Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Global Quackery: Earth Has Not Warmed For Past 19 Years, New Study Finds

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by guavaball, May 10, 2017.

Page 3 of 7
  1. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,244
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So his science was wrong? I thought he was saying what 97% of "scientist" say.
     
    TheGreatSatan, May 12, 2017
    #51
  2. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes his science is wrong. Duh
     
    Vegas giants, May 12, 2017
    #52
  3. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,244
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But he's right now? At least he had the guts to make a prediction based on what he "believed".
     
    TheGreatSatan, May 12, 2017
    #53
  4. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Holy cow. You guys get so much wrong. Try getting your science from NASA. Now.....did they make that prediction? Lol
     
    Vegas giants, May 12, 2017
    #54
  5. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,758
    Likes Received:
    74,222
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    So this is an article in a dodgy news source quoting another article (which it does not even link to let alone reference properly in another dodgy news source which allegedly quotes what may or may not be a valid argument which may or may not be from a source that may or may not be in English

    And you lot think the Guardian is "fake news" :roll:

    DO NOT CONFUSE POOR JOURNALISM WITH GOOD SCIENCE!!!
     
    Bowerbird, May 12, 2017
    #55
  6. Jimmy79

    Jimmy79 Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2014
    Messages:
    9,366
    Likes Received:
    5,074
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Science has a 2 fold problem.

    First is that this bit of science has become so profitable for the researchers that no one is going to dispute it and risk a loss of funding.
    Second, the science and the scientists have become too politicized. To be taken seriously, you need to be able to show at least the appearance of being impartial to the findings. We can all agree that is NOT the case in this field.

    On a personal note, I think the world is in a warming stage that human factors have accelerated and magnified to a small degree.
     
    Jimmy79, May 12, 2017
    #56
  7. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,758
    Likes Received:
    74,222
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Except that - it has already been a least partly responsible for at least one war

    http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00059.1

    http://www.news.com.au/technology/i...s/news-story/a6bc542349d031b78bf26acc96401d52

    https://scholar.google.com.au/schol...ved=0ahUKEwjfi5ulyevTAhXHybwKHW7nD3oQgQMIGTAA
     
    Bowerbird, May 12, 2017
    #57
    VietVet likes this.
  8. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are welcome to prove your bullshit theory true. Not that you can of course.

    Need another English speaking study? No problem.

    http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11...ns-again-just-in-time-for-un-summit-in-paris/

    Oops



    Another perfect example of liberal emotion vs cold hard facts. Thanks for staying predictable.
     
    Last edited: May 12, 2017
    guavaball, May 12, 2017
    #58
  9. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,244
    Trophy Points:
    113
    NASA has scientist. 97% apparently agree with Gore.
     
    TheGreatSatan, May 12, 2017
    #59
    guavaball likes this.
  10. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wonder if those same 97% agreed that New York and Florida would be underwater by now too :D
     
    guavaball, May 12, 2017
    #60
    TheGreatSatan likes this.
  11. VietVet

    VietVet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    4,198
    Likes Received:
    4,859
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Now there you go, introducing facts and ruining perfectly good rants.
    Why some think they know more than scientists do is beyond me, but THEY DON'T.
    The Koch Brothers are laughing, I am sure.
     
    VietVet, May 12, 2017
    #61
    edthecynic likes this.
  12. VietVet

    VietVet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    4,198
    Likes Received:
    4,859
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Rove tactic -
    When you cannot defend your position, deflect.

    Yeah, the earth isn't warming, the ice-free Northwest Passage just hadn't been found earlier....
     
    VietVet, May 12, 2017
    #62
  13. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No son. Not on everything. Holy cow
     
    Vegas giants, May 12, 2017
    #63
  14. Vegas giants

    Vegas giants Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Messages:
    49,909
    Likes Received:
    5,343
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you knew anything about science....forget it
     
    Vegas giants, May 12, 2017
    #64
    VietVet likes this.
  15. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,758
    Likes Received:
    74,222
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Oops

    For a start that link is NOT to a research article and secondly it has been written by Monkton. The most discredited denier on the planet posted on climate depot run by "Intimidate where you cannot debate" Marc Moreno
     
    Bowerbird, May 12, 2017
    #65
    VietVet likes this.
  16. VietVet

    VietVet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    4,198
    Likes Received:
    4,859
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    VietVet, May 12, 2017
    #66
  17. Denizen

    Denizen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2013
    Messages:
    10,424
    Likes Received:
    5,355
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It didn't work for you. Will it be my superior intellect that swings it.
     
    Denizen, May 12, 2017
    #67
  18. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,134
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    But you only accept Democrat party approved sites, eh?

    Does it strike you as hypocritical that to travel, Obama flies on expensive airlines, carrying security and his guests, gets there to a convoy of vehicles some also containing security forces.

    For a man that alarmed over climate to act that way daily, does it mock your efforts?
     
    Robert, May 12, 2017
    #68
  19. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,134
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If your alarmist crowd gave us something credible, we just might be persuaded to worry.
     
    Robert, May 12, 2017
    #69
  20. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    vman12, May 12, 2017
    #70
  21. VietVet

    VietVet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    4,198
    Likes Received:
    4,859
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That is silly - only the GOP wants to return to the age of coal.

    I would accept a scientific site, not a political one.
     
    VietVet, May 12, 2017
    #71
  22. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,244
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Who wants coal? I think we need nuclear like the rest of the world. We also need batteries.
     
    TheGreatSatan, May 12, 2017
    #72
  23. Esperance

    Esperance Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2017
    Messages:
    5,151
    Likes Received:
    4,379
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They are Progressive elites. The are the top 4% and quite capable of placing shackles and chains on the bottom 96%.

    Obama's use of the words, "Hope and Change," were really just code words for, "Rope and Chains."
     
    Last edited: May 12, 2017
    Esperance, May 12, 2017
    #73
  24. HereWeGoAgain

    HereWeGoAgain Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2016
    Messages:
    27,942
    Likes Received:
    19,979
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is no such report.

    If you claim otherwise, post a link to the original report.
     
    Last edited: May 12, 2017
    HereWeGoAgain, May 12, 2017
    #74
  25. In The Dark

    In The Dark Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2014
    Messages:
    3,374
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Rove can't fix stupid either.
     
    In The Dark, May 13, 2017
    #75
Page 3 of 7

Share This Page