Fox News' honest mistake about Ron Paul

Just can't have it both ways. Either a politician wants the exposure, or they don't. There's usually good reason why they turn it down... but it's a little disingenuous to turn down an interview, then complain about not getting enough attention.

 

I was thinking about an old Hippie...But okay...

 

You are right, the media did ignore and dismissed Ron Paul and after he complained about it, THEN Bill invited him on. I would encourage Ron to go on the show and discuss what he believes versus having someone else that is not his fan tell everyone what they believe Ron believes. It was kind of dishonest the way the guest was talking about Rons stance on issues while not presenting all the facts.

 

BRAVO RON PAUL!!

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIVnwYGU9Qo"]Bill O'Reilly at his best - YouTube[/ame]

 

Ron Paul is a frustrated liberal aka Democrat just like Ronald Reagan was.

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7JPvbVsDdY"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7JPvbVsDdY[/ame]

Constant interrupts when asked questions and also refusal to let those watching understand the History behind the Questions being asked... Bill of course was short on time but, he was a major ass in this discussion.

 

Ron Paul 1. baba oreilly 0
baba oreillys mike is lowder and hes pointing a lot more fingers, and more aggressive but in my book he still gets a round zero. avoiding every Ron Paul point as "we don't have time for that"

 

Ron Paul needs to sound more like Bill O'Reilly. Then I might respect him more as an authority figure.

 

With that I completely agree! did you just read my web site? because that's exactly what I wrote there:

 

I actually did not. Someone finally agrees with my opinions on Ron Paul! ^_^

 

He is the most fiscal conservative running. He only has "liberal" (in the sense government shouldn't hold people back) social views. He is the conservative in the truest sense, not a progressive like so many Democrats and some Republicans.

 

Ever heard of "speak softly and carry a big stick"?

 

Ron Paul doesn't speak softly. He speaks like he's been abducted.

 

EXACTLY

Yes. But I still don't like the fact that some cockroach like Bill Oreilly can shout and keep stabbing his fingers at an Older Ron Paul who clearly is making much more sense. for me just watching this infuriates me, not to mention what a lowlife oreily and the whole fox news scumbag organization is: these people destroyed him in 2008, theres good compilation videos on this, why does Ron Paul give these scumbags credebility by appearing on that television - it is the exact same if I would go play cards with the cheaters or go argue with the retards and then those retards (fox news are not retards but professional propaganda machine for special interests) have legitimacy because they support a good independent candidate. Ron Paul should stay out of the television and do exactly what is described on my web site. you know who still watches television? people who can be brainwashed too easily, old people who should not even have voting rights because they are too brainwashed by the media. if someone like Ron Paul would stand up and denounce the media and not participate, then maybe people would wake up more. besides, Ron Paul needs to have senators and congressmen on his side if he is to make any changes as president, as my web site again explains.

 

AMEN. that's the answer I was looking for, honest to god