Hilary has torn the Democrat Party apart. How someone can use a private email address for classified work is astounding.
Depends. If he shot Al Sharpton, he would win another 60% of the black vote and another 20% of everyone else's. - - - Updated - - - Definitely. No doubt about it.
Hillary is gearing up to run for something. She has made sure she has been seen out and about in NY and making video statements for various events. She is planning on something in politics.
Hillary ruined what was left of the democrat party after Obama left it in shambles. So her staying as far away from politics might be the best idea from the standpoint of the party.
True, she brought down the entire party with her shameless, ruthless and disgraceful quest for the presidency.
As much as I believe Hillary would have had America's interests at heart, a hundred times more than Trump, I say no. The situation is too dire for anyone with a baggage ridden surname to run. Hence why it would be problematic for Michelle Obama as well, despite her husband treating America so much better.
Disagree with your first part obviously, but you make a good point with the second part. Running Jeb was a prime example
Hillary's campaign shot itself in the foot, and Hillary herself is an unattractive, uninteresting personality that failed to motivate voters. She turned what could have been an easy victory into defeat. What exactly are you expecting from another rerun?
Nobody expects Clinton to run again. She is too smart to embarrass herself in 2020. She has too much baggage, and she knows it.
The left needs to focus on a candidate to run. Not someone based on race or gender. I thought that O'Malley guy from Maryland was a solid debater. But they never gave him TV time. The media chose Hillary well before the voters did.
I don't think Michelle Obama would be anywhere near as problematic as a Clinton rerun. Michelle would have exponentially less baggage that Hillary. But, why run Michelle if the Dems have Oprah?
Obviously, Hillary was a big mistake. But, just how much of a mistake didn't become apparent until well after 2 AM on Election Night. Given the closeness of the election, it is easy hypothesize that any number of Dem candidates (not named Clinton) could've won. A lot of blame to go around, and (in the end) a horribly run campaign by Clinton. Like, who was even responsible for the epic failure of her PA/WI/MI strategy? The endless torment of hindsight (given the closeness of the election in the 3 deciding states). How does Hillary even sleep?
She only made one mistake. Insulting all the small town folks in those key states. The "basket of deplorables" was a detrimental comment. She thought she locked up those states but didn't. It was oversight that Trump took advantage of. That, and her arrogance. O'Malley sticks to his guns, and doesn't have a flip flop history like Clinton did. As I've said many times, he's a liberal, but at least he's a real liberal. Bernie and Hillary were just jesters.
Say what? The polls consistently said she was the weakest link on the Democrat ticket during the primaries, and even after the nomination she was struggling neck and neck in the polls against Trump. She was never the perfect candidate. I don't know where you got that idea. You must have been relying on MSM for your facts, big mistake. - - - Updated - - - Reality struck
Faux Pocohontas? LOL!!! Keep serving them up! If you always do what you always did, you'll always get what you always got.
I wouldn't characterize the "deplorables" remark as her "only" mistake. But, it was certainly the most significant mistake (in a campaign rife with a feeling of misplaced entitlement) that contributed to her loss of the key white working class demographic that ultimately cost her PA/WI/MI.
