. 45 You did not give me a kiss, but this woman, from the time I entered, has not stopped kissing my feet. 46 You did not put oil on my head, but she has poured perfume on my feet. 47 Therefore, I tell you, her many sins have been forgiven—as her great love has shown. But whoever has been forgiven little loves little.”

moral of the story... don't be a simple Simon.... IE the Homophobes

but then again this thread is about children, not adults

 

How dare you assume their genders!!

 

Do you comprehend the difference between dressing up and child rape? Because you seem to be blurring the lines.

I don’t think you will find many people in the LGBT community that condone child rape but you saying that them refusing to condemn dressing up or appropriate sex education being equivalent to what the church has done is disturbing.

Getting mad about right wing religious bigots banning all representation for entire communities is appropriate imo.

 

Dress up?

Look. Even you make excuses for them and down play their actions. Lol

Notice the difference between this and dress up










The fact that you won't even condemn it says alot

 

Can you tell me which of these is worse than what one would see at a public beach in terms of clothing?

You also didn’t answer the question. Do you comprehend the difference between dressing up and child rape? Because you seem to be blurring the lines.

I have a ton of family that live in areas where nudity is less… upsetting… than it is in the US. I am able to differentiate between that and sexual activity.

That you are giggling so much on this topic show a ton about your agenda here.

You have posted a picture of a child with a nude individual, not necessarily sexual. A child in a wig, not sexual unless one is a pedophile. A male in a wig reading to children in a full body spandex undergarment so they do not expose themselves. A drag performer in a sexual pose but the event is not identified, the people visible are adults. The only one that is even remotely concerning is the last one but again isn’t necessarily sexual.

I think anyone that finds these pictures sexual are either trying to push an agenda or have issues they need to work out themselves.

Religious people not only didn’t condemn the thousands of actual attacks on children, many of them ignored it and continue to donate to these organizations.

You have pictures with no context of non-sexual activity while I have thousands of court cases with actual victims.

Bigotry is a disease of the mind.

 

The excuses keep coming. No condemnation. Just defense.

Thanks for making my point


Suddenly, story time for toddlers in libraries and kids in elementary schools, became just like going to the public beach. The teachers shouldve just all worn bikinis.


And yeh. This is just like going to the beach

 

You do realize neither of these photos are in public right? Nude beaches exist even in America, don’t they?

So are you upset about these individuals in schools or are you now wanting to arrest people in private settings because you seem to be jumping around quite a bit.

More giggling while seeing these photos as sexual — troubling.

 

Thats my point.

But keep talking about nudist beaches when we're talking about events geared towards little kids. At schools and public libraries. Yeh. Those places are just like nudist beaches.


Shows where your mind is at. And to what extend you are willing to go to cover for groomers. Even comparing nudist beaches to elementary schools.

 

Which of your favorite photos that you keep reposting are at a school or library?

The one with the fully dressed person?
What do the other photos have to do with school?

 

The church that preaches the bible. The bible contains:
"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them."

 

Oh. Now that you finished embarrassing yourself by defendeding and proving excuses for these groomers. And down playing it by comparing elementary schools to nudist beaches. You decided to switch the goal post back to the original point of discussion










Oh. And this is a fine standard for a teacher. A perverted man who wear a giant fake breast Halloween costume. Teaching kids.





Yep. It's completely fiiiinnne.


Convicted sex offenders holding “drag queen story time” at Texas libraries

Over the past year, the Austin Public Library in Texas has allowed sex offenders to read to children during “Drag Queen Story Time,” a pro-family organization has learned. This is the latest development in a series of related findings this year.

At least three Texas sex offenders have participated in “Drag Queen Story Time” — programs that seek to teach children about gender fluidity and give them “queer” role models through reading events in public libraries.

https://metrovoicenews.com/convicted-sex-offenders-holding-drag-queen-story-time-at-texas-libraries/

No condemnation to these people yet? I won't hold my breath. You won't even condemn the most extreme example of what's allowed to take place with children. And instead just run interference. So some male stripper who dressed as a women doing erotic dances in a public library for kids story time is probably completely fine with you. As well as male prostitutes.

 

Aha...
I need to prove what the stance of the Catholics are that they rather massively aided, financially supported and covered up pedophilia in their church.
But you do not need to prove what the stance is of all transgenders, since you can post the same pictures over and over.

I don't think so.
It's totally fair for me that I also do not need to prove my point, and that you just need to accept how I am portraying Catholics as the pedo supporters that they are.

 

That's about the sin of adultery. It's rather straightforward what the idea is for the gay homosexual. And it's not relevant it's in the old testament. The view about the gays by Christians, if it's negative, is directly related from what they learned from the old testament.

 

I condemn sexual abuse — no, I don’t condemn drag queens but rather actions of the individual.

Your first image doesn’t show any children
Your second image shows a fully dressed individual
Your third image appears to be an office setting, no children
Your fourth image has three images and the only one with children in it is a fully overdressed individual
No children in your fifth image

Per your source, People on the registry are barred from these types of events and were subsequently charged as such — thankfully those individuals were not prior child predators but had been arrested for prostitution (still shouldn’t be around children). I am glad the single library this has happened at now does criminal background checks to prevent it going forward.

It’s fascinating you want to freak out about these events with zero instances of child abuse, to the extent you want them barred nation wide but you are fine with organizations that openly hide child rapists existing.

Do you really think you are fooling anyone that isn’t already a fool?

 

So you can prove your statement.

And look over your head! There again goes another strawman

I never made that claim about trangeders. It you who keep defending the cases that I bring up. As well as the grooming behavior. Mayhe instead I should be worrying about you.

I made a factual stalemate. That the trans community. And you included. Refuses to condem this behavior. If you refuse to condemn such behavior, then you either find it OK. Or agree with it. Agree to men dressing up as women, teaching our kids about sex.

This is disturbing.

Men who appropriate womanhood and make a mockery out of it by wearing exaggerated costumes, should definitely be teaching little girls about their sexualy. Not

Going further

Back then, white people used to dress up in an exaggerated costume and paint their faces black. Whether they intended to or not, this mocks the image of a black man. Which is why its not acceptable

Today, men dress up in an exaggerated customer and put on makeup I'm order to look like a woman. Whether they intend to or not, this mocks the image of a woman. Which is why it shouldn't be acceptable.