Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

FBI claims 95% of 93 buried

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Sep 5, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Page 5 of 5
  1. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Personal attacks are a violation of ToS.
     
    Hannibal, Oct 15, 2011
    #101
  2. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38

    I see you never bothered cleaning up that blatant lie in your thread title truthseeker.

    Innocent mistake I'm sure.
     
    NAB, Oct 15, 2011
    #102
  3. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Because...YOU say it is.

    I'd rather see the proof...oh, that's right...there ISN'T ANY.
     
    RtWngaFraud, Oct 16, 2011
    #103
  4. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If it isn't, I'd like to register some complaints myself.
     
    RtWngaFraud, Oct 16, 2011
    #104
  5. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0



    Instead of taking all that time to defend an "official" supporter, why not take that time and post some actual proof regarding the OP?
     
    RtWngaFraud, Oct 16, 2011
    #105
  6. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Suede said the thread title was a mistake. Are you saying there isn't any proof for your claim?
     
    Hannibal, Oct 16, 2011
    #106
  7. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    suede asked me a direct question. I was answering that question.

    Show some proof that the FBI claimed that 95% of 93 was buried and we can discuss that.
     
    DDave, Oct 16, 2011
    #107
  8. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You'd simply avoid it. But see, if you can look that far, you could (would and do) see the problem with any percentage being "buried". Again, you ignore it.
     
    RtWngaFraud, Oct 16, 2011
    #108
  9. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    If you have proof, why would suede say your thread title was a mistake?
     
    DDave, Oct 16, 2011
    #109
  10. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The percentage of the supposed burial varies from 95% on down. But you knew that already, didn't ya?
     
    RtWngaFraud, Oct 16, 2011
    #110
  11. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Show any proof that the title of your thread is factual.
     
    Hannibal, Oct 16, 2011
    #111
  12. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    There isn't any proof that your thread title has any truth in it.

    You know it's a lie, yet you won't back down an inch to admit it. Insecure much?
     
    NAB, Oct 16, 2011
    #112
  13. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Actually, I didn't.
     
    DDave, Oct 16, 2011
    #113
  14. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Show ANY proof the 93 was ever buried, in ANY percentage.
     
    RtWngaFraud, Oct 17, 2011
    #114
  15. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The title of this thread is a lie. You have no evidence to back it up.

    Even your buddy suede noticed.
     
    Hannibal, Oct 17, 2011
    #115
  16. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So what percentage of Flight 93 would YOU conclude, based on the available proof :fart: was buried?
     
    RtWngaFraud, Oct 17, 2011
    #116
  17. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Show any proof that the title of your thread is factual.
     
    Hannibal, Oct 17, 2011
    #117
  18. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Zero proof 93 was buried using ANY percentage.....got it.
     
    RtWngaFraud, Oct 18, 2011
    #118
  19. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you admit that you lied in your thread title ... Got it.
     
    Hannibal, Oct 18, 2011
    #119
  20. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    calling someone a liar without proving it is a lie?

    Just claiming its not true is NOT enough to call anything a lie.

    The burden of proof that it is a lie is on you pal, good luck with that btw LOL
     
    Kokomojojo, Oct 18, 2011
    #120
  21. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The OP has not shown any evidence that the title of the thread has veracity.

    Even his fellow 'truthers' admit that the title is an 'innocent mistake'.
     
    Hannibal, Oct 18, 2011
    #121
  22. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113

    and that proves lie? NOT

    Maybe in your mind it does but it ends there.

    LMAO
     
    Kokomojojo, Oct 18, 2011
    #122
  23. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    When one is shown the evidence that his title is a 'mistake' and refuses to alter or admit it; yes, that's a lie.
     
    Hannibal, Oct 18, 2011
    #123
  24. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I didnt see any evidence to that effect
     
    Kokomojojo, Oct 18, 2011
    #124
  25. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh, well. Perhaps suede can point it out to you.
     
    Hannibal, Oct 18, 2011
    #125
Page 5 of 5

Share This Page