And yet you are against taking a woman's right to receive an abortion, which was done Constitutionally through the Supreme Court and was done Constitutionally through the Supreme Court to take it away. So, not disengenious of it all. The point is that no right, not even in the Constutution enumerated in the Bill or Rights or in the other amendments, is unlimited, not even the 2a. And not even the Founding Fathers would agree with your argument. that the 2a guarantees the right of ownership of firearms without limits or restrictions. Even the Great Supreme Court Anthony Scalia would disagree with you on this one if he were alive.
Psychiatrists, Psychologists, medicine they are taking, actions that are not the norm from the past, and so forth. In most cases, this is a TRO type of situation when it comes to red flag laws. If you don't show up, then you can't defend the accusations and a summary judgment is entered. You know, these little details that the far right media intentionally ignores because it does not fit their myopic view of the world.
Account bearing Ohio FBI standoff suspect's name encouraged violence against the agency in posts on Trump social media platform https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/11/us/ricky-shiffer-purported-social-media-posts/index.html
I don't think the GOP will take the Senate. Dr. Oz is fading in Pennsylvania. Walker is also fading in Georgia with his horrible campaign, Ron Johnson may lose in Wiscounsin. Marco Rubio is questionable in Florida, especially after his fiasco at bipartisanship. GOP will win Arizona with Mark Kelly and possibly New Hampshire with a moderate Republican. So, it is probably not going to look good at the senate level. House, the GOP will win that, but not by much, maybe by 6 or 8 votes, which puts the Freedom Caucus in the driver's seat. And that is bad for the GOP in the long run IMO.
Legally, even as Governor, he can't, if he beats Abbott this time. Remember, even a felon can legally obtain a firearm in Texas, thanls to the NRA and the GOP. Red flag laws, increased background checks, ban on gun stocks, which Trump did by EO, and other reasonable measures are not taking your guns in the law. If you need to stop the self-induced paranoia you have, I know a number of qualified, certified psychologists who would just love for you and them to sit down and talk this out.
No it's people who want to drive a partisan wedge and think that that's the most important thing you can do with your life. I get that you hate my stinking guts but I'm not going to play with you.
That is one of the dumbest sentences I ever read on this site. I don't live anywhere near hate...WTF??!! I'd suggest that you might want to stop making/seeing yourself as a victim and accept that the Right is radicalizing their most vulnerable party members. You can't dispute my post you quoted because it's the truth.
Methinks you protest too much. I'm not seeing myself as a victim that would imply that your opinions hold any value with me. I am seeing your ultra partisanship and I don't think that's healthy.
Me thinks you,re desperate for a straw man deflection since you can't dispute what I posted. Tough, for you even worse disingenuous post by you since you quoted me and came up empty.
I don't need the dispute it I don't even disagree with it. It's just not so incredibly important to me to point out partisanship. I'm just pointing out how delighted you are at being able to blame Trump supporters for something I think you're reading too much into this.
Trying to pivot away from the nonsense you were claiming as a victim of hate? That's disingenuous even juvenile sandbox mentality level thinking. Here 's what you are unable to tolerate much less dispute since ALL facts are on my side of the statement below: RW violent rhetoric leads to RW radicalization and people doing stupid things for even more stupid reasons. All for the RW politicians to fund raise off of.
Stuck on that strawman huh? Say whatever you want about me this isn't personal to me. Are you suggesting this is exclusive to the right one that the left wings is here is the driven snow or righteous?
^^ All fact destroying the pure lack of factual credibility of your post Dumbest sentence in bold I've read and likely post projection. making my point again after the sandbox whining victim post of yours.... The straw man fail Adding clarity to the strawman flail your post was grasping for. You quoted me so I guess the truth hit the mark Personal is where your posts went when you could not debate or dispute my accurate post. There is no equating both sides when it comes to pure political violence and the ones calling and wishing for it.
Claims aren't facts or factual just because you insist on them. opinions are like the exit of the human digestive system in two ways. meaningless word salad. you don't seem to read. I'm not in dispute with you about what you said it's why you said it.
When you reduce your posts to a deflection comfort zone, it's obvious you are well aware that this dead guy was triggered to violence by the RW rhetoric attacking the FBI who are doing their jobs. Reducing your own posts to what you'r accusing me off is rich in irony and gas lighting since you can't counter this and how it applies accurately to this thread: RW violent rhetoric leads to RW radicalization and people doing stupid things for even more stupid reasons. All for the RW politicians to fund raise off of. He's was a Trumper on Truth Social calling for violence to the FBI and at the Capitol Jan 6th.
There is nothing to deflect. Again for the fourth time now. I don't disagree with you I just find you repulsive.
Lol.. Suddenly, the left see violence against law enforcement as urgent matter after defunding the police across the nation.
Hahaha. Then don't quote me with a nonsense response, shouldn't be easy for you but give it a try since you can't debunk my factual statement that hit the jackpot of discomfort.