Ok, so far in the new edit , in which I have had some good help A proposal for consideration of a N-field quantum theory. - S.P. Leese, (credentials : Approximately 10 years of experience on science forums) Spring 2018 Abstract: This paper proposes a theory of a “R³ real coordinate space-energy ''matrix'', similar to, but not exactly like the classical "matrix"., that may describe the primary source of energy for a given system. First will be shown is that the formation of energy is a two part construct , with either part of the processing , the mechanics failing to retain form without the co-existence of the opposite sign. Second, a co-existence matrix shall be established that is governed by simultaneous manifestations at the same geometric point. Additionally, such co-existence that may also explain and answer a normalising that is , “neutral” being attracted to “neutral”, phenomenon of the gravity process. Definitions and axiomatic information: Before any discussion can meaningfully continue several contextual definitions must be accepted. A “R³ real coordinate space-energy matrix'' shall be defined as an Euclidean volume of space. Within this matrix is a 3 dimensional array of coordinate values, and/or elements. Finally let i = a mono pole positive polarity 1.60217733(49)E-19 C and let j = a mono pole negative polarity equal to 1.6021765 × 10−19 coulomb Queries As defined, is the following possible? i ∈ [a] Could i exist individually? Would all the individual points of i be repulsive to all other points of i? Would i be in an automatic state of expansion? As defined, is the following possible? j ∈ [a] Could j exist individually? Would all the individual points of j be repulsive to all other points of j? Would j be in an automatic state of expansion? I propose that both i and j could not exist as a thing with distinct and independent existence. By the laws of Physics and Coulomb's laws, it is quite clear that all individual points of i would be repulsive to all individual points of i, all individual points of j would be repulsive to all individual points of j. In a state of individual existence, both i and j would most certainly be in an immediate state of expansion. to be continued.......
That isn't a credential. That is a hobby. How many formal, guided study homework problems have you done? You do hours and hours of guided, graded math, every night, for years. That just gets you past Calculus. This is where most learning occurs. Why would most people prefer to screw around on the internet instead of taking real classes? Real classes are too hard and too much real work. That's what it takes to understand this stuff.
You hire a painter and decorator, would you rather have one fresh from a decorating course or one that was timed served and has picked up lots of tips and tricks and many skills? Granted I do not know that much in reality, but the subjects that are of an interest to me , I know very well. What you are not considering is that I have had many different teachers over the time period that have shared many thoughts and explanation. I do not just have the memory of what a single teacher could teach me, I have the thoughts of many . Science has told me what time is and what gravity is without telling me direct. Gravity was quite obvious in all reality. Pick up any single object around you and ask yourself these questions. Is the atomic negative charge of the object attracted to the atomic positive charge of everything else around you? Is the atomic positive charge of the object attracted to the atomic negative charge of everything else around you? If both answers are yes, then you have just confirmed Neutral is attracted to neutral for atomic negative charge and atomic positive charge are properties of the object. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb's_law Now drop your object and witness the attractive force and when it hits the ground witness the likewise repulsive force , quantum physicality. In math q1 + q2 = N or you can do (-e) + (+1e) = 0 N = neutral My N-field is a neutral field theory that is a unification of two opposite polarity fields that make up quantum mass and explains neutral is attracted to neutral and also neutral is repulsed by neutral. Because science told me that a negative polarity and a positive polarity is a property of an atom. These properties do not discontinue to function just because they are united. added- Here is the force vectors →← N N ←→ N N
Seemingly most science forums are run by the members who sway mods , none of the forums seem interested in any real science being done.
