FOX Liars (Part One)

Well I don't think Fox comes even close to the lies and doctored tapes that MSNBC puts out. If you haven't seen most of them I suggest you go back and read previous posts I put up. MSNBC is the biggest race bating, lying station on the air. People need to clean up their own house before throwing stones at others. What ever you guys found that Fox did wrong, it's been more than countered by MSNBC's doctored tapes to make everyone look like racist. I love how the creator of this thread puts down (Part One) Let him bring it on, I have no doubt it will all be countered by something MSNBC did that is much worse.

 

I'll tell you what. We've already got a good collection started on this thread already. Why don't you post as much or more on here of MSNBC lying as what we have already posted of Fox. I hear you talking about it, but you haven't posted any confirmed lies. Show us the proof of the doctored tapes that makes everyone look like a racist, that is coming from MSNBC. I'd bet anything, what you have posted in the past are not doctored tapes and lies at all. MSNBC is guilty that I know of, of giving out the wrong information occasionally, only to fall back later and make those corrections publicly. And I watch a lot of MSNBC and google search their claims to corroborate what they say. I won't let them off the hook either.

 

.....because FOX News would never show doctored tapes.
[video=youtube;vhZ9jE7Ztt4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhZ9jE7Ztt4[/video]

 

Funny your video got cut off before telling us what we didn't see.

I see nowhere where it shows that Fox News made that video, or doctored them, It only shows that a group of people brought one or more videos showing ACORN doing things illegal and played it. Instead of homing in on what they wore, why is what ACORN did passed over?

 

I sort of remember that and it wasn't just one ACORN office they went into and they didn't wear the same outfits to all of them. They wanted to see if they got a different reaction from ACORN if they were dressed differently. By the way, I loved the outfit the girl is shown wearing.

 

I think I have already knocked down several of your videos, including the last one you tried to pin on Fox for altering.

I have posted those videos, or the story to those videos, or audios that MSNBC altered. All you have to do is go back and look at them/

 

Funny I have been able to question or put down several videos that you guys put up. I have yet had anyone question or prove any of the videos or stuff I put up as wrong.

 

What was it that little dip**** got arrested for? I believe the former pimp was arrested for burglary or something.

 

There was one I remember with two Black ACORN employees talking to this couple telling them the best way of bringing those girls into the country.

Again, show that the video lied about ACORN. They didn't. I also remembering them saying they went to several ACORN offices and I'm sure I remember them saying they didn't dress as pimps in all of them. There is no proof that Fox altered any of those videos. Fox even said they were done by others.

Now how come I never got one reaction to those altered videos that MSNBC put out? There is no doubt that MSNBC altered them, along with the audio that they doctored of Zimmerman. They are being sued over that one.

 

There was no lie by Maddow. What happened was, is that she misinterpreted the wording of the bill. Any fool can see what happened here. I've been watching Maddow since her show began. To my knowledge, she has never willfully told anything that was untrue. And I have checked behind her. This is just an example of her misreading the bill and wrongfully reporting what she thought she had interpreted.

And, she knows better than to reach out to those folks who are accusing her. Because, she knows they know what really happened and she's not going to give them the satisfaction.

 

Your video would not come up. What does that tell you?

 

You have yet to refute the premise of this thread.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/25/fox-news-video-omits-appl_n_588447.html

 

They do it on a regular basis.
[video=youtube;WcpbFWeLPcY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcpbFWeLPcY[/video]

 

I can agree with you on this one. They didn't mention first time voters.

 

I'm not even trying to say MSNBC is better or somehow more right in what they do. But I think it would be hard to argue that the success of FOX News doesn't set the pace for their competition.

 

I will agree with that one too.

 

I appreciate your civil tone.
Semper Fidelis (as much as you'll ever hear me say on that subject)

 

Well I'm glad to hear you say that MSNBC doesn't do it or is better at telling the truth than Fox because it sure wouldn't be true. I do think MSNBC plays up the race card a lot. They made Zimmerman look racist, made Governor Perry look racist, Lied about the guy carrying a gun and rifle. Making him out to be a White racist when he was Black. They lied about Rush Limbaugh making a racial statement. They cut every minority speech at the Republican National Convention from their coverage. I think something like that is a hell of a lot worse than cutting a applause, or not saying new voters. Some things are minor and some are major. I see a lot of major editing with MSNBC and most of it is racial.

 

MSNBC Edits Tape of Sandy Hook Testimony to Manipulate the Public

30 January 2013 / 10 Comments

msnbc-copy-300x210

The mainstream media seems to think their job is to publish state-sponsored propaganda instead of facts. The latest example comes from MSNBC.

I am not sure that MSNBC qualifies as mainstream media but they think they are so I will go with it for now.

MSNBC posted an edited tape of Neil Heslin, father of murdered Sandy Hook child Jesse Lewis, as he provided testimony about gun control. The article which included the tape was entitled, Emotional father of Sandy Hook victim heckled by gun nuts.

The only problem with the article is that it was meant to enrage people against gun rights advocates by leaving out one important segment in the tape which included a question by Mr. Heslin. Mr. Heslin asked, seemingly of the audience, why anyone would need an assault-type weapon or large-capacity magazines.

Aside from the content, the question is important because the alleged “heckling” was actually not heckling but rather a response to this question. MSNBC made it appear as if Mr. Heslin was interrupted and heckled by “gun nuts” out of the blue.

The anti-gun nuts have an agenda and they don’t mind using victims’ families to push it FORWARD.

In the unedited tape, you will see that Mr. Heslin asked a question, hesitated, and then gave the impression that silence meant no one had an answer, which prompted one person to say “second amendment” and another to say “shall not be infringed.” There are reports that other gun rights advocates in the audience spoke out. It is impossible to know the truth without having been there.

To View Footage: http://www.independentsentinel.com/

Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2013/01/ms...to-manipulate-the-public/#Eptlrpv3LuIpGwCo.99

 

MSNBC aired footage today that inaccurately portrayed Mitt Romney’s remarks at a campaign stop in Pennsylvania.
Discussing how the public sector suffers from a lack of competition, Romney told the audience about an optometrist who wanted to change his address and subsequently received 33 pages of paperwork from the federal government, which begat a months-long bureaucratic nightmare during which the optometrist in question wasn’t receiving his checks. “That’s how government works,” Romney said.

Then, to illustrate the advantages of competition in the private sector, Romney shared an anecdote from his visit to the local WaWa chain store. “I was at WaWas, I went in to order a sandwich. You press a little touchtone keypad — you touch this, touch this, go pay the cashier — there’s your sandwich. It’s amazing. People in the private sector have learned how to compete. It’s time to bring some competition to the federal government.”

But in the MSNBC clip, which first aired on Andrea Mitchell Reports, Romney’s remarks begin with the WaWa anecdote and end at “It’s amazing,” an edit — first noted by conservative blogger Sooper Mexican — that makes it seem as though Romney was expressing amazement at the advent of touchtone screens.

http://weaselzippers.us/2012/06/18/...ting-tape-to-make-romney-appear-out-of-touch/

 

This is the audio tape that MSNBC edited out. You hear both his words and the edited part. Page down to the bottom 6 videos and look at the one that looks like a cartoon. It's the top right one.


http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...nbc edits tapes&type=1button&fr=uh3_my_web_gs

 

MSNBC ‘Forced’ To Apologize Over Selectively Editing Joe Biden Speech [Video]



MSNBC’s habit of selectively editing video clips has gotten them into trouble yet again, forcing the network to apologize to its viewers for taking quotes from Vice President Joe Biden out of context.


Biden was giving a speech dedicated to the Americans who died in the Benghazi consulate attack last year, but the network used a clip of the speech to frame a discussion about gun control in the United States.




“No child should predecease their parents and no one should have to suffer the loss of their spouse, it’s not easy,” Biden said in the edited clip.

During his speech at the State Department, Biden actually said this: “No child should predecease their parents. I wish I could tell you we aren’t going to add any more names with this wall. I wish I could say that with certainty, but the truth of the matter is, there will be more. There will be more.”

After the edited clip played, MSNBC’s Thomas Roberts said that Biden was referring to “children as the victims of gun violence” in the speech.

National Review, a conservative publication, pointed out that the clip was edited to give an ambiguous impression of Biden’s speech, and that the gun control discussion that followed was misleading to viewers.

Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/647643/msn...g-joe-biden-speech-video/#LzEu68AVchrJIzhU.99

 

MSNBC's Rachel Maddow admits playing edited tape to smear McCain

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeffre...gleefully-admits-using-edited-video-smear-gop

 

MSNBC Editing tapes again - Ryan chant


Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney leading what looks like a failed “Romney-Ryan” chant at a campaign stop in Ohio on Tuesday, prompting an embarrassed Joe Scarborough to mutter “Oh, sweet Jesus” and a purse-lipped Mika Brzezinski to ask “What’s wrong with those people?”
You can see our coverage of Scarborough’s outburst here, but we’ve included the clip as a refresher:

{GO TO LINK TO SEE VIDEO}



One day later, while continuing the conversation on how Rep. Paul Ryan overshadows the former Massachusetts governor, MSNBC host Martin Bashir played thesame clip (minus the graphic). Although the clip Bashir aired differs slightly from the one aired during “Morning Joe,” the message was the same.
But now things are getting interesting.

if you listen closely, it’s obvious the audio in the clip has been adjusted. However, that’s not uncommon — and that doesn‘t necessarily mean it’s MSNBC who did it. Sound technicians usually cut out the audience to ensure speakers aren’t drowned out (which you can do by simply turning the mics up and down — or you can do after the fact). However, where the controversy comes in is in the caption on the screen quoting the audience as chanting “Ryan!” Why is that controversial? Because people who attended the event say that’s not what happened, and that the MSNBC video grossly misrepresents what actually occurred.

.....
Lots of backup from other media that report differently from MSNBC
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/anot...f-rally-chant/

Obviously they are hearing what they want to hear


Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?218228-MSNBC-Editing-tapes-again-Ryan-chant

 

Slow news day at Fox...