No, you aren't. Nothing in your reply actually addressed the subject at all. Which has nothing to do with the person or action in this case just as I said.
I believe it is a better place to start than by expecting the same guys who brought you TARP and Romneycare to bring it to heel.
At the risk of retaining a committed state collectivist ideologue for 4 more years who's done nothing but ADD to the expense, scope and authority of central government. to each their own, dear.
Yes, but that's not enough. We need to investigate noteworthy liberals and left leaning organizations. If we find even a shred of evidence which can link this shooter to these liberal pundits or organizations, we need to censor and possibly incarcerate them. /sarcasm
No risk, darling, if people remembered that they are libertarians, minarchists, tribalists, and anarchists and voted for a candidate that actually mimics their position in both deeds and rhetoric as opposed to just lying, lying, lying and hoping we won't notice their voting record in Congress or their record as governor.
Obama had a mighty weight of words, look where it got him... If we want change it has to be a fundamental change that starts at local government and works its way up, just putting someone in the WH is asking for failure as the two parties will work as one to crush the outsider...
Yet you ignore Obama's and his complicit media's continuous "lying, lying, lying"... that not only delivered an agenda laden state collectivist to the presidency of a Constitutional Republic... but are conspiring to do everything humanly possible to keep one there... including SIMPLY LOVING the hardheaded libertarian contengency's "principled", but ill-timed stance. (getting that feeling again )
Please stop with the ill-timed stance. This has been my "entire time stance" if you will look at all of my posts from the beginning. I might ask you to actually identify those policies that your candidate has put forth and accomplished and list those which you agree with. You're acting like a 16 year old girl on Prom Night, believing that the guy who wants to screw you really loves you.
That's hardly the point, DC is about power, and neither party will give it up from a top down approach. You have to do it from the bottom up...
Here, I get the feeling that you only have gut feelings about Obama, so I'll list his "crimes" for you: 1. Said he would repeal the Patriot Act (and then didn't) 2. Said he wouldn't sign for the Patriot Act to be renewed (but did and then said he'd never use it) 3. Used the Patriot Act 4. Said he would not sign the NDAA (and then signed it) 5. Use the NDAA 6. Ignored governmental abuse 7. Participated in governmental abuse 8. Murdered an American citizen without due process There. That's much better than talking about his birth certificate. If we were any kind of country we'd try the entire Congress and President for crimes of high treason.
Mmmm...claws...I'm aroused. The stances of an experienced, successful businessman and a reality bound fisc hawk who both understand the importance of removing government boots off the neck of private sector commerce in this tepid and fragile economy... and endeavoring to begin steps to reform the progressive left's institutionalized and wholly unsustainable entitlement pigs (that will, unaddressed, collapse under their own weight, and bring everything else to a calamitous end...including those dependent on them) will ALWAYS present more appeal to me than a committed and unapologetic authoritarian state collectivist ideologue and drunken buffoon who have no intention of EVER addressing the unsustainability of their beloved dependency vote harvesting schemes, their MIA budgets, spending, debt and deficits...or EVER doing anything to inspire confidence in a private sector that they only believe to be an unlimited, manipulatable, and plunderable source of funding for their pie in the sky, childishly utopian, "fair, equal and socially just" economic outcomes.
Can one man do it? Of course not. But the solution is not voting in ANOTHER idiot bought and paid for piece of (*)(*)(*)(*) like Romney.
Okay, you want to go back to Bush administration policy. Not surprising, as most conservatives do pine for the days when the government didn't even pretend it needed a reason to investigate liberals. Currently things are better, as they will pretend they need a reason.
oh wait a minute. clue. No word in the BM (big media) so they're not prepared at this point to start screaming....CRAZY RADICAL GUN TOTING TEA PARTIER!! well. ah'm stumped.
Oh I think there is a shred. http://www.wjla.com/articles/2012/08/chinatown-shooting-leaves-two-wounded-78851.html A suspect in the shooting of a security guard at the headquarters of a downtown D.C. conservative Christian lobbying firm criticized the group's anti-gay stance before opening fire, a source tells ABC7. The shooting took place at the offices of the Family Research Council, which is located at 801 G Street, about a block west of the Verizon Center. A source tells ABC7's Scott Thuman that the suspect is Floyd Corkin, 28, of Virginia. Sources say Corkin walked into the Family Research Council and said Its not about you, its about the policy, and then shot the guard.
No, my sarcasm here is related to how nearly every time there is a mass shooting of some type, you see this sort of commentary from some liberals. I'm not actually suggesting anything from the quote. Just being a wise ass and hoping that some get the point.
