George Zimmerman charged with stalking man working on Trayvon

You seem to be addressing the wrong member. I did not blame Martin the dead victim. Regarding blaming the girl for getting raped for allegedly acting slutty I would ask the liberals on this forum if that is something they do. Maybe some of them will reply to your query.

 

With a chance meeting between two individuals ho were less than perfect, and one was more prone to engaging in unprovoked physical violence than the other.

Evidence that cannot actually be comprehended on the part of yourself.

Try and present a coherent question that is not seething with the mentality of black superiority, and hatred for those of all other races.

Was the office of the coroner engaging in deceit when they determined the trajectory of the bullet could only be achieved if George Zimmerman was on the ground, with Trayvon Martin directly on top of him?

Then an answer to the question on the part of yourself, as to how George Zimmerman did not have any blood from Trayvon Martin on his person, is already possessed on the part of yourself.

What is simply not realized on the part of yourself, is that in your zeal to rush to the defense of Trayvon Martin, to paint George Zimmerman as being a murderer, a successful effort was made into luring you into demonstrating that you already knew the answer to the question you were presenting, but chose to present it anyway. You allowed yourself to succumb to target fixation and charged ahead without thinking, thus demonstrated shortsightedness.

It is yourself making the claim of possessing intimated knowledge of exactly what occurred on the night in question. You tell us exactly what was claimed and what was not claimed.

It was never claimed on the part of myself that George Zimmerman did not shoot Travyon Martin.

It is being noted that humans as a species are imperfect. What any particular individual believes they know is quickly forgotten in times of excitement or surprise. Startle someone in the street to a degree that accelerates the speed of their cardiovascular system, and they will not even be able to recall their own name until they have sufficiently calmed down.

Then perhaps there is a legitimate reason for such. Especially when Trayvon Martin was engaged in illegal activities in the time leading up to the chance encounter.

 

More accurately, the accusation being leveled against yourself pertains to blaming George Zimmerman for being subjected to criminal assault.

 

George goes bezerk because he is invited to participate in a documentary of his act of murder and his fans go nuts supporting him.

 

No, Zimmerman was the cause of this meeting. Had he gone on to Target or wherever the **** he was going that kid would be alive today.

What is the evidence, post it. Don't talk about it, be about it.

Nice cop out. There is not a damn thing that I have asked you that has anything to do with black superiority.

Zimmerman said Trayvon was on top of him when he fired, now you are claiming that is not true.

He didn't have any blood on him, his or Trayvon's. How is that? How is that he had no grass or mud on him. Go outside and slide across the ground and see if there is not going to be something on the back of jacket, no scratches, marks, nothing. Come on you claim to be smarter than that.

Zimmerman is a murderer, he got off because of shotty work by the police, a deadbeat prosecutor and a racist jury.

You made that claim, about a evidence to prove your claim and blah, blah, blah. When asked to produce that evidence you start tap dancing and try to run to something new just as you are doing now.

No ****, you would be an idiot to try and make that claim.

Here is another prime example of bullshit excuse making. You can't explain, so you throw out this weak ass excuses.

So now it's illegal for a black teenager to walk home from the store and talk on his cellphone. What a disgrace.

 

no zimmerman is an idiot who doesnt even know how to stay out of trouble.

 

If Zimmerman had been the aggressor, it wouldn't have been self-defense. As you said, he was the adult, he was armed and he was the one watching Martin yet the jury found him innocent. Why? The evidence proved a clear case of self-defense.

 

He stopped and was returning to the car. Of course, he also lost Martin so it could have been for that reason. I didn't AssUMe; it's in the court testimony and forensics backs up the Zimmerman version.

You already admitted you don't want to know anything about, so it's understandable that you don't know about witnesses.

Tell it to the jury. You AssUMe that you know all the facts, have admitted you don't want to learn anything more then you make a conclusion. Clearly you are very sorry you didn't get your lynching. Sad.

 

Agreed. He'd already lost Zimmerman once. Why did Martin return if not to confront Zimmerman?

 

Now that's a lie. Martin was NOT engaged in any illegal activities. He was walking home from the store and talking on the phone..

Poor sick Zimmerman cooked all that up in his fantasies.

 

He didn't get in trouble for self-defense.

 

We cannot undo the decision of the jury. I find it flawed but it is done. You and I can disagree for an eternity but nothing will change.

 

Flawed because they followed the law instead of public opinion.

 

Zimmerman wasn't found innocent.. He was found not guilty because the prosecution couldn't make their case. It is what it is.

 

That is true and it is time to stop trying this case over and over. A teen us dead and he renames dead. A murderer talks around free to harass people, threaten girlfriends, threaten his former father on law, andvsomeday hevwill murder again.

 

They couldn't make their case because he was innocent. There was so little evidence that the DA didn't even want to charge him. The Feds swept in to give life to the case thanks to the racist Kenyan socialist and his beotch at Justice.

 

Do you believe a person is innocent until proven guilty? Yes, he shot Martin, that is fact. Zimmerman was charged with murder, but the jury found there was insufficient evidence to convict Zimmerman, also fact despite all of the wailing by the anti-Zimmerman/pro-Martin members of this forum.

 

You've convicted Zimmerman in your head, but killing in self-defense is not murder since it was not premeditated nor unlawful to defend oneself.

mur·der ˈmərdər/
noun the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another

 

That's absurd... Obama was neither a Kenyan nor a socialist.

Zimmerman beat the rap.. Its as simple as that, but he's still a dumb aggressive, do nothing.

 

As I said Zimmerman committed the moral equivalent of murder.

 

Yeah, he attacked someone and got shot for it, self-defense still matters...

 

Ahhh, thanks for the backpedal. So Zimmerman isn't a murderer, he's now guilty of committing the "moral equivalent of murder". What is that exactly? Do you think every soldier, sailor, airman and Marine who kills someone has committed "the moral equivalent of murder"? How about police officers who use lawful lethal force to stop a criminal? Are they committing "the moral equivalent of murder"? A woman who shoots a home invader or rapist? Looking forward to your honest answers about what is and what is not "the moral equivalent of murder".

 

Agreed on Obama, disagreed on Zimmerman. He lawfully defended himself. In his position, I'd have fired more than one shot....but Zimmerman was a bit of an idiot.

 

I am not back peddling. I stated in many of the posts here in this thread that Zimmerman committed the moral equivalent of murder. He was not convicted of murder but he is one.

Do you believe that OJ murdered his ex wife and her friend? OJ was also not convicted by a corrupt jury but isn't OJ a murderer just not legally a murderer?

 

Had Trayvon Martin not left his younger sibling home alone without an adult present, perhaps he would still be alive today as well.

It was yourself who stated previously about not needing to read anything to know what happened that night.

Other than demonstrating the belief that not one single thing done by Trayvon Martin qualified as being wrong. Not illegal, but rather wrong.

No such claim was made on the part of myself. Perhaps if there was not such a mad rush to respond on the part of yourself, such misunderstandings would not occur.

Explain it for everyone present and observing this back and forth engagement being performed on the part of yourself and the part of myself.

Even the black woman on the jury was racist?

And the claim presented on the part of yourself was about not needing to read anything to know exactly what transpired on the night in question. Meaning it is believed on the part of yourself that everything which is relevant is already possessed by yourself.

Then do not try and claim that such is being stated on the part of myself.

It is quite apparent from the manner of address being demonstrated, that there have never been any experiences or encounters had on the part of yourself that have significantly triggered the fight-or-flight response, resulting in a surging of adrenaline and suppression of higher, finer neurological skills. There is no possession of knowledge pertaining to how the real world actually work when a situation potentially turns ugly, when confronted by a possible threat or questionable incident. Thus suggesting the name selected by yourself is greatly inaccurate.

Except for the fact that the above mentioned activity was not the illegal activity being referred to. Rather it is the numerous physical confrontations Trayvon Martin engaged in while at school, along with the damaging of school property with graffiti, possession of stolen property while on school grounds, possession of a burglary tool while on school grounds, possession of drug paraphernalia while on school grounds, all of which led to him being suspended from school. There is also the fact he engaged in the illegal, recreational use of a schedule one substance with such regularity it earned him the nickname "weedhead" from one of his friends. He was also involved in the drug trade according to his own text messages, and was looking into procuring a handgun, again according to his own text messages.

All of this was occurring in the weeks and months that ultimately led up to the chance meeting with George Zimmerman. And while such was obviously not known at the time, it demonstrates a matter of illegal behavior that was showing no signs of stopping. This, coupled with the fact that Trayvon Martin had marijuana in his system at the time of his death, indicates he was still engaged in illegal behavior while living with his father in the neighborhood.