Ideal recruits

It’s all coming together for America-haters. The article at this link is the only serious challenge I’ve seen to one of the Left’s primary goals:

OBAMA'S ARMY
How America's labor unions serve as ground troops for the radical left
Posted: October 27, 2011
10:30 pm Eastern

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=359809

The article begins:

While running for the presidency, Barack Obama made a mysterious and bizarre campaign promise.

He said that as president he would create "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded" as the U.S. military, to advance his "objectives" for America.

The astonishing announcement, made July 2, 2008, to an audience in Colorado Springs, was ignored by virtually the entire media – except WND. Nobody bothered to ask Obama specifically what he meant, or how he could possibly assemble and fund such a massive civilian army, or why – and he never spoke of it again.

Naturally, the MSM would not touch it in 2008, or any time after, because press barons agree with an armed force loyal to Hussein and, by extension, a force trained and ready to put down public resistence to global government when the time comes. Such a force is absolutely necessary in the very real likelihood the US military will not go along. The oath military officers and enlisted personnel swear is the primary obstacle Hussein’s Ready Reserve Corps must overcome if they hope to succeed.

NOTE: Hussein’s biggest betrayals drop out of media sight as soon as they are instituted. Of course, the Ready reserve Corps is one betrayal, another is allowing INTERPOL to operate in this country; not only operate, but operate with diplomatic immunity; i.e., answerable to no one. INTERPOL is a topic all by itself. If anybody is interested you’ll find details in this thread:

http://www.politicalforum.com/history-past-politicians/152962-forgotten-tragedies.html

The WND article I quoted ties Ready Reserve Corps funding to labor unions, but does not mention that funding Hussein’s private militia is in the healthcare bill: Establishing a Ready Reserve Corps: Sec. 5210.

National security was Hussein’s initial sales pitch. Ostensibly, the Ready Reserve Corps was necessary to deal with national health emergencies as a matter of national security. Fear of pandemic was a much-used socialist scare tactic at the time. In reality, the goal was to give every America-hating communist thug a tax dollar income, military training, and legitimacy. Basically, union goons, ACORN rejects, and the bums populating Occupy Wall Street “demonstrations” are the ideal recruits for Hussein’s private militia.

Never forget that Hussein gave community organizing legitimacy if not respectability although his surrogates and media mouthpieces did everything they could do to minimize his involvement with ACORN cum community organizing. The article in part two is most informative about Hussein’s long involvement with that foul organization.

Let me remind readers that including funding in the healthcare bill is the reason Democrats said they did not read it before voting for it. Pelosi, Reid, and everyone who rammed that monstrosity down the country’s throat could then plead stupidity rather than defend a para-military organization before the bill was passed. To this day, the public does not know who is responsible for inserting the Ready Reserve Corps into Hillarycare II, but every Democrat knew it was there no matter what they said about not reading it before making it law.

Also, the American people should know by now that the federal government, Democrats, Republicans, and bureaucrats, support everything Hussein does; stimulus packages, bailouts that benefitted unions more than it helped the country, raising the debt ceiling, and so on. In plain English the federal government will not stop anything Hussein set in motion even after he is out of office.

The sad truth is: The federal government always caves into violence or a believed threat of violence. Can Americans stop anything in spite of the federal government? I hope so, but I fear that it will take bullets not ballots. One thing is certain. The federal government has been caving into violence from the Left for decades, while it is ill-prepared to deal with violence from two sides; the second side in opposition to socialism/communism.

Let me close my comments by providing the link to the third thread I posted on this board in September 2010. It is still my take on Hussein’s motives and agenda:

http://www.politicalforum.com/united-states/151867-funding-schutzstaffel.html

 

PART TWO:

The connection to Barack Obama is undeniable

ACORN and Occupy Wall Street’s White House Connection
Douglas V. Gibbs Monday, November 7, 2011

The radical “community development” organization that goes by the acronym ACORN never went away. As a community organizer, Barack Obama embraced the organization early on. During his presidential campaign ACORN was instrumental in voter intimidation and dubious voter registration practices for Obama. Barack Obama has had an intimate and long-term association with ACORN. The group has successfully kept its national profile low, except on a couple of occasions where the organization’s corruption was exposed momentarily.

The connection to Barack Obama, however, is undeniable.

Unfortunately, Barack Obama’s connection with ACORN, though it has not gone entirely unreported, has not been fully explained either. Most of what we know about his connection to ACORN is Obama’s involvement in a 1995 lawsuit on behalf of ACORN. The media, and even Obama’s own website, fail to reveal the full depth and extent of his relationship with the organization.

Because of ACORN’s dubious practices, there have been plenty of actions taken to hide any evidence of Obama’s involvement with ACORN. Some of these actions have included wiping the web clean of potentially damaging articles that had appeared, and were previously publicly accessible.

Nothing disappears forever.

The hidden web, where everything is cached, is full of the information that links Obama to ACORN.

Despite Obama’s denial of ever working for ACORN, a 2004 article - Case Study: Chicago - The Barack Obama Campaign - written by Toni Foulkes, a Chicago ACORN Leader, which was published in the journal Social Policy, says otherwise.

Toni Foulkes article said, “Obama took the case, known as ACORN vs. Edgar (the name of the Republican governor at the time) and we won. Obama then went on to run a voter registration project with Project VOTE in 1992 that made it possible for Carol Moseley Braun to win the Senate that year. Project VOTE delivered 50,000 newly registered voters in that campaign (ACORN delivered about 5,000 of them).

“Since then, we have invited Obama to our leadership training sessions to run the session on power every year, and, as a result, many of our newly developing leaders got to know him before he ever ran for office. Thus it was natural for many of us to be active volunteers in his first campaign for State Senate and then his failed bid for U.S. Congress in 1996. By the time he ran for U.S. Senate, we were old friends.”

Clearly, Obama spent time giving ACORN members leadership training, as well as organizing and participating in ACORN’s “Project VOTE” in 1992.

Now, ACORN is in the news again.

Among some political minds it is believed that the White House is behind the Occupy Wall Street protests. Obama, remembering the beating the democrats received in November of 2010 when the TEA Party enabled the Republicans to win in a landslide, decided he needed his own version of the TEA Party. The problem is, liberal collectivists don’t organize in a manner similar to the independently minded TEA Party ralliers. Collectivists need someone to tell them what to do (hence why they embrace big government and tyrants), and so the White House had to orchestrate the protests through some creative community organizing. For Obama, that would be easy, since he is a masterful political agitator.

Obama’s old buddies at ACORN would fit the bill nicely, and so I am sure the organization was the White House’s first choice in being a part of creating the liberal version of a TEA Party.

Problem is, liberal collectivists aren’t clean like TEA Party members, aren’t peaceful like TEA Party members, and they don’t have a clue what to do beyond complaining and protesting.

Neither did the democrats during Bush’s presidency. All they did was complain, call Bush every name in the book, and make every accusation they could get their hands on (more often false accusations at that) - and the politics of personal destruction worked just fine for the leftists.

Now, aside from their politics of personal destruction against Herman Cain and the rest of the Republican field, they are also using those tactics against the achievers and producers of American society through the Occupy Wall Street protests.

And the White House was never pegged as being behind any of it. . .

Until Obama’s buddies at ACORN got fingered.

Now, ACORN Officials are scrambling to hide their association with the Occupy Wall Street protests. ACORN is firing workers and shredding documents, after being exposed as being players behind the Occupy Wall Street protests.

Why would they do that?

In addition to firing staff and shredding documents, the remaining workers are being told to blame disgruntled ex-employees for leaking information in an effort to explain away their involvement in Occupy Wall Street protests.

The New York City chapter is also installing surveillance cameras and recording devices at its Brooklyn offices, is removing or packing away supplies bearing the name ACORN, and is handing out photos of Fox News staff with a stern warning not to talk to the media.

“They’re doing serious damage control right now,” said a New York Communities for Change (ACORN by another name) source to Fox News.

But why would they want to distance themselves from the Occupy protests. Isn’t this kind of thing right up their alley?

Could it be that they are running and hiding not because they are thinking of how they will look being associated with the OWS protests, but because links to the White House may be discovered?

Could it be that they are scrambling in order to protect Obama?

—Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

—ACORN Officials Scramble Firing Workers and Shredding Documents, After Exposed - Fox News

—Barack Obama’s Involvement with ACORN Unearthed, Missing Article Recovered - The Cleveland Leader

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/42119

 

Is this the military thread, or did I accidently find myself in the conspiracy theory area again?

 

To Mushroom: Every time I mention Hussein his apologists shout conspiracy theory, yet you never hear them say it about the many other topics I post on. I present my opinions, interpretations, and sometimes predictions based on reported facts. I do it as an individual; therefore, the definition of conspiracy is not applicable; if it is then everything said by anybody on any subject amounts to a conspiracy theory. Others might agree with my take, but that hardly rises to the level of conspiracy.

Also, I comment on many topics; so why are they not all conspiracy theories? Others posters do the same thing in their messages; some do not provide the reported facts I include.

Incidentally, using the definition of conspiracy theory Hussein’s defenders wield like an editorial sword, I could also accuse them of engaging in a conspiracy to protect him. Frankly, the more they say the stronger my case becomes.

Finally, the details in the linked article about the movie J. Edgar smacks of conspiracy theory to me because a lot of people, including Clint Eastwood, took part in producing it. J Edgar Hoover is a tick below Joe McCarthy on the liberals list of most hated American villains; so don’t look for anybody on the Left to call the movie a conspiracy theory.

This excerpt is especially delicious to me:

Contrary to what the filmmakers are saying about the movie being historically accurate, it is obvious that rumors were used as facts.

I’m pretty sure I never intentionally introduced rumors as fact.

November 9, 2011
The Real J. Edgar Hoover
By Elise Cooper

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2011/11/the_real_j_edgar_hoover.html

 

I am hardly a President Obama apologist. I certainly did not vote for him, and oppose a great many of his policies.

But you talk about a secret army, and the forcing of the US to join some kind of Global Government. That is conspiracy talk, if you support him or not.

 

To Mushroom: It’s not a secret army. Its purpose is the secret.

I understand people who do not pay attention to politics, but you have been posting messages on a political message board for more than two years, yet your response says you are unaware of the forces driving this country to surrender its sovereignty to a global government.

And if the following is not an integral component in a conspiracy it will do for now:

David Rockefeller, then-Chairman of Chase Manhattan bank, said this at a 1991 Bilderberger meeting in Baden-Baden Germany:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."

The media blackout protecting the overt betrayal of America’s independence began nearly 60 years ago —— when the UN was in its infancy. The effects of the blackout have been devastating. Many Americans are only now learning that UN agencies have quietly been establishing a global government with American tax dollars —— in addition to influencing every aspect of American life; a negative influence I hasten to add. It’s been slow-going for the global government crowd since the blackout began, but it has not been ineffective thanks to the press.

More recently the Vatican said this:

"Of course, this transformation will be made at the cost of a gradual, balanced transfer of a part of each nation's powers to a world authority and to regional authorities, but this is necessary at a time when the dynamism of human society and the economy and the progress of technology are transcending borders, which are in fact already very eroded in a globalised world."

That statement is not proof of a conspiracy, but to say that a part of sovereignty can be surrendered without losing it all comes pretty close to supporting those who have been conspiring for so long.

Of course, I could be misinterpreting your response. A careful reading tells me you could be saying there is a move towards global government, but that it is not a conspiratorial. If that is your meaning you now have the opportunity to make your case.