Gay Community may play role in assisting humans to live to a hundred and be healthy!

It's not really that I have "extreme confidence" in evidence-based medicine. Give me a new cure, regardless of who's pushing it, and I expect good evidence that it works. This is a basic, guiding, golden rule I use in such endeavors. And glyconutrients do not have reliable evidence behind them. Meanwhile, vaccines have the entire weight of the scientific research backing them. Not a single paper other than Wakefield's fraudulent article has established negative effects of vaccinations, and the only "evidence" claiming that it's harmful is quacks screeching about how "there's mercury in it" and pointing to a demonstrably false correlation between autism and vaccines while forgetting that mercury in such low concentrations and in its composition therein is about as dangerous as swallowing a few atoms of cyanide.

I guess you could say I have extreme confidence in the scientific method; and it is quite telling that those peddling "alternative medicine" have to assert some kind of bias in the process - it means that they cannot back up their product with real evidence. Asserting a major failure on the part of the scientific method within medicine would require a gigantic international conspiracy, and seeing as they're also not exactly hasty to provide evidence of that, I think it's fair to laugh them off. When a doctor is willing to put his reputation on the line by speaking out against what may be the single most beneficial piece of medical research in the history of humankind, and cannot provide any evidence beyond screeching about how vaccines are made out of diseased cells (given his status, you'd think he'd understand how a vaccine works - he's (*)(*)(*)(*)ing lying) and obnoxious compounds, then his reputation is forfeit. At that point, I don't care what he has to say about anything else.

It's telling that most of the people furthering this "amazing miracle cure" pretty much reject all science-based medicine. I'm not opposed to the idea of glyconutrients, but if there's no evidence for something, there's just no evidence for that something, and it doesn't matter how many doctors you can find to stand by it. If those Doctors can't provide evidence, I just don't care.

 

<3
10chars

 

So arrogant. You're just pawns of the left, another minority for them to exploit. You are part of the degradation of Western culture.

 

Sounds like someone needs to take a chill pill.

 

Actually, both you and I might be surprised if we dug deeply into how much research has been done on these glyconutrients!

http://www.glyconutrientsreference.com/whatareglyconutrients/historyofglyconutrients.php

 

The thought has crossed my mind that documentary, reality and even semi-reality film projects could well play a huge role in helping humanity to embrace a new way of thinking that leads to genuine peace on earth!!!!

In a sense.....maybe our soul/human spirit....angel....volunteered to become human much as people volunteer to become contestants and participants in reality film events!!!!!


http://dwij.org/forum/future_link/future7.htm

 

Back in 1988, I would say that I may have been something of an ignorant pawn of the political right....and I truly am thankful that I had to confront what I now am pretty sure were serious and massive flaws in my own thinking from that time in my life?????!!!!

i guess it is possible that when I die and review my life with the being of light Word/Logos Guy of NDE fame......perhaps I will be told that I went down hill since 1988..........but I am pretty sure that is not what the being of light and I will conclude?????!!!

 

So ironbmike......what do you personally think of the Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski movie?

Have you seen it yet?

Do you personally think I am naive to believe that something of a revolution is occurring in the use of food as a preventative medicine....as well as in medicine itself???!!


https://www.facebook.com/pages/Burzynski-The-Movie/318281183441?fref=ts
Burzynski, The Movie
19,760 likes · 338 talking about this

 

I posted a discussion over on another forum here and got back a truly brilliant reply.......that I actually hope is closer to the truth than my own opinion at this time.......This topic is critical to The Gay Community or any other group of people being able to transform the world economy!

.....
http://www.politicalforum.com/jfk/3...oln-policy-had-saved-taxpayers-4-billion.html

JFK was attempting to duplicate Lincoln policy that had saved taxpayers $4 billion



This is probably the best theory on why JFK was assassinated that I have ever read:

http://www.michaeljournal.org/lincolnkennedy.htm

 

This reply by dujac is in my opinion quite brilliant really..........and I truly do hope that he is closer to the truth on this topic than I am??????!!!!

 

Although Dujac has presented a powerful case......he has not absolutely proven his point for a number of reasons!

One of them is the fact that the full truth of this topic can only be understood when considered in the full context of American history.

Is it true or not that the money supply, shortly after the American Civil War, was artificially lowered?

Now who would be mostly likely to want a situation like this?

The 56,000 or so business owners who went bankrupt?

I don't think so!


http://www.michaeljournal.org/plenty49.htm

 

A pretty powerful case can be presented that average Americans have been the victim of a long running class struggle.

http://rense.com/general66/nobeyb.htm

 

They first attempted to compare gaydom to the civil rights struggles of African Americans, but that was dashed when African Americans voted no on prop 8.

Now theyre comparing them to Jews during world war II.

I wonder whats next?

 

Actually, lesbians are less like to spread the disease that heterosexuals.

 

OK, let's say that over the next three decades it is proven that low cost natural glyconutrients could have saved the lives of six million victims of HIV over these past three decades if the people who knew about this had showed more courage in getting the information about this out there!!!??

Let's imagine that perhaps the Dr. Lou Rebello theory that adding eighty or ninety trace minerals to fertilizer for a cost of one dollar per person per year could have saved another six million lives of victims of HIV over these past few decades???!!!

What would you call it if not a form of a holocaust???!!!

True....it is not a holocaust where people get arrested and put in concentration camps and gas chambers....but they sure died a horrible death.....and if indeed one of the main causes was cowardice among policy makers and high level medical personnel.........then what would you say was the right word for it????

 

Never. Going. To. Happen. You cannot cure HIV with sugar. The disease does not work that way.

 

That is very true although not well known because the media does not report it widely.

 

Wrong again and of course zero links to back up your laughable theory.

Are lesbian and bisexual women at risk of getting sexually transmitted infections (STIs)?

Women who have sex with women are at risk for STIs. Lesbian and bisexual women can transmit STIs to each other through:

Skin-to-skin contact
Mucosa contact (e.g., mouth to vagina)
Vaginal fluids
Menstrual blood
Sharing sex toys

Some STIs are more common among lesbians and bisexual women and may be passed easily from woman to woman (such as bacterial vaginosis). Other STIs are much less likely to be passed from woman to woman through sex (such as HIV). When lesbians get these less common STIs, it may be because they also have had sex with men, especially when they were younger. It is also important to remember that some of the less common STIs may not be passed between women during sex, but through sharing needles used to inject drugs. Bisexual women may be more likely to get infected with STIs that are less common for lesbians, since bisexuals have typically had sex with men in the past or are presently having sex with a man.

http://womenshealth.gov/publications/our-publications/fact-sheet/lesbian-bisexual-health.cfm

 

You do realize that your own source actually explicitly backed up my claim, don't you?

 

Only on certain STDs. Others as pointed out are more likely to be transmitted. Nice try.

 

The post of mine you responded to was in regards to HIV. And I was correct, lesbians are less likely to contract HIV. Bringing up other diseases is irrelevant.

 

Then I'm sure you can prove it.

 

I said STDs. Never was it limited to AIDS alone.

 

easily

Gay men and lesbians are three times more likely to use illegal drugs than straight people, a British Home Office-funded study says.
The UK Drug Policy Commission report reviewed studies on illegal drug use in ethnic minority groups, disabled people and the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transexual (LGBT)community.It found that people who identified as lesbian, gay or bisexual were three times more likely to have taken drugs in their lifetime than heterosexual people.





Whether it is a coping mechanism in the face of homophobia or just hectic partying is not clear, but new figures suggest that gay people are seven times more likely to take illegal drugs than the general population, with one in five of those surveyed showing signs of dependency on drugs or alcohol.

More than a third of gay, lesbian and bisexual people took at least one illegal drug in the last month, according to the largest study of its kind.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...se-seven-times-higher-among-gays-8165971.html

 

I know, that's the point. I said HIV. What you said was not relevant.