Facebook blocks Press TV advertisements

Erm evidence would make it real. Ever heard of that?

Oh, I forgot, we are not in a court of law, so any claims are true because you tube says so.

 

Big deal, Liebe.

 

Don't get sarcastic, Liebe, no need for it.

I am well aware of what evidence is, yes.

Perhaps you could enlighten the Jews who pay no mind to the need for it, when they are running amok.

And here was my statement..


I stand by this statement;

Both are owned by private business and billionaire crooks, like Goldman Sachs or Sheldon Aldeson. (Obama & Romney)

Then these backers put up the two puppets.

Prove me wrong.

I declared that a Jew, Sheldon Aldeson, is Romney's biggest backer, and that one of the first changes Rabbi Mitt would make, would save Rabbi Sheldon a shed load of money.

And that Goldman Sachs were Obama's largest single donator in the last election, and they also funded McCain.

And ALL of them must be Kosher approved, by the legion that is AIPAC.

Are you seriously denying this stuff?

 

Not at all. A capitalised term is a defined term. A defined term is something you can actually specify. Can you specify what you mean or will you keep throwing out unsubstantiated bigotry and racism, raging against the imaginary Organised Spiders?

 

Okay.

I am bored now, and off to make coffee.

 

Sarcasm is a wonderful tool, exposing ridiculous arguments. And it isn't against any rules, so youll need to deal with it.

A bit like how you claim that joos "pay no mind for the need of it" when I have asked for your evidence of the reality as you see it. You deflect by citing a jooo. Surprise! Surprise!

I will not prove you wrong in your unsubstaniated claims. You will need to prove your claim, not me dissprove your claim that has no basis.

Kinda like the joos are a different species theory that you never evidenced. You asked me to dissprove that nonsense too.

I am not interested in the actions of "a Jew" or "a Muslim" or a "a Christian" or a "a Woman" or a "Black man" or a " a Chinaman". None of their actions can be said to be extraploated to an entire ethnic, religious or any other group. Why can you not follow that? You need to prove numbers.

That is what is meant by evidence. If you say 1000 organised joos rules the world, you need to prove that.

 

So you cannot narrow it down. Got it - Organised Jews means what Jack thinks it means.

 

Yes of course, why didn't I see it before the world jewish congress is the place where the evil jews hatch their diabolical plots for world domination.

Or are they simply a global lobbying organization that champions jewish causes and solidarity.

 

Lowest form of wit, they say.

And I don't have to deal with anything, Liebe.

Discuss the topics in a civil manner, or I will merely ignore you, it's that simple.

Thanks

 

You haven't.

What I said was that I was bored by you going on about something and nothing, and was going to make coffee.

 

Jack, Goldman Sachs is a publically traded company and isn't controlled by jews.
here's their largest shareholders, feel free to identify any jewish controlled investors.

http://investors.morningstar.com/ownership/shareholders-major.html?t=GS

Adelson was on the scene long before Romney. The republican stance on tax cuts has been loudly and clearly articulated for the last couple of dozen years. Before romney adelson backed newt gingrich. Romney didn't have to do anything for adelson because what adelson wanted was what the party stood for, hence adelson supporting them with all that pocket change.

Looks like you know squat about american politics too.

 

I don't subscribe to the Zionist conspiracy myself, but their CEO is a Jew,lol. And just looking at names doesn't cut it. Folks change their names every day so as to not be so easily identifiable in certain demographics..

 

that's the Congressional pay amendment. just saying...

 

the same goes for you. you don't like what FB does, don't use it.

 

Againststein? is that you?

 

My use of it, is nothing to do with the thread.

 

Mostly Jews, that wanted to pass themselves off as gentiles.

 

I have seen that often. But in my experience it's mostly foreigners with unusual or hard to pronounce names who want to make it easier or fit in better.

 

wonder why? could it be a few centuries of discrimination? or is it all part of the plot?

 

Why have Jews been kicked out of so many countries?

I don't know why I'm asking this, I know the truth...it's because the world is saturated with racist fascists. But I wanted your take on it.

 

Different motives then. To do it for that reason, may be simple ease for all.

But the reason most Jews do it, is far more sly, they wish to literally pass themselves off as non Jews, and the first give away, is usually the name, right?

Well, sometimes, but because of Jews doing this, over and over, they can now walk around with what appear to be strictly non Jew names.

It probably means there is even greater Jewish subversion, into yet more tiers, than we initially thought, if they pass themselves off as gentiles.

They even go as far as to change some of their racial features, to create, artifically, a more European shaped nose, for example.

Fast times at Nose Job High

Every Jewish woman faces a serious dilemma at some point in her life: Nose job, or used car?

http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/fast-times-at-nose-job-high-1.433860

So.

They change their names.

And how they look.

And pretend not to be Jews.

Not looking very trustworthy or even stable, are they, lol?

 

Well, the Kosher approved version, is that on 109 occasions, much like me, the entire population of each country, 109 times, woke up one morning, and thought 'You know what we need to do? We need to start hating on Jews, for no reason, at all'.

It was always our fault, and never ever the fault or error of Jews, therefore, there is nothing for Jews to learn from, while we, we must always learn, from how evil we are meant to have been, over, and over, and over, and over.

That is the Kosher version.

The reality is, that if you get thrown out 109 times, in all other circumstances, there would come a stage at which you think it must be particualr behaviours, that create this antipathy, that keeps reaching this sort of critical mass, time and again.

That would be the fair and correct thing to do, because then you may have some chance of change, and, therefore, you do not replicate the same reactions, or a variant of, in the future.

But for as long as Jews play the pity narrative, the eternal Jewish victim, while always making non Jews out to be merely hateful, Jews will never collectively change their ways, therefore, they go on repeating the same kinds of behaviours, which in turn, again, eventually make the rest of the people dislike them.

Maybe, for some twisted reason, they have a psychological need to feel pitied all the time, and be the victim, all the time, and blame everyone else, ever for their wrongdoing, all the time? Maybe they even have some sort of weird need to be hated, so that even when there is no hate, they have to create their own?

[video=youtube;iwTi37mvBB0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwTi37mvBB0[/video]

 

Crazy people, here's another one, I told ya, it fills some sort of psychological need, in some way!

[video=youtube;hWW27uwfH_E]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWW27uwfH_E[/video]

 

tag team.
not a great set up. a tad to transparent.


As soon as you can find a single instance of jews being evicted where they didn't have to give up all their property and most of their cash, then let me know. Facts, not bullshyte nonsense.

Maybe jew haters have a psychological need to hate jews because their mothers dropped them on their heads when they were little. Maybe they have this weird hate that they are compelled to perpetuate in order to feel good about themselves. (Nobody that is full of hate can imagine what self love is or what it does to one's quality of life.).

Facts jack, prove that your hatred is justified.


WHERE IS THE PROTOCOL POST YOU PROMISED?

 

Jonsa.

All you have done tonight, is filled every other post, with a personal tirade of abuse.

I don't care for it, or you manner.

On that basis, I am going to disengage in discourse with you, until such a time that you are able to discuss topics, without it getting to that.

I cannot be ersed to be honest.

Someone else may, but I find it boring.

Sorry etc