Flight 93 recovered underground?

The contact info of the people on the scene has been posted numerous times. Ask them if they found two engines. Go directly to the source.

Anybody find proof that the official position is that most of Flight 93 was recovered underground? No? OK.

The OP remains a straw man argument.

 

I listen to all sides of the argument. Those easily dismissed are, well, easily dismissed.

You say so.

Read the quote. I gave you the link.

Gee, how did you cram so much BS into 2 sentences? Found, not there, hidden, buried,....whatever location adverb you want to throw in next...go ahead and get it over with Some men are able to simply come out and make a concise statement.

Some of it was buried. Some not. Some in the forest near by, some further away.

Eminem

Charlie Sheen

Take your pick of the ones on this board.

Not sure what you're meaning by answering a question with a question (a sign that you've had your ass handed to you on a silver platter by the way) but if you're going to bury an engine to make it look like a plane crash, all of the logic in the world states that you'd bury the engines right next to one another or certainly closer than they were found...

as was evidenced by submission in a US Federal District Court as well as stated by a Major in the Pennsylvania State Police.

Now perhaps you can list your credentials and we can compare your expertise to the US Attorney and the supervising lawman.

he he he.

 

Deleted by the author.

 

(Couldn't resist! )

 

Sounds like he's just forwarding what he was told. So much for him as evidence.

Only some, not most? I wish the official story would stay consistent.

How did any of that go to prove most was underground?!?

LOL, so two people (both celebrities, mind you) out of the thousands of truthers out there and you make it sound like the movement is riddled with unsavory people. You really should get help for you obsession with the TM.

The only liar I've come across on this board is Hannibal.

Who said I think any engine was buried?

You should seriously consider stand-up comedy.

Wow, submitting something to a US Fed court. How can I compete with that? And that cop is worthless as evidence for being "they told me" evidence.

 

I guess it's asking too much for you to include yourself on that list.

 

Of course not. The obsession shows.

Anybody find proof that the official position is that most of Flight 93 was recovered underground? No? OK.

 

. . . . .

 

So that would be "no", then.

The OP remains a straw man argument.

 

Hannibal: "The people on the scene confirmed for me that the plane was mostly buried."
"I believe the people on the scene, and they say the majority of UA93 was buried at the scene of the crash."

 

That remains my position. It hasn't changed.

The OP isn't about me.

Any proof that the official position is that most of Flight 93 was recovered underground? No? OK.

 

So you say.

The Commission Report (the one you can't quote a major inaccuracy from) doesn't mention it being buried at all.

Not sure what you mean but I'm sure it doesn't matter.

Thousands? Now that is funny.

Is Korey out of jail yet? LOL.

No mirrors in your house?

HFD is a liar.
Rightwing fraud is a habitual liar
You, sir, are a liar.

See above.

You could be my mentor; you're extremely hilarious.

It was entered into evidence in a felony trial; accepted by the defense and approved by the judge. Yes HOW can you compete with that? We both know you can't.

You should put me back on ignore (remember when you said you had me on ignore...gee another lie); you're getting your ass handed to you.

 

They are trying like hell to derail the question about the 2nd engine allegedly found near the crash site

None of them have provided any proof that the 2nd engine was found near the crash site or if a 2nd engine was even found.

Keep asking until they answer the question.

 

Would you like to call him and the other searchers liars?

 

Nah, he's had it.

 

He was the only one stating an engine had been found some distance from the crash site.

You won't get the facts from him.

 

So you are saying he's a liar. Got any evidence?

 

So he says:

Szupinka said searchers found one of the large engines from the aircraft “at a considerable distance from the crash site.”
“It appears to be the whole engine,” he added.
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_12969.html

I'd have to read it before I could attempt.

Well at least the CR is accurate about that point; no plane was buried at all there!!!

I asked for evidence that most of the 757 was in the ground (evidence none of you skeptics have even come close to produce) and you included mentioning about debris "found" in places other than in the ground. Not sure how that goes to prove debris was underground???

Yeah, it's probably closer to a million. Not all who think it was an inside job protest on the streets.

How long did he get sentenced for?

I'm sure you think every truther is a liar, but what about 9/11 have I lied about?

So? What does that prove?

Here's me announcing I took every remaining skeptic off ignore:

And here's YOU commenting about that in the very next post of the thread:

So stop lying that I lied.

Now that's funny.

If you really want to hand my ass to me, show me irrefutable proof that most of the 757 was buried (as Hannibal believes it was).

 

I don't know about lying, but Popular Mechanics is calling them wrong:

So skeptics, how did it go from a "whole engine" found in the woods to a "fan from one of the engines" found in the pond?

It would be nice if the official story would remain consistent.

 

See, this is part of the game you "official" supporters play, and it also shows how ridiculously incomplete the "official" BS story actually is and the information it lacks (rather which information is concealed). No meat to the "official" proclamations or specifics. All carefully removed ahead of time by one Phillip Zelikow, under orders from the criminal administration in office at the time.

 

While I'm no expert on jet engines, the fan portion appears to be largest and most recognizable portion of the engine. It appears the term "majority" is the hair which you continually choose to split.

 

While they're busy getting together the official percentage number , I'd also like someone to provide proof there was no plane at all found in Shanksville.

Since some people are fixated on "percentage" numbers, how about comparing the percentage of evidence that UA 93 crashed there vs. the percentage of evidence that it didn't.

 

Hey everybody, it's time to play MOVE THE GOALPOST:

 

It appears you can't read well because I never used the term "majority."

 

Naturally you find those two statements to differ, and naturally your obsession with me has led you to dodge the question yet again.

Anybody find proof that the official position is that most of Flight 93 was recovered underground? No? OK.

The OP remains a straw man argument.