Gloria Allred’s Blunder on Roy Moore’s Yearbook Challenge

The GOP has been searching for a high profile pedofile to replace Denny Hastert for years. Cut 'em a little slack. Dating 14 year olds is as Alabaman as mustard greens and public lynchings. Moore is a perfect candidate to represent the Alabama GOP. Somewhere in hell, old Bull Conner is smiling.

 

If Alabama's White evangelicals actually want Moore to represent them to the nation, he will represent them.

To the GOP's chagrin, he will represent them as well.

 

And more Alinsky tactics. Attack the source when you can not respond to the question. Good work - Saul would be proud.

 

And...he does it again.

Apparently AFM thinks is he/she shouts ALINSKY!! enough times this serves as a good rebuttal to his defense of a completely fake made-up website.

Weakest.
of.
teas.
ever.

"I Love the Poorly Educated" - DJT

 

The use of the Alinsky tactics are clear. Good job. Avoid all discussion and attack the source. Notice how the shrillness is increasing??

 

I just had an even bigger chuckle. For ****s and grins, I typed in Alinksy + AFM in the search engine here, partially because I was seriously wondering if this may be a bot I'm exchanging posts with -- whenever a "poster" reuses a word in near every post, that's a clue. I mean, what's the use of talking with a bot? I've encountered this before on a few other websites. Why waste the time?

Now it could just be he/she learned this throw away line and thinks it an effective counter (which it's not) -- but I did see, in the last few months -- this: (and there are still numerous more...)

1. Gloria Allred’s Blunder on Roy Moore’s Yearbook Challenge
   The use of the Alinsky tactics are clear. Good job. Avoid all discussion and attack the source. Notice how the shrillness is increasing??
   Post by: AFM, 16 minutes ago in forum: Elections & Campaigns
2. 
   Gloria Allred’s Blunder on Roy Moore’s Yearbook Challenge
   And more Alinsky tactics. Attack the source when you can not respond to the question. Good work - Saul would be proud.
   Post by: AFM, Today at 7:45 PM in forum: Elections & Campaigns
3. 
   Gloria Allred’s Blunder on Roy Moore’s Yearbook Challenge
   ...you go again. But that's what illib prog smear merchants do. Alinsky would be very proud. You will have to ask Marion Talley about the tweet...
   Post by: AFM, Today at 6:11 PM in forum: Elections & Campaigns
4. 
   Gloria Allred’s Blunder on Roy Moore’s Yearbook Challenge
   There you go again. Alinsky would be proud. More intellectually dishonest responses from the party of goodness.
   Post by: AFM, Today at 3:18 PM in forum: Elections & Campaigns
5. 
   New Poll Shows WaPo’s Politicized Smear Against Ten Commandments Judge Roy Moore is Backfiring
   Alinsky would be proud.
   Post by: AFM, Nov 14, 2017 in forum: Current Events
6. 
   New Poll Shows WaPo’s Politicized Smear Against Ten Commandments Judge Roy Moore is Backfiring
   And more of the same. Alinsky would be proud.
   Post by: AFM, Nov 13, 2017 in forum: Current Events
7. 
   New Poll Shows WaPo’s Politicized Smear Against Ten Commandments Judge Roy Moore is Backfiring
   The smears continue. The ignorance and malice displayed above is breathtaking. But that's what Alinsky-ites do.
   Post by: AFM, Nov 13, 2017 in forum: Current Events
8. 
   ROY MOORE SMEARED IN A WITCHES HUNT BREW
   ...only a few days after the deadline for any replacement of Moore as a candidate. It's all part of the Alinsky Rules for Radicals. It's disgusting.
   Post by: AFM, Nov 12, 2017 in forum: Political Opinions & Beliefs
9. 
   Roland Martin Completely RIPS John Kelly’s Civil War Comments: ‘Shame On You!’
   That's what lib progs do. Their resort to Alinsky tactics is very easy to spot and hilarious as the above insults and personal attacks shows....
   Post by: AFM, Nov 4, 2017 in forum: Current Events
10. 
    Roland Martin Completely RIPS John Kelly’s Civil War Comments: ‘Shame On You!’
    There is nothing dismissive about identifying the use of Alinsky's Rules for Radicals. They are tactics used to avoid the truth and attack those...
    Post by: AFM, Nov 4, 2017 in forum: Current Events
11. 
    Roland Martin Completely RIPS John Kelly’s Civil War Comments: ‘Shame On You!’
    ...That's hilarious. And equally funny is another attempt by the party of goodness to turn the Alinsky Rules back around to those who think...
    Post by: AFM, Nov 3, 2017 in forum: Current Events
12. 
    Roland Martin Completely RIPS John Kelly’s Civil War Comments: ‘Shame On You!’
    So funny when the party of goodness advocates attempt to turn their Alinsky tactics back on those that don't agree with their false narratives....
    Post by: AFM, Nov 3, 2017 in forum: Current Events
13. 
    Roland Martin Completely RIPS John Kelly’s Civil War Comments: ‘Shame On You!’
    ...today. It is a construct of the lib progs using the past to paint the present. It is a false narrative right out of the Alinsky rule book.
    Post by: AFM, Nov 3, 2017 in forum: Current Events
14. 
    Roland Martin Completely RIPS John Kelly’s Civil War Comments: ‘Shame On You!’
    It's fun to see the Alinsky Rules in action. Hilarious in fact.
    Post by: AFM, Nov 3, 2017 in forum: Current Events
15. 
    Roland Martin Completely RIPS John Kelly’s Civil War Comments: ‘Shame On You!’
    That's another Alinsky Rule. If you have nothing then demonize everyone. It's easy to pick out those who have nothing except to project the past...
    Post by: AFM, Nov 3, 2017 in forum: Current Events
16. 
    Roland Martin Completely RIPS John Kelly’s Civil War Comments: ‘Shame On You!’
    ...- neo confederates is a term coined by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Now there is an excellent example of Alinsky's Rules for Radicals in...
    Post by: AFM, Nov 3, 2017 in forum: Current Events
17. 
    Roland Martin Completely RIPS John Kelly’s Civil War Comments: ‘Shame On You!’
    The South attempted to secede from the Union. Ah, and now we have a new Alinsky buzz word - neoconfederates. Pathetic.
    Post by: AFM, Nov 3, 2017 in forum: Current Events
18. 
    Roland Martin Completely RIPS John Kelly’s Civil War Comments: ‘Shame On You!’
    ...Paid laborers are not property. Your attempts at derogatory humor are amusing but juvenile. But that's what Alinsky has trained lib progs to do.
    Post by: AFM, Nov 3, 2017 in forum: Current Events
19. 
    Roland Martin Completely RIPS John Kelly’s Civil War Comments: ‘Shame On You!’
    Fake facts are sleazy tactics. Alinsky would be proud.
    Post by: AFM, Nov 3, 2017 in forum: Current Events
20. 
    Roland Martin Completely RIPS John Kelly’s Civil War Comments: ‘Shame On You!’
    ...of the lib progs those who "utter" the facts are racists. It's a very lazy and dishonest tactic straight out of Alinsky's Rules for Radicals.
    Post by: AFM, Nov 1, 2017 in forum: Current Events
21. 
    Post
    Discovered: Manafort "Colluded" With Russians on Behalf of Clinton Allies
    ...information. The D party of goodness (and hypocrisy) actually paid the Russians to create fake news on Trump. Carry on ye disciples of Alinsky.
    Post by: AFM, Oct 26, 2017 in forum: Current Events
22. 
    Discovered: Manafort "Colluded" With Russians on Behalf of Clinton Allies
    ...to read and rebut the documented facts. It's a knee jerk Alinsky tactical response. What do you suggest as the basis for the investigation ??
    Post by: AFM, Oct 25, 2017 in forum: Current Events
23. 
    Wilson demands apology from Kelly for ‘character assassination’
    More of the Alinsky smear merchants in action. It's hilarious. And in reality the opposite.
    Post by: AFM, Oct 24, 2017 in forum: Current Events
24. 
    Wilson demands apology from Kelly for ‘character assassination’
    More juxtaposition ?? Come'on man that's weak. Alinsky would be disappointed.
    Post by: AFM, Oct 24, 2017 in forum: Current Events
25. 
    Wilson demands apology from Kelly for ‘character assassination’
    Funny stuff. It's amusing to see what those afflicted with TDS come up with next. Go to the Alinsky Rules for more ideas.
    Post by: AFM, Oct 24, 2017 in forum: Current Events
26. 
    
27. Wilson demands apology from Kelly for ‘character assassination’
    And the smear merchants continue. Alinsky would be proud.
    Post by: AFM, Oct 23, 2017 in forum: Current Events
28. 
    Post
    Wilson demands apology from Kelly for ‘character assassination’
    That's what smear artists do - facts are irrelevant. Saul Alinsky
    Post by: AFM, Oct 22, 2017 in forum: Current Events
29. 
    Trump Denies Family Claim He Disrespected Fallen Soldier
    Funny stuff. The smear artists are now desperate to defend their disgusting position. Alinsky would be actually be embarrassed by their lameness.
    Post by: AFM, Oct 20, 2017 in forum: Current Events
30. 
    Post
    Trump Denies Family Claim He Disrespected Fallen Soldier
    Funny stuff. The smear artists are now desperate to defend their disgusting position. Alinsky would be actually be embarrassed by their lameness.
    Post by: AFM, Oct 20, 2017 in forum: Current Events
31. 
    
    Trump Denies Family Claim He Disrespected Fallen Soldier
    Funny stuff. The smear artists are now desperate to defend their disgusting position. Alinsky would be actually be embarrassed by their lameness.
    Post by: AFM, Oct 20, 2017 in forum: Current Events

 

• <cont>
  
• 
  
• 
  Trump Denies Family Claim He Disrespected Fallen Soldier
  There it is - the switch to wording which cleverly avoids the acknowledgement of the smear. Nice job. Alinsky would be proud.
  Post by: AFM, Oct 20, 2017 in forum: Current Events
• 
  Bergdahl Pleads Guilty to Desertion
  That's hilarious - and a great example of the David Brock smear machine tactic and the true Alinsky rules.
  Post by: AFM, Oct 7, 2017 in forum: Latest US & World News
• 
  ‘Death spiral’: Tillerson makes nice but may not last long with Trump
  ...that any action is justified to prevent those evil individuals who don't agree with the lib prog narrative. Carry on soldier of Alinsky.
  Post by: AFM, Oct 6, 2017 in forum: Current Events
• 
  7 Deceptive Claims Jimmy Kimmel Made About Guns in One Monologue
  ...do. When people disagree with their "party of goodness" "conclusions" they are attacked because they are obviously evil. Alinsky Rules in action.
  Post by: AFM, Oct 4, 2017 in forum: Current Events
• 
  Trump: ‘A Lot Of Shippers’ Don’t Want Me To Waive The Jones Act To Help Puerto Rico
  ...you say is directed towards "proving" that Trump is a racist. Alinsky would be proud of your efforts. Carry on like all the lib progs...
  
  Defeating the bogeyman of single payer healthcare
  How about honestly understanding the flaws in the Canadian health care system that drives that growing number of Canadians out of the country for...
  Post by: AFM, Sep 24, 2017 in forum: Political Opinions & Beliefs
• 
  I’m a Conservative College Student. The First Amendment Is Dying on Campuses Like Mine.
  ...and vehemently denied by lib progs. They immediately go into Alinsky/Brock smear tactics attacking both the poster and author of any...
  Post by: AFM, Sep 24, 2017 in forum: Political Opinions & Beliefs
• 
  Trump to NFL owners: Fire players who kneel during anthem
  There you have it. Identity politics, Alinsky tactics, and TDS all packaged into two little sentences.
  Post by: AFM, Sep 24, 2017 in forum: Latest US & World News
• 
  Should Homosexual Conduct be Illegal?
  All your points are absurd. But that's the lib prog ideology founded on identity politics and the Alinsky Rules for Radicals.
  Post by: AFM, Sep 24, 2017 in forum: Political Opinions & Beliefs
• 
  Should Homosexual Conduct be Illegal?
  ...decade. And finally your statement that conservatives hate Muslims is absurd. But right in line with Alinsky's Rules. Saul would be proud of...
  Post by: AFM, Sep 24, 2017 in forum: Political Opinions & Beliefs
• 
  Defeating the bogeyman of single payer healthcare
  Ahh - there it is. Alinsky rules - attack the source when you can't attack the data. Saul would have been proud. The issue is that the 52K...
  Post by: AFM, Sep 23, 2017 in forum: Political Opinions & Beliefs
• 
  Trump's U. N. speech
  Now there is a witty response. Alinsky would be embarrassed by that one.
  Post by: AFM, Sep 22, 2017 in forum: Political Opinions & Beliefs
• 
  Defeating the bogeyman of single payer healthcare
  ...When asked for factual backup they react to those evil enquiries with personal attacks and insults. It's the Alinsky Rules for Radicals method.
  Post by: AFM, Sep 21, 2017 in forum: Political Opinions & Beliefs
• 
  Driving over protestors, was NOT A LARK. Republican lawmaker vows to run over protesters who block h
  ...liberal progressives to enable the smear machine to attack individuals whom do not fall in step with the party of goodness. Alinsky would be...
  
• 
  
  Driving over protestors, was NOT A LARK. Republican lawmaker vows to run over protesters who block h
  ...the dishonest portrayal of his actual statement. It's use of the Alinsky Rules for Radicals to smear the Congressman. That's all liberal...
  
• 
  Driving over protestors, was NOT A LARK. Republican lawmaker vows to run over protesters who block h
  ...said. And then use the "hack network" to distribute the lie. It's Alinsky's Rules for Radicals. And it's fundamentally and totally dishonest.

==========
Near 50. And there is more.

So, AFM, "whoever" you are, I wish you luck in your crusade. I'm done with you.

Maybe you're just young. I don't know, but some advice you may wish to consider: effective debaters do more than just bark out limp lines repetitively as is on view here. Perhaps you may wish to consider another tactic. It couldn't hurt. Just sayin'...

Have a nice day.

 

Yes, Alinsky tactics are used by the lefties on this and many other forums. Notice the pattern on this thread. PW claims that a website is a complete fake news site and backs that up by some website to prove it followed by personal attacks and insults. I ask what is inaccurate about the piece. PW copies a tweet/facebook entry which questions the age of Ms. Corfman claiming that this proves the entire website is fake news and in Alinsky fashion followed by a deluge of personal attacks and insults. I correctly identify Alinsky tactics which is to personalize and demonize and avoid discussion of facts. This goes on for several exchanges and then the post above which is again a display of Alinsky tactics.

And of course the final Alinsky tactic "I wish you luck in your crusade. I'm done with you." with again no actual discussion about the website completing the Alinsky Rules for Radicals cycle. Congratulations - Saul would be proud of such a fine follower of his mindless principles

The last paragraph contains the completely ironic statement "effective debaters do more than just bark out limp lines repetitively as is on view here. Perhaps you may wish to consider another tactic. It couldn't hurt. Just sayin'..." Coming from yourself, a practicing Alinsky disciple, that is just hilarious.

 

My last, last to-do with you: Eight Alinsky's in one post! A new record.

Bravo, brave cap-a-tan!

 

And there it is again. Repitition is the ultimate compliment to Saul.

 

I sure hope for the sake of the victims, you are a better counselor than political debater.

Like Obama reflexively taking the side of a Black man when involved in a possible racial confrontation, you take the side of the woman no matter that it's most likely false. You ignore any facts that don't fit your man hating narrative. I don't dismiss a 14 year old who is sexually assaulted by an adult man, that's not the issue here, the issue is there is a good chance that the accuser is lying. Her history makes her completely unreliable. You are the one who brought up Allred's party and now that I called you out for your false statement that she was a Republican now you move the goalposts and say she's very intelligent because she's a Democrat. Ha! So intelligent that I see her being sued for that fraud of a yearbook, so intelligent that the CA board is taking action against her. A corrupt, money chasing fraud, but because she's a woman, she's your hero. I take the side of women when the evidence shows they were the victim. I get it, you were assaulted and as a counselor you get fed a constant diet of wrong doing by men, so you naturally hate men. But there is due process in this country and wild accusations should not be used to smear or destroy a person because you don't agree with their politics.

 

I've seen the same data elsewhere. You got something to refute it?

 

You are the one using Alinsky tactics. I'm just pointing it out but only eight times in this thread. I'm sure there are many more.

 

Wow you call her man hating? This is probably one of the most woman hating posts I’ve seen. You learn about a person by the side of the argument he defends. You assume the girl is lying. She is not being sued for the yearbook..Someone as experienced as Allred I am sure had it verified. Why isn’t Moore suing?
When there are about seven other women who had similar experiences when they were teenagers who do not know each other and have nothing to gain perhaps there is truth there along with the fact that he admits he had a thing for teenage girls when he was in his 30s. If these women were Democrats at least your argument would have a little validity but they weren’t. You can defend a child predator...And then you wonder why girls and women don’t report sexual abuse. It’s men like you who don’t believe them

 

There is only one accuser whose description rises to a criminal offense. No one knows the truth of what happened. And most likely no one ever will. That's the reality.

 

The MSM has not demanded that the yearbook be subjected to forensic scrutiny. They don't want their buddy Allred to lose her law license. The yearbook is a hoax.

 

Yes. Surely there is a screen shot or something which could be used. But the fact remains why Allred has not published a copy of the page for public scrutiny.

 

And that is why sexual abusers and rapists have gotten away with their crimes. But when six women had similar experiences with the same man, And they did not know each other and they have nothing to gain, I don’t see how anyone could support Moore

 

We have all seen it, It’s been available for scrutiny...I wonder why Moore isn’t demanding that. I wonder why FOXNews isn’t saying it is false. Do you really believe AlRed would put herself in a position to be easily proven to be false ? Come on use commonsense

 

I hope you are sharing this information with the law because obviously you have some information that you can make your fantasy factual. . And obviously the mainstream media is all part of a mass conspiracy. I think that is conspiracy number 3286. They are all meeting in a secret Cabal figuring out how to save her from losing her license. You’re too funny

 

But there is only one who alleges any sexual crime.

 

If Allred knows it is legit then she should offer proof by authentication. She want to convict Moore in the court of public opinion and this would be another nail in the coffin. And what's the crime here again ??

 

A better question would be why isn’t moore showing it isn’t authentic? We have all seen it. Has he publicly denied that he wrote that? Once he does that then she will produce the authenticity. The I am sure she probably has the proof but is waiting to nail his coffin as you say. The crime is having a 14-year-old girl touch your penis and the other teenagers telling of similar things...I hope you don’t have a daughter

 

But there are girls who attest to the fact that he was inappropriate with them. No there was only one girl he committed an actual sexual crime with. But I guess we just have different values. A 32-year-old man hanging out trying to pick up high school girls is not the kind of person I think should be representing us in the Senate. A man who believes that a Muslim should not be allowed to serve in Congress is not the kind of person I think should be representing us. I guess you believe that the Bible should come before the constitution. As I say we have different values

 

All I'm interested in is due process. Moore is getting none of that. IMO he will get due process in the Senate ethics committee if elected to the US Senate. They can subpoena anyone and anything that is required. The "due process" these days seems to be belief of anything said of anyone by anybody. There was a person on Tucker Carlson last night who seemed perfectly OK with believing it all and perfectly OK with any resulting innocent men having their lives ruined as collateral damage in the pursuit of the greater good.

You don't know if any of this is true. And again there is only one who alleges any criminal behavior.

And the "I hope you don’t have a daughter" is just stupid. How's this "I hope you don’t have a son who is ever falsely accused of sexually abusing anyone."