Further proof that the Land of Palestine is Jewish

Actually, you are promoting anarchy by dictating that those in possession should be overthrown. In case you missed it Israel occupies land won in a war. Again, if you think that is wrong, are you willing to give up where you live for the previous owners?

 

Nope...I'll try it once more. Israel ILLEGALLY OCCUPIES Palestinian land. They are obliged, by law, to withdraw and return this land to its rightful owners, There's nothing anarchistic about that. On the contrary, by definition, it is YOU that believes in the anarchistic Hobbesian law of the jungle.

 

You also illegally occupy someone else's land, especially if you are European or American. Are you willing to give up where you live.

 

Absolutely not. According to binding UNSC 242 land for peace resolution they are supposed to withdraw to negotiated borders in exchange for peace, mutual recognition and the end of the state of intransigence. Israel accepted the resolution, the Arab world's response to it was 'No peace, no recognition, no negotiations with Israel'. As the resolution was binding the Arab world blatantly broke international law.

 

You ain't getting this sonny. The logic is simple. Re-read the thread, and maybe it'll sink in. I can't help your inability to be able to comprehend information.

 

There's a thread devoted to the law. You were thrashed good and proper. Bye bye.

 

Right. What you are saying is that your requirements are different for Jews that for you. Got it.

 

No I'm not saying that. Your fantasy sonny, not mine.

 

What you are saying is that you don't occupy someone else's land. Prove it.

 

There is legally binding UN 242 resolution that has never been revoked or modified and it clearly defines the parameters to resolve the conflict. Thy don't call it "land for peace" resolution for nothing. Just in case I have not made myself perfectly clear, it's land for peace dear, not land for terror.

 

You still ain't getting it. The argument is simple. Try re-reading the thread again. Alternatively, take your time machine and go back in time to the days prior to the establishment of international law and compare then with now.

Getting it yet?

 

Like I say, Moon thrashed you and you embarrassed yourself...Don't do it again.

 

Are you talking about International law that arab/muslim countries have been violating on a daily basis for the last 70 years? Why are you talking about it? Being their apologist you should keep a very very low profile on the issue of international law.

 

Your deflection, refusal to respond, inability to respond is noted.

 

Granny says the Bible says God says Jerusalem belongs to the Jews...

Fate Of Jerusalem Key to Mideast Peace
March 09, 2012 - The flurry of diplomacy and talk of war in recent weeks by the United States, Iran and Israel has overshadowed what has been a central issue in the Middle East for more than four decades - the search for peace between Israelis and Palestinians.

 

Why is Israel proper pre-67?

International law seems to be completely impotent in this and virtually every other instance it has been referenced.

My jibes aren't cheap, its just that you make it too easy.

Paranoic prattle? sure.

I have NEVER referenced any biblical text as justification for any land claim ever. In fact, quite the opposite, but I can see how your reading comprehension can suffer when you are so emotionally invested and completely entrenched.

One day you may, just may, be able to see life in its true shades of gray.

 

Moon completely failed in that debate, at the end of it he was not even arguing with me but with the International Committed of the Red Cross which views contradicted his claims.

Regardless, other than hiding behind Moon's skirt, do you actually disagree that a binding UNSC resolution mandates "land for peace" approach to the conflict which totally destroys your baseless claim that Israel should withdraw unilaterally and unconditionally?

 

There are no shades of grey in relation to issues of right and wrong/ morality and immorality. Your tendency to be reluctant to distance yourself from the actions of fascists by not calling a 'spade a spade' puts you solidly in the appeasment camp.

The pre-67 borders is Israel but the nature of fascism is such that it is premised on the illegal capture of more and more territory. I call fascism for what it is.

International law maybe impotent but that doesn't mean that its tenets are wrong. I think it's important that states obey international law, apparently you are indifferent to this with respect to Israel...Why?

 

Try making sense, and I might respond.

 

But he's right, he has the archaeological proof that some Romans were there before you, so obviously you must vacate your home for the Toga-heads.

 

The UN states categorically that the acquisition of land through war is illegal. Israel signed up to the UN Charter and, as such, is bound by its laws. Israel is currently in breach of both UN and International laws.

 

I get a kick out of the way it is framed.

Israel is in breach of international law by responding to rocket attacks.

 

If Israel didn't indulge in stealing Palestinian land on a daily basis then the Palestinians would have no reason to resist. Israel has been doing this since the inception of the state.

 

Simply because nothing has been stolen!

Open a Bible Old or New testament you will get a true illustation

A Land is recognized by its History, Archeology its Religion its Language!!!!!!
The only artifacts left in my country is the droppings of their Camels and sheep.

 

Just a heads up, OP. There's a typo in the title. You meant to say "Further proof that the Land of Palestine WAS Jewish".