How is NWO a conspiracy theory?

Truthers 1, Sheeple 0?

 

Some people aren't like Neo in the Matrix. They have no interest in going down the rabbit hole.

 

Yeah takers of the blue pill... but still they sit here and call Truthers names because of there own ignorance, shame.

 

Yeah, I know what a chairman is.

I told you Obama is not the chairman of the U.N. The closest thing they have to a chairman is the Secretary General, who is not Obama but Ban Ki-Moon, from Republic of Korea.

The U.N Security Council has a temporary "chair", which is simply one of the leaders of the countries on the Security Council who presides over a meeting. They take turns being the chair each time they meet. Obama does not currently hold that position.

So, once again: Obama is not "chairman of the UN," as you claimed.

 

You wonder why you're labeled a conspiracy theorist and not given the credibility you think you deserve? Try not to state blatant bull(*)(*)(*)(*) lies.

Obama has never been the chairman nor is he now the chairman of the UN. Back in 2009, Obama chaired the UN SECURITY COUNCIL, which is a one month position. Even if you could convince people that chairing the security coucil is the same as being chairman for the UN, it was only for one month, which STILL means you're lying your ass off.

If you want credibility, try sticking to the truth.

 

I posted the definition of chairman and then a link to Obama being the chairman and something still doesn't seep into your brains. What sad people you are.

 

OK. If you really insist we expose the ignorance of your claims even more, so be it.

You claim Obama is Chairman of the UN. No such position exists. The highest position of the UN is the Secretary General. This has been pointed out to you. You chose to ignore it in order to push your lies.

You claim Obama continues to hold this position. It has been pointed out that he was chair of the Security Council once.

From your own ignorant opinion piece:

A meeting. Not meetingS. Not the UN but a meeting. A MEETING. One. Singular.

How does ONE MEETING in 2009 equal being chairman of the UN from 2009 to 2012?

And just to be thorough, let's look at what you were whining about in the constitution.

So, is the chair of a meeting a title of Nobility? Let's see.... Duke? no.... Prince? no.... Baron? no.... Knight? no.... King? Only in Obama's dreams.

OK, so no title of Nobility.

So, can the chair of a meeting be construed as an Emolument, Office or Title? If one squints really hard, yes.

But wait, he needs to get the title from a King, Prince or foreign State. Who gave him the title? According to your own article, Obama did. While I am sure Obama fancies himself a King or Prince and he certainly panders to foreign States, he is not any of those.

So nothing Obama did in this instance was against the constitution.

Would you care to go on and try to peddle your lies some more?

 

You claimed that Obama was "chairman of the UN".

Clearly, that is an inaccurate statement.

What's sad is that people like you have this wonderful information-gathering tool in front of them called the internet, and obviously, as you exhibit, our educational system has not given them the ability to critically examine and analyze evidence, such that they persist in clearly nonsensical beliefs.

 

Read the definition I have already posted of what chairman means. Then read the article I posted about what Obama did that day. Or read another one talking about that day. Put 1 + 1 together (This isnt even 2+2 for (*)(*)(*)(*)s sake). DENSE.

 

Yes. Your post proves a denseness that approaches a neutron star.

YOU claimed he IS the chairman of the UN.

He is NOT.

He never has been.

He CHAIRED the UN security council for a DAY in 2009.

There IS no chairman of the UN. There is a Secretary General. Obama has never had that position.

Now, if you want to play semantics and claim Obama was chairman of the security council for one day, fine.

But you don't. You make the absolutely retarded claim that Obama IS the chairman of the entire UN. You can't back it up so you hurl pathetic insults that only expose the fact you are wrong and you KNOW you're wrong.

Even your own source agrees with us and disagrees with you on every aspect of your claim.

And funny how you've run away from your claims that what he did was unconstitutional.

Keep running. Maybe you can still salvage some dignity. Credibility is shot all to hell.

 

Another brain that seems to be malfunctioning. I will try to make it simpler for you.

from http://dictionary.reference.com/
chair·man
noun
4.
to act as or be chairman of (a meeting, committee, etc.).

 

I love a good challenge.

YOU said, and I quote,

THIS is a blatant, outright lie that you, being the oh so honest person that you are, refuse to man up to.

FACT ONE YOU RUN FROM: The UN does not have a chairman no matter HOW badly you want them to have one. The highest position at the UN is Secretary General. Obama is not nor has he ever been the Secretary General.

FACT TWO YOU RUN FROM: Obama was chair (one might even say chairman) for ONE UN security council session in 2009. Your claim that he is NOW chairman of ANYTHING is a blatant lie.

FACT THREE YOU RUN FROM: The UN is NOT the same as the UN Security Council.

FACT FOUR YOU RUN FROM: Obama was not "given" the title of Chairman of the Security Council for ONE session by anyone but himself. Thus your argument he broke the constitution is a blatant lie.

Now, which part of that do you not understand? Nobody is denying he was chair of the security council for one session in 2009. That ISN'T what you are saying.

So. Are you going to try and get by whining about the definition of "chairman" or are you going to address your lameassed lie? My guess is chairman again since you seem either incapable or unwilling to address the lie.

 

Another brain that seems to be malfunctioning. I will try to make it simpler for you.

from http://dictionary.reference.com/
chair·man
noun
4.
to act as or be chairman of (a meeting, committee, etc.).

 

As usual, a truther, presented with the truth, can't get past his own bull(*)(*)(*)(*) to get to the truth.

So, if you still insist Obama is the chairman of the UN, how about presenting us with evidence that your claim is true? The article you posted already calls you a liar. Pretty sad considering it is your own source. Got anything past 2009 that shows he is still chairman of the UN?

It doesn't bother me at all that you insist on this childish game of ignoring the truth while focusing only on the word chairman as though that means something. It isn't my credibility being flushed down the toilet, nor is it my reputation being tarnished since I am not the one constantly lying my ass off.

Keep up the good work!

 

This was posted on 2/18/12:

Please explain to me exactly how Obama was, on 2/18/12, "chairman of the UN." Feel free to use the definition you provided, or any other definition you choose. But you need to show some facts in addition to the definition.

 

Another brain that seems to be malfunctioning. I will try to make it simpler for you.

from http://dictionary.reference.com/
chair·man
noun
4.
to act as or be chairman of (a meeting, committee, etc.).


You already said he was in the chair for a day. The case is closed.

 

He was chair of the UN SECURITY COUNCIL, not the UN. And YOU claimed he is STILL chairman of the UN. Your lies will continue to haunt you no matter how many times you childishly repost the same (*)(*)(*)(*) and hope nobody notices you running like a little girl from your lie.

 

Not chairman of the UN, since that position does not exist.

And not on 2/18/12, when you posted that Obama is NOW chairman of the UN.

Do you seriously think we can't go back and read exactly what you posted?